Published by BNY Mellon Asset Management’s Investment Strategy and Solutions Group (ISSG), the paper contends that a back-tested portfolio of asset allocation adjustments based on growth and inflation expectations has achieved nearly a doubling of the risk-to-return Sharpe ratio (a higher Sharpe ratio implies a higher return for the same amount of risk) over the last 23 years, when compared with a typical institutional portfolio.
The report, “Great Expectations: Regime-Based Asset Allocation Seeks Higher Return, Lower Drawdowns,” says this approach to asset allocation may also provide meaningful downside
protection in periods of market stress, such as the bursting of the
technology bubble in the early 2000s and the global financial crisis of
2007-2009, the report said.
The ISSG report concluded that growth and inflation expectations in the U.S. over the last 40 years included a more complex pattern of macroeconomic regimes and transitions than many investors assume. Changes in growth and inflation expectations rather than simply changes in growth or inflation significantly can affect asset class performance, according to the report.
The group used these insights to develop a model to predict the probability of regime changes and adjust portfolio exposures accordingly. “We think asset allocation approaches that are mindful of, and responsive to, portfolio risk factors across regimes have the potential to achieve investors’ long-term return objectives, while better protecting against devastating drawdowns,” said Jeff Saef, Managing Director of BNY Mellon Asset Management and head of ISSG. “Given the challenging investment environment, we believe investors should consider a more opportunistic approach to asset allocation strategies.”