More DC Plans May Add Roth Features

An increasing number of U.S. employers are planning to add Roth features to their defined contribution (DC) plans in 2013.

New legislation makes it easier for DC investors to convert balances in their savings plans into Roth accounts, Aon Hewitt noted in a survey.

Just after the passage of the American Tax Payer Relief Act of 2012—or so-called fiscal cliff deal—Aon Hewitt conducted a pulse survey of more than 300 individuals from large U.S. corporations to determine the prevalence of Roth accounts and employers’ likely actions concerning their plans over the next 12 months.

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

According to Aon Hewitt’s findings, almost half (49%) of respondents currently offer no Roth provisions. Of those that do not offer Roth provisions, 29% are very or somewhat likely to add this feature in the next 12 months. Of those new adopters, more than three-quarters (76%) will add both Roth contribution and in-plan conversion features.

Employers have steadily been adopting Roth features in recent years, said Patti Balthazor Bjork, director of retirement research at Aon Hewitt. “The new law, along with a better understanding of Roth by both participants and companies, will encourage more plan sponsors to add these options in the near-term,” Bjork said.

Employers that already have a Roth contribution option are likely to allow employees to make in-plan conversions to Roth accounts, Aon Hewitt’s survey found. Of those respondents that currently allow Roth contributions but do not offer in-plan conversions, more than half (53%) are very or somewhat likely to add this feature in the next 12 months.

For companies that already allow Roth contributions and in-plan conversions, more than three-quarters (79%) are very or somewhat likely to expand the eligibility for in-plan conversions, allowing them for previously non-distributable amounts.

“The new rules open the door for employers to allow expanded in-plan conversions, but it’s not a requirement,” Bjork said. “However, it makes the Roth conversions more attractive for employees, so there will likely be increased interest and incentive for employers to offer them.”

California Sues Standard & Poor’s

 

California Attorney General Kamala D. Harris filed a lawsuit against Standard & Poor’s (S&P) for inflating its ratings of structured finance investments.


 

 

Harris says S&P’s actions caused California’s public pension funds and other investors to lose billions of dollars. The complaint alleges that the McGraw-Hill Companies Inc. and Standard and Poor’s Financial Services LLC violated the False Claims Act and other state laws by using a ratings process based on what senior executives described as “magic numbers” and “guesses.”  

Specifically, the complaint alleges that, from 2004 to 2007, S&P systematically misrepresented to the public, and to the California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) and the California State Teachers Retirement System (CalSTRS), that its ratings of structured finance securities were based on an independent, objective and reliable analysis, and not influenced by S&P’s economic interests. In doing so, S&P lowered its standards for rating securities to gain market share and increase profits and violated the False Claims Act by making false statements about the nature and risk of investments. The complaint also describes the company’s efforts to suppress the development of new and more accurate ratings models.  

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

In mid-2007, the housing bubble burst. After securities that S&P had deemed the least risky began defaulting, S&P downgraded many residential mortgage backed securities investments. The market collapsed, and of those securities issued in 2007, more than 90% were downgraded to junk status. The two retirement systems lost approximately $1 billion.  

Attorney General Harris joined the Department of Justice and 12 other states and the District of Columbia in announcing lawsuits against S&P. However, California’s suit includes a claim for triple damages, because when the state makes a purchase based on a false statement, the defendant is responsible for the amount lost times three.   

The complaint can be downloaded from here, at the bottom of the page.

«