Products April 29, 2010

MassMutual Aims to Help Advisers, TPAs Win in Small Market

MassMutual Retirement Services said it enhanced product, pricing, and process in order to help retirement plan advisers and third-party administrators (TPAs) in the $5 million and under market.
Reported by

The firm said improvements include making products easier to understand and straightforward pricing that is banded to enable pricing reductions as the plan grows. “Our streamlined sales process and product design make it easier to explain and quote more plans in less time, allowing for more sales opportunities, better plan retention, and the opportunity for more profitable growth,” said Hugh O’Toole, senior vice president and head of sales and client management for MassMutual’s Retirement Services Division, in a news release.

MassMutual offers both fully bundled and TPA service models. The enhanced products include a broad selection of group annuity and registered mutual fund investment options for 401(k) and 403(b) plans, including stable value and multiple target-date options from a variety of fund families on MassMutual’s Smart Architecture investment platform. Value-added services include MassMutual’s RetireSmart participant education tools such as RetireSmart Academy and automated participant education campaigns among others.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

Furthermore, MassMutual offers a suite of materials to assist retirement plan advisers and TPAs in presenting the product to plan sponsors and supporting them on an ongoing basis.

For more information, contact your MassMutual sales representative or contact MassMutual at 1.866.444.2601 or www.massmutual.com/retire.

Compliance April 29, 2010

Unisys, Fidelity Win Excessive Fee Case Dismissal

A federal court has dismissed charges that Unisys Corporation and Fidelity Management Trust Company caused participants in Unisys’ retirement savings plan to pay excessive fees.
Reported by

In his opinion, U.S. District Judge Berle M. Schiller of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania found that Fidelity Management Trust Company and other Fidelity defendants were not functional fiduciaries with respect to investment selection for the plan, so no claim could be made against them.

Schiller found that Unisys met the requisite standard of care in its investment offerings to participants. According to the opinion, the plan offered participants 70 investment options with varying fees, risks, and potential rewards—including commingled pools, index funds, bond funds, funds representing various parts of the global economy, and a money market fund—and the fees charged by these funds were disclosed to investors who could choose from among the investment options to create a portfolio tailored to meet their investment objectives.

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

Referencing the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision in Hecker v. Deere & Co., Schiller said the Employee Retirement Income Security Act does not require fiduciaries to get the best deal imaginable for the plan; it requires them to act carefully, skillfully, prudently, diligently, and solely in the interest of participants and beneficiaries. “While this is not a light duty, it does not support a lawsuit that simply claims the fiduciaries could have done better had they worked harder to leverage their market power,” Schiller wrote.

He also said he failed to see the importance of any alleged system of revenue sharing. “Plan participants were made aware of the fees they would pay for allocating their Plan contributions to particular funds. To whom that money ultimately flowed would seem irrelevant to a participant once it left his wallet,” Schiller wrote. He ruled that Unisys defendants’ failure to disclose information about revenue sharing among the Fidelity defendants cannot form the basis of an ERISA breach of fiduciary duty claim.

Participants accused Fidelity defendants and Unisys defendants of breaching ERISA fiduciary duties by causing plan participants and beneficiaries to pay excessive administrative and investment management fees. In particular, they alleged that the defendants did not take advantage of the plan’s large size to negotiate lower fees or increased services for plan participants and beneficiaries.

The opinion in Renfro v. Unisys Corporation, et.al., is here.

«