Comparing Retirement Income Solutions

Broadridge expert discusses two major types of insurance categories for guaranteed retirement payouts.

Advisers can get stumped when selecting the best type of guaranteed income solution for clients, but it can help to break down the offerings into two main categories: guaranteed withdrawal benefits and immediate annuities, according to Glenn Dial, senior retirement strategist at American Century Investments.

“There’s really only two major types of insurance categories,” Dial said on Thursday during a Broadridge Financial Solutions-hosted webinar, “How to Compare Retirement Income Solutions.”

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

Dial went on to break down the differences between GWB annuities and immediate annuities, with the key distinction being about how much control an owner has over the product as measured against the amount of payout.

Retail annuity sales are booming, according to LIMRA, which found that annualized premium for workplace life insurance, disability insurance and supplemental health products has shown strong increases over the year. Meanwhile plan advisers and plan sponsors are considering how to best offer them to participants via the plans.

Guaranteed Withdrawal Benefits

“With one group of insurance [GWBs], you’ll hear these terms: explicit insurance fees, revocable and participant ownership. They all mean about the same thing,” Dial explained.

Most of the GWB insurance products that have explicit fees, or are revocable, continue to be owned by the participant even during the distribution phase, he said. While there are exceptions, GWB-type contracts will provide full market participation as well as full liquidity, both pre- and post-retirement.

“You’re not losing control from a liquidity standpoint or from a market participation standpoint,” said Dial. “If you want your cake and want to eat it too, generally speaking, your payout, especially at age 65, would be less than what you would get in what we call an immediate annuity or herd annuity type products.”

Immediate Annuities

Dial said to think about products such as immediate annuities and term annuities as stable value investments, where the fees are typically implicit. Depending on the provider, these products usually include some type of restriction, whether that be an irrevocable stipulation or limitations on when one can sell. In return for giving up some of the control, buyers receive a higher guarantee immediately after entering retirement.

Immediate annuities offer guaranteed income for life, providing financial security and stability, especially for retirees, according to SmartAsset. They shield against market fluctuations and outliving savings. However, the trade-off is the loss of control over the lump sum invested, as funds are converted into fixed payments, potentially limiting liquidity. Additionally, inflation can erode the purchasing power of fixed payments over time. Depending on the individual’s health and longevity, they may not receive the full value of their investment.

In-Plan Future

There is a place for both GWB and immediate annuity type products in the retirement income marketplace, according to Dial. He said in the future, plan sponsors will have both products on their platform, but they will want to start with one type, which is where advisers can come in and provide guidance.

“I think that’s what your job is, helping your client consider ‘Which will I start with?’ Is it going to be more the revocable side where the sponsor or participant wants more flexibility? Or is it someone who says this is about income, so I’ll give up flexibility and controls for even higher income right out the gate?”

He recommended considering  a client’s preferences in these categories because it will be useful when advisers have conversations with the sponsors.

“Once you know is it participant-owned or is it insurance-owned then you’re going to know the answer to about 80 or 90% of all the other questions that are going to come up about the product without having to know all the details,” said Dial.

Social Security Funds Gain Additional Year in Forecasting

A strong job market and wage growth helps extend forecast for both funds when compared to last year.

A strong job market has helped buy the Social Security Trust Funds another year, according to the annual report from the Social Security Board of Trustees report released Monday.

The combined asset reserves of the Old-Age and Survivors Insurance and Disability Insurance Trust Funds are forecast to have enough revenue to pay all benefits and associated administrative costs until 2035, one year more than projected last year.

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

Without Congressional action, the funds are projected to be depleted in 2035, with income sufficient to cover 83 percent of scheduled benefits, according to the board of trustees’ report.

The news of strengthened funding in part on the robust job market and wage growth comes as the Federal Reserve considers whether these relatively strong indicators, in addition to persistently strong inflation, should keep it from planned interest rate cuts this year. Decisions around Social Security have also been the subject of campaigning ahead of the November elections, with outcomes for the presidency and Congress potentially having an impact on the benefit.

According to this year’s report, the combined trust funds dropped by $41 billion in 2023 to a total of $2.788 trillion. Meanwhile, the total annual cost of the program is projected to exceed total annual income in 2024 and remain higher going forward; total costs began to be higher than total income in 2021.

“Congress can and should take action to extend the financial health of the Trust Fund into the foreseeable future, just as it did in the past on a bipartisan basis,” Martin O’Malley, Commissioner of Social Security, said in a statement. “Eliminating the shortfall will bring peace of mind to Social Security’s 70 million-plus beneficiaries, the 180 million workers and their families who contribute to Social Security, and the entire nation.”

Social Security paid total benefits of $1.379 trillion in 2023 to about 67 million beneficiaries, with total expenditures of $1.392 trillion. Meanwhile, an estimated 183 million people had earnings covered by Social Security and paid payroll taxes, leading to total income, including interest, of $1.351 trillion in the year.

The combined trust fund asset reserves earned interest at an effective annual rate of 2.4 percent in 2023.

The projected actuarial deficit over the 75-year long-range period is 3.50% of taxable payroll, according to the report. That is lower than the 3.61% projected last year.

The board did note that, when taken separately, the OASI trust fund alone would be depleted in 2033. It also found that the ratio of reserves as compared to annual cost is projected to drop from 188% at the beginning of 2024 to just 84% at the start of 2030, staying below 100% for the next 10 years. Because of that ratio drop below 100%, the trust funds will fail the board’s test of short-range financial adequacy.

The Social Security board has space for six members, with four currently serving due to their position in the Federal Government: Janet Yellen, Secretary of the Treasury and Managing Trustee; Martin O’Malley, Commissioner of Social Security; Xavier Becerra, Secretary of Health and Human Services; and Julie Su, Acting Secretary of Labor. Two public trustee positions are currently vacant.

«