Pre-retirees who work with an adviser are more likely to
have done the necessary retirement planning which would lead to more realistic
confidence in their retirement security, according to the LIMRA Secure Retirement Instititue.
Study
results published in the Institute’s new “2015 Retirement Income Reference Book” reveals two-thirds
(67%) of those who work with an adviser have determined what their income in retirement
will be, compared to 46% of those who do not work with an adviser. Sixty-three
percent of respondents who work with an adviser have determined what their
expenses in retirement will be, while only 39% of those without an adviser have
done so.
Those
who work with an adviser have determined what their Social Security benefit
will be at different ages more so than those who do not work with an adviser
(80% vs. 57%). The same is true for determining health care coverage in
retirement (57% vs. 33%) and estimating how long their savings will last (50%
vs. 27%).
In
addition, pre-retirees who work with an adviser are more likely to feel
confident than those who do not (79% vs. 50%). Forty percent have determined a
specific plan for generating retirement income from savings, compared to only
22% of those who do not work with an adviser.
While some planning
is better than none, a specific plan enables pre-retirees to feel confident
about retirement based on real information and preparation instead of ad hoc
strategies and belt-tightening, LIMRA says.
NEXT: Overall, pre-retiree confidence does not match planning efforts
More
than 1.5 million people will retire every year from now until 2025, the LIMRA
Secure Retirement Institute says.
Overall, the
research found that just more than half of pre-retirees (ages 50 to 75 with at
least $100,000 in household investable assets) are confident in their
retirement security based on their self-assessed ability to manage finances (62%)
and the expectation of living modestly in retirement (59%). However, study
results reveal only 20% of all respondents actually have a formal retirement plan, and less than 40% have
done basic planning activities, such as calculating what their assets, income,
and expenses will be in retirement.
Institute
research shows only one in four retirees express major concern about longevity
risk, even though half of 65-year-olds will live into their late 80s. And less
than half say they are concerned with the risk of having to provide for long
term care expenses and costs associated with health care outside of what Medicare
covers.
A
confident attitude is encouraging, but Institute researchers point out that
confidence based on subjective assessments instead of real-world planning can
threaten the security of a person's retirement.
By using this site you agree to our network wide Privacy Policy.
For some clients there are major potential benefits in converting pre-tax retirement plan accounts to a Roth account. For others it’s
a pretty bad idea and can lead to large unexpected tax bills and other
challenges.
“A lot of retirement plan participants don’t even know what
a Roth account is, and many that do wish they had known sooner,” says Meghan
Murphy, director of thought leadership at Fidelity Investments in Boston.
The Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of
2001 (EGTRRA) introduced Roth accounts to defined contribution plans. The
accounts allow plan participants to contribute after-tax money to their savings
on which they will owe no taxes on qualified distributions. The provision of
Roth accounts was set to end in 2010, but the Pension Protection Act (PPA) in
2006 made the accounts permanent.
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued guidance in 2010
allowing for participants to do an in-plan rollover, called conversions, of pre-tax
accounts to Roth accounts upon a distributable event. But, in 2012, it expanded that ability to
non-distributable amounts.
Tim Steffen, director of Financial Planning at Robert W.
Baird & Co. in Milwaukee, tells PLANADVISER the primary reason a retirement
plan participant would want to convert pre-tax money to a Roth account is that
the tax cost on the amount converted today would be less than the tax cost of
distributions from pre-tax accounts later. “Participants must compare the tax
benefit during the contribution period to that of the distribution period,” he
says.
For example, a high-income individual may decide tax-deferral
during his peak earning years is more valuable than paying no tax on
distributions during retirement when he will be in a lower tax bracket, Steffen
explains. On the other hand, Baird tells younger participants who are
entering the workforce and in their lowest earning years, they would probably
get a better value by putting retirement savings into a Roth account.
Murphy adds that Fidelity sees younger people doing Roth
conversions because they realize they have 30 or more years until retirement and
see it as a great opportunity to not have to pay taxes in the future.
NEXT: Rules about Roth conversions
Lisa H. Barton, a partner with law firm Morgan, Lewis &
Bockius LLP in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, notes that, in order for a DC plan
participant to initiate a Roth conversion, the plan document must allow for
that. She tells PLANADVISER, the plan document will specify what amounts can be
converted; the plan can permit amounts in pre-tax, match, after-tax and/or
profit sharing accounts to be converted.
Even if an account that is already made up from after-tax
contributions is converted, the earnings in those accounts that are converted
would not be taxable, so there is a tax benefit for every type of account,
Barton points out.
Participants can only convert amounts in which they are
fully vested. And, the plan document will specify how often participants are
allowed to initiate a conversion.
According to Barton, taxes cannot be taken out at the time
of the conversion. Steffen explains this is because that would make the
converted amount an early withdrawal, subject to a penalty. Murphy adds that
the recordkeeper provides a statement to participants at year end and they
report the converted amount as income with their annual return. Fidelity always
tells participants who want to initiate a conversion that they should consult
with a tax adviser before making a move that would impact income taxes.
When offering the ability to do Roth conversions, plan
sponsors should consider what their recordkeeper can handle and what the
recordkeeper requires, Barton says. “It gets tricky from a recordkeeping
perspective.”
She explains that whatever withdrawal provisions apply to
amounts before conversion have to apply after conversion—if a withdrawal type
wasn’t available for the amounts before, it cannot be afterward, and vice
versa—except for hardship withdrawals. In addition, amounts converted must be
held in the account for five years starting at the date of conversion before
they can be distributed or they will be subject to a pre-tax penalty. These two
conditions create the possibility of the recordkeeper having to keep up with
several different buckets of money.
Finally, Barton says, participants are not required to get
spousal consent to do an in-plan conversion. If a converted account has an
outstanding loan, it is treated the same in the Roth account. If the plan is a
safe harbor plan, it cannot be amended to add a Roth conversion provision
mid-year.
NEXT: What participants need to know
According to Murphy, Roth conversion ability is so much more
common among large plans; 1,800 of Fidelity’s clients offer the option.
“Normally the option to convert to Roth is being added to the plan because
participants are telling plan sponsors they want it, yet a small percentage of
participants use the option,” she says.
“There is a big need to educate participants about Roths,”
Murphy says. “They already have two choices—how much to save and how to
invest—and now they must make a decision about the tax treatment of their
contributions. Most people don’t even know what tax bracket they are in.”
She suggests plan sponsors educate participants when the
feature is adopted for the plan, upon hire, and during open enrollment. Roth
education should also be part of information available to participants through
advice programs, and if the plan has an adviser, sponsors should make sure
advisers are educating participants.
Participants need to understand whether contributing to or
converting to a Roth account is right for them. For participants who are
underprepared for retirement or plan to rely mostly on Social Security in
retirement, Roth may not be right for them, Murphy explains. And, highly
compensated participants who will return to a lower tax bracket in retirement
should not convert to a Roth.
Also, Murphy says, participants who have tax concerns
already should consider whether they are prepared to add to their tax bill now.
Participants need to understand that there is a tax-cost, Steffen adds. He says
sometimes they do a large conversion and are taken aback by how much taxes are.
He notes that one of the things participant education should highlight is that
they don’t have to convert an entire account balance at once; they can do
smaller pieces each year.
There are reasons other than tax treatment that participants
may consider converting amounts to Roth accounts. Steffen notes that they can
avoid having to take a required minimum distribution (RMD) on some of their
savings; while money in a qualified retirement plan is subject to RMDs,
participants can roll those accounts to a Roth individual retirement account
(IRA) upon retirement which is not subject to RMDs.
The allowance of conversions of after-tax amounts to a Roth
account may help people put away more money for retirement in Roth accounts.
Barton explains that after-tax contributions are not subject to the IRS 402(g)
limit on deferrals, but they still are subject to non-discrimination testing,
so this may not help some participants put away more savings.
“The decision to contribute to or convert to Roth accounts
is really specific to each individual,” she concludes.