7 Steps to Further Diversity in Asset Management

A Milken Institute financial markets director lays out the firm’s plan to improve diversity in asset management.

Milken Institute research shows that diverse teams outperform homogenous ones, says Troy Duffie, director, MI finance. For financial firms that don’t have a diverse workforce, however, it’s not something that can be wished into being.

“If you have a desire to build a more inclusive firm without a plan to get there, it’s like driving a car without a steering wheel,” Duffie says.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

Troy Duffie

To that end, Duffie and the team at the Milken Institute have been researching diversity in the asset management sector and, earlier this year, came out with a report, “Inclusive Capitalism,” that lays out seven strategies for “specific action” in diversifying asset management teams.

These steps include both goal-setting, such as standardizing a governance diversity pledge, and setting up a system of mentoring and tracking for underrepresented employees. The Milken Institute’s recommendations, Duffie says, come in part from real-world examples gleaned from council members running large pools of assets.

“We ask our council members: What are you doing that works?” he says. “They find success not by saying, ‘We want to mentor people,’ but by putting a plan in place that would set up mentoring and track progress to ensure employees are getting opportunities and being given the chance to perform at a high level on a consistent basis.”

The task before the asset management space is vast, according to Milken’s research. Black, indigenous and people of color asset managers account for just 2% of the $86 trillion asset management industry, according to the Santa Monica, California-based nonprofit.

Milken’s seven steps are “proposed actions that are aimed to increase diversity, capture unrealized value and mitigate long-term risks within the asset management sector,” Duffie says. “These seven specific actions give [firms] ways they can do this within their firms with actionable steps they can enact immediately.”

The seven action items:

Redirect data and metrics on diversity “to be grounded in evidence that diversity is an element of fulfilling our fiduciary responsibility to optimize returns for our investors”;

  • Expand the talent pipeline to source diverse talent and recruit from historically Black colleges and universities;
  • Mentor and track employees from underrepresented groups; 
  • Standardize a governance diversity pledge committed to addressing diversity in boards, companies and investment portfolios; 
  • Intentionally convene with emerging asset managers and underrepresented asset managers; 
  • Expand access to diverse managers by supporting underrepresented emerging managers; and 
  • Standardize a scorecard for DEI that holds firms accountable. 

The institute is following its own advice, Duffie says, by partnering with 13 HBCUs to connect their students to Milken’s various business members. The institute is also working with partner firms to create a diversity, equity and inclusion scorecard for financial companies; 300 firms have already signed up to participate.

Citing the 2%percentage of BIPOC leaders in the asset management space, Duffie says industry leaders should consider: “What does it look like to get to 5%? What does it look like to get to 10%? We need to measure that marker to see how we are doing to actively get there.”

Aside from the data, however, Duffie notes that when it comes to the markets and business growth, the “math doesn’t have an opinion.”

“If you are not designing businesses and firms for the markets of tomorrow, you are leading a business that will die today,” he says. “Companies that are committed to our work … are building for the diverse markets and diverse worlds of tomorrow.” 

Senate Bill Would Block SEC Predictive Analytics Proposal

Many industry leaders in retirement planning have called for a full or partial withdrawal of the proposal.

Senate Republicans Tuesday introduced the Protecting Innovation in Investment Act to prevent the implementation of a proposed predictive data analytics rule from the Securities and Exchange Commission. The bill was proposed by Senators Ted Cruz, R-Texas, and Bill Hagerty, R-Tennessee.

The full name of the SEC’s proposal is “Conflicts of Interest Associated With the Use of Predictive Data Analytics by Broker-Dealers and Investment Advisers,” and it has been widely opposed by the financial industry, primarily because of the wide range of technologies covered.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

The SEC’s proposal would require an adviser to “eliminate or neutralize the effect of conflicts of interest associated with the firm’s use of covered technologies in investor interactions that place the firm’s or its associated person’s interest ahead of investors’ interests.”

A covered technology refers to “a firm’s use of analytical, technological, or computational functions, algorithms, models, correlation matrices, or similar methods or processes that optimize for, predict, guide, forecast, or direct investment-related behaviors or outcomes of an investor.”

Commenters on the proposal have said it would effectively prevent the use of several basic technologies. The ERISA Industry Commission noted in its letter to the SEC that the proposal would apply to ordinary retirement readiness calculators and chatbots that recordkeepers and other firms utilize with retirement plan participants. ERIC called on the SEC to fully withdraw the proposal.

The American Benefits Council also called for a withdrawal and Empower asked for an exemption for retirement education tools such as readiness calculators.

Supporters of the senators’ proposed bill echoed the concerns. The Insured Retirement Institute released an emailed statement Tuesday stating that “The [SEC] proposal’s broad definition of covered technology serves not to effectively establish guardrails for the future as intended but to paralyze and cast a shadow on the present.”

The Investment Company Institute wrote that the proposal would bring “everything from the most sophisticated technologies to simple spreadsheets into question under the new conflict of interest standard, and would be almost impossible to comply with, inhibiting firms’ use of technology to better serve investors.”

The bill will likely be referred to the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs and no hearing or vote on it is scheduled.

«