Financial Advisers Plan to Increase Alt Exposure in ’24

An annual CAIS-Mercer study finds bullishness for alts, though adding them to workplace retirement plans will take finesse, according to an expert.

Financial advisers are likely to boost client portfolio exposure to alternative investments next year, though hurdles remain to the offerings, according to a second annual alt investment survey.

In a survey of 260 financial advisers, 85% said they expect to increase allocations to alternative asset classes in 2024, as measured by CAIS Capital LLC, a firm that connects advisers to alternative asset managers, and consultancy Mercer, a Marsh McLennan company.

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

That increase will come with 62% of that group of advisers already allocating between 6 and 25% of clients’ portfolios to alternatives, according to the study.

The survey was conducted, in part, at a CAIS alternative investment summit in October, perhaps showing a captive audience for alternatives. But flows into alternative assets have been rising. Global asset managers allocated $144 billion to alternative investments in 2022, up from $130 billion the year prior, according to the latest research by investment data services and consultancy Vidrio Financial LLC.

According to the CAIS and Mercer study, alternatives are popular among financial advisers in part to retain, as well as attract, clients. Among advisers surveyed, 83% advisers said offering alternatives helps differentiate them from their peers, and 78% said the investment strategy can help clients meet goals and objectives.

Furthermore, 59% of those surveyed said access to alternative investment opportunities helps win new clients, and 51% said it helps “gain wallet share” with existing clients.

Retirement Plan Obstacles

Advisers do have trepidation about adding alternative investments, according to the survey: 55% cited concern with high levels of administration and paperwork for offering alternatives in portfolios. Another 47% cited liquidity concerns of putting assets into the investment, and 35% noted due diligence and compliance concerns.

Those concerns, particularly liquidity, have been a barrier to adding alternative investments into retirement plans.

Neil Blundell, managing director and head of the CAIS investment team, says via email that the longer-term investing strategy of a defined contribution plan can be bolstered by “certain alternative investments.”

“Some strategies may offer the potential to enhance retirement objectives through enhanced growth, supplemental income, diversified risk and/ or the preservation of capital,” Blundell says.

Those vehicles can include registered fund structures such as a business development company, which offers a way to invest in small-and medium-sized companies; private real estate investment trusts; and interval funds and tender funds, which offer investments in company shares not traded on the secondary market.

“These structures can potentially offer access to quality alternative managers and their investment capabilities in product structures that may be better suited for the retirement community,“ Blundell says.

Real Estate Tops

Among the financial advisers in the survey, the most popular alternative allocation options were real estate (96%), private equity (93%) and private debt (91%).

The alternative options also vary according to need, with 65% of advisers indicating private equity is good for enhancing returns, 41% saying private debt is good to supplement income, and reasons to choose real estate split between diversifying risk (34%) and supplementing income (32%).

The CAIS and Mercer survey was conducted from September 12 through October 30, including at the CAIS Alternative Investment Summit in Los Angeles. The 260 respondents came from independent registered investment advisories, broker/dealer affiliates and family offices, among others.

Inspector General Report Calls for Greater EBSA Authority

The report argues that EBSA should have more authority over the Federal Thrift Plan and resources to conduct audits.

Department of Labor Inspector General Larry Turner issued a semi-annual report Tuesday arguing that the Employee Benefit Security Administration lacks both the resources and authority to fulfill its mandate to employee benefit plans.

The report particularly emphasized EBSA’s limited authority to conduct thorough audits of workplace retirement plans.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

“ERISA provisions allow billions of dollars in pension assets to escape full audit scrutiny,” the report stated, addressing limited-scope plan audits, which occur when pensions with at least 100 participants can get certain assets verified by a bank or insurance company, thereby avoiding an additional EBSA audit.

The report stated that this approach to auditing provides “little to no confirmation regarding the actual existence or value of the assets.”

Bradford Campbell, a partner at Faegre Drinker and former head of EBSA, says limited-scope audits have been “a perennial favorite of the OIG.” He argues that where assets are overseen by another body, “it would be expensive, impractical and wasteful to require multiple, duplicative audits.”

If a bank or insurance company “certifies the assets subject to their own regulatory requirements,” as opposed to government requirements, then it does not make sense for the plan to also be audited by EBSA, according to Campbell.

The Office of the Inspector General also highlighted in the report EBSA’s lack of authority over the Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board; EBSA is limited to making recommendations, but it cannot compel the board to follow them.

The report highlighted the cybersecurity risks facing the Thrift Savings Plan and lamented EBSA does not have more oversight of third-party cybersecurity vendors and practices, noting that “cyber threats potentially place at risk trillions of dollars in other ERISA-covered retirement plan assets.”

Campbell counters that the limited authority over the Federal Thrift Board “was not an oversight but intentional policy: EBSA serves as an experienced and effective watchdog but was never intended to have discretionary authority over federal employee retirement plans.”

Among other areas, the 176-page report noted that EBSA lacks the resources to protect an estimated 70 million plan participants in self-insured health plans from “improper denial of health claims.”

Campbell says the issues raised by the Office of the Inspector General are those “that require statutory changes unlikely to be made,” and the office should instead focus on the “agency’s effectiveness in utilizing the resources and authority that it currently has.”

«