Implementing SECURE’s Emergency Savings Provisions

Emergency savings options within retirement plans will finally be possible in 2024. But implementing them will require work that might delay their use even more, according to experts.

The new SECURE 2.0 retirement law contains two main provisions related to emergency savings, both of which are optional for plan sponsors starting in 2024. The Department of Labor’s schedule for providing regulatory guidance is not yet known.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

The first would permit the creation of a “sidecar” account tied to a participant’s retirement account. This account would be capped at $2,500, or a smaller amount set by the sponsor. According to Mike Hadley, a partner in the Davis & Harman law firm and a member of the Society of Professional Asset Managers and Recordkeepers (SPARK) Institute’s advocacy team, the sidecar account must be invested in principal-protected assets, and earnings from those assets may exceed $2,500, but additional contributions cannot be added above $2,500. The Securities and Exchange Commission defines principal-protected investments as investments that offer full principal protection if held until maturity and generally allow investors to earn returns tied to the performance of an underlying asset.

Employers may also auto-enroll participants at a rate of up to 3% of pay into sidecar accounts and must allow withdrawals at least once per month. A participant may also contribute to sidecar and retirement accounts concurrently.

However, employers cannot contribute directly into the sidecar account. If an employer offers a match, that match must go into the participant’s retirement account, while the employee contribution would proceed into the sidecar account.

Jeff Cimini, the head of strategy and financial management at Voya Financial, says adding the $2,500 sidecar account would require a plan amendment, which he says is not a particularly complicated process. Plans often refer to statutory and regulatory codes in their plan documents, so when the code is updated, the plan does not necessarily have to change. But since the sidecar account is a new destination for contributions, plan language itself must be amended.

Cimini says the sidecar account withdrawal rules are broader than ordinary IRS hardship withdrawal rules.

SECURE 2.0 also allows participants to self-attest that they meet IRS hardship criteria for the purposes of larger hardship withdrawals. Cimini explains that participants previously had to provide documentation of their hardship, such as an eviction notice, to claim a hardship withdrawal. Now they can simply self-attest.

The sidecar account must also be a Roth account in the sense that contributions are taxed before they are deposited, rather than upon withdrawal. However, Cimini says the early withdrawal penalty and the requirement that one wait five years before withdrawing do not apply to sidecar accounts.

If a participant’s sidecar account reaches its $2,500 limit, subsequent contributions must then go to another account, most likely the participant’s ordinary retirement account. This could require a potential pivot from post-tax contributions to pre-tax contributions, something the “IT group will have to figure out,” according to Cimini.

Hadley agrees and says this distribution shuffle could be “a challenge to program.” He explains that an overall cap on an account, rather than an annual cap, is one that sponsors and recordkeepers are not accustomed to implementing.

SECURE 2.0 also prohibits highly compensated employees, as defined by the IRS, from contributing to sidecar accounts.

Tim Rouse, the executive director of the SPARK Institute, says this will likely be the greatest challenge to recordkeepers, since they do not have the needed payroll information to determine who counts as highly compensated and who does not. That status is also subject to change, and Rouse says this “could be problematic” and might be something that recordkeepers will have to work with payroll providers directly on to properly administer.

Hadley agrees that tracking highly compensated employee status will be the biggest difficulty from a recordkeeping perspective. He explains that either payroll systems or the recordkeeper will have to have to set up a block in their system to prevent HCEs from setting up sidecar accounts.

According to Hadley, contributions to the sidecar account do count toward the annual retirement deferral limit for 401(k) and 403(b) accounts, which this year is $22,500. This means if a participant put $2,500 in their sidecar, they could only contribute $20,000 to their retirement account.

SECURE 2.0 also says that plan sponsors may have reasonable regulations to prevent participants from contributing to their sidecar account merely to get matching contributions to their retirement account, then immediately withdrawing their own contribution. The industry will likely need additional regulatory guidance on this, according to Hadley.

A second provision of the new law would permit participants to withdraw up to $1,000 in a year from their retirement account to pay for an emergency. They must repay the $1,000 within three years in order to withdraw in this manner again, and they may repay the account through ordinary deferrals. A sponsor may rely on participant self-certification that they are using the money for an emergency.

Hadley explains that this provision is “much more open” than hardship withdrawals, as there is no requirement that the amount withdrawn equal the amount needed, and the plan itself it not required to check that the amount was indeed spent on an emergency. Some participants may withdraw for items that others might not consider a true emergency.

Though there is some potential for abuse, Hadley explains that this is “better than the alternative,” whereby a participant in an emergency has to go through a tedious verification process just to withdraw $1,000 or less.

Hadley expects that many recordkeepers will not be in a position to offer these provisions by 2024, when they are permitted, because they are not the main priority for either recordkeepers or plan sponsors, and the provisions create a number of challenges which will require regulatory guidance.

Doll Forecasts A ‘Shallow’ Recession in 2023

Market guru Bob Doll of Crossmark believes a mild recession is imminent due to the Fed’s continued monetary tightening to try and tame inflation.


Crossmark Global Investments CIO Bob Doll has weighed in with his 10 market predictions for 2023, including a “shallow recession” spurred in large part by the Federal Reserve’s quest to tame inflation.

In his annual predictions, Doll said the main focal points for 2023 will be the Fed’s monetary tightening policy, along with corporate earnings. He predicts economic weakness will come in part from the delayed impact of the Fed raising rates in a relatively short period of time last year, along with the likelihood of further hikes to 5% or more for the balance of 2023.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

“We acknowledge that the Fed could blink and acquiesce to a 3-4% inflation ‘for the time being,’ in which a soft landing might be possible,” Doll wrote. “But if the Fed insists on their 2% target, a recession is almost inevitable.”

Doll does see inflation declining “substantially,” but not to the 2% target being sought by the Fed over the long run. Despite the likely impact of higher interest rates, he sees the recession as mild due to “the cash on corporate balance sheets, a reasonably healthy corporate sector, and a relatively stronger banking system.”

In 2022, everyday 401(k) and 403(b) savers saw portfolio declines of 21% or more, according to some measures, as both stocks and bonds had negative returns for the first three quarters. Meanwhile, retirement plan withdrawals have hit their highest level since 2004, as workers seek to manage rising costs, Vanguard said in November.

Doll predicts the “lows of last October” for stocks to return this year due to economic growth fears, talk of recession and negative earnings revisions. Bonds, however, will rally during this period, he said, with the potential for a reversal later in the year as prospects pick up for 2024.

He believes corporate earnings will be revised downward as revenue growth slows and operating leverage puts pressure on profit margins.

Doll also weighed in on international trends, as well as politics, including a prediction of a double-digit field of U.S. presidential candidates as the Biden administration moves into its third year.

Doll’s full list of 10 predictions are:

  • The U.S. experiences a shallow recession, as real GDP will be among the lowest 10 of the last 50 years.

  • Inflation falls substantially, but remains above the Fed’s target of 2%.

  • The Federal Funds Rate reaches 5% and remains there for the balance of the year.

  • Earnings fall short of expectation in 2023 due to cost pressures and revenue shortfalls.

  • No major asset class is up or down by a double-digit percentage for only the fourth time this century.

  • Energy, consumer staple and financial sectors outperform utilities, technology and communication services as value beats growth.

  • The average active equity manager beats the index in 2023.

  • International stocks outperform U.S. ones for the second year in a row (first time since 2006 and 2007).

  • India surpasses China as the world’s largest population and is the fastest growing large economy.

  • A double-digit number of candidates announce they will run for U.S. president.
Last month, Doll gave himself a 7.5 out of 10 on his investment predictions for 2022. He said that was roughly in line with his long-term average of 7.0 to 7.5 out of 10.

«