PBGC Finalizes Premium Changes

The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) has issued a final rule implementing changes to premium due dates and calculations.

In July 2013, PBGC proposed rules to simplify due dates, coordinate the due date for terminating plans with the termination process, make conforming and clarifying changes to the variable-rate premium rules, give small plans more time to value benefits, and provide for relief from penalties, as well as other changes (see “PBGC Proposes Premium Changes”). In January 2014, the agency issued a final rule moving the flat-rate premium due date for large plans to later in the premium payment year (see “PBGC Moves Premium Date for Large Plans”). The current rule finalizes all other items in the proposal.

Under the final rule, small plans’ premiums will be due at the same time as large and mid-size plans’ premiums. However, because of a transition rule that gives small plans more time to adjust to the new provisions, the due dates will not be completely uniform until 2015. The final rule includes a chart of premium due dates going forward.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

For the special case of a plan terminating in a standard termination, the final premium might come due months after the plan closed its books and thus be forgotten. Correcting such defaults has been inconvenient for both plans and the PBGC, the agency says. To forestall such problems, PBGC is setting the final premium due date no later than the date when the post-distribution certification is filed. PBGC is also making conforming changes to other special case due date rules.

According to the agency, some small plans determine funding levels too late in the year to be able to use current-year figures for the variable-rate premium by the new uniform due date. To address this problem, it is providing that small plans generally use prior-year figures for the variable-rate premium (with a provision for opting to use current-year figures).

To facilitate the due date changes, a plan will generally be exempt from the variable-rate premium for the year in which it completes a standard termination or (if it is small) for the first year of coverage.

In response to inquiries from pension practitioners (see "Groups Recommend Changes to PBGCs Premium Proposal”), the agency is clarifying the computation of the premium funding target for plans in “at-risk” status for funding purposes.

PBGC assesses late premium payment penalties at 1% per month for filers that self-correct and 5% per month for those that do not. The differential is to encourage and reward self-correction. But both penalty schedules have had the same cap—100% of the underpayment—and once the cap was reached, the differential disappeared. To preserve the self-correction incentive and reward for long-overdue premiums, PBGC is reducing the 1% penalty cap from 100% to 50% of the underpayment. The agency is also codifying in its regulations the penalty relief policy for payments made not more than seven days late that it established in a Federal Register notice in September 2011 and is giving itself more flexibility in exercising its authority to waive premium penalties.

PBGC is also amending its regulations to accord with the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act and the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013 (see “PBGC Increases Some 2014 Premium Rates”) and to avoid retroactivity of PBGC’s rule on plan liability for premiums in distress and involuntary terminations.

The agency says this rulemaking is needed to make its premium rules more effective and less burdensome. The changes are generally applicable for plan years starting on or after January 1, 2014.

Text of the final rule is here.

Readiness of Older Employees Is Improving

Retirement readiness improved for Baby Boomers and Generation X households during 2013, says a new report.

A new analysis released by the Employee Benefit Research Institute (EBRI), “What Causes EBRI Retirement Readiness Ratings to Vary: Results from the 2014 Retirement Security Projection Model,” reveals that overall retirement income adequacy has improved in recent years and fewer households are likely to run short of money during retirement. However, factors such as age, income and access to an employer-sponsored 401(k)-type retirement plan can still produce substantial individual differences in readiness.

Findings from the report show that eligibility for participation in an employer-sponsored 401(k)-type plan remains one of the most important factors for achieving retirement income adequacy. Gen Xers in the lowest-income quartile with 20 or more years of future eligibility in a defined contribution plan are half as likely to run short of money as those with no years of future eligibility, the report shows. The impact of access to a 401(k)-type plan is also positive, but less pronounced, for those in the middle-income quartiles. EBRI’s research shows investors in the middle income range experience increases in retirement readiness ratings (a proprietary readiness measure from EBRI) of about 3% when given similar access to a defined contribution plan, increasing from 27.1% to 30.3%.

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

With regard to longevity and the high cost of health care, the report shows these two factors in particular can drive huge variations in retirement income adequacy. For both of these factors, a comparison between the most risky quartile—i.e. those most likely to experience high health care costs—with the least risky quartile shows a spread of approximately 30 percentage points in readiness for the lowest income range, approximately 25 to 40 percentage points for the highest income range, and even larger spreads for those in the middle income ranges.

The report also finds that annuities and long-term care insurance could mitigate much of the variability in retirement income adequacy experienced at or near retirement age. For example, the annuitization of a portion of a worker’s defined contribution and individual retirement account (IRA) balances may substantially increase the probability of not running short of money in retirement. In addition, the report notes that a well-functioning market in long-term care insurance could provide an extremely useful way to help control the volatility from the stochastic, long-term care risk, especially for those in the middle-income quartiles.

Future Social Security benefits make a huge difference for the retirement income adequacy of some households, notes the report, especially Gen Xers in the lowest-income quartile. If Social Security benefits are subject to proportionate decreases beginning in 2033 (when the Social Security Trust Fund is projected to run short of money), the retirement readiness values for those households are projected by EBRI to decreases from 20.9% to 10.3%.

“It would appear that while retirement income adequacy depends to a large degree on the household’s relative wage level and future years of eligibility in a defined contribution plan, a great deal of the variability in these values could be mitigated by appropriate risk-management techniques at or near retirement age,” concludes Jack VanDerhei, EBRI research director and author of the report.

The full report is published in the February EBRI Issue Brief at www.ebri.org.

«