Data & Research December 4, 2014

Plan Sponsors Increasing Encouragement to Save

PSCA’s 57th Annual Survey shows plan sponsors are increasing efforts to encourage retirement savings among employees.
Reported by

Savings rate suggestions, greater adoption of automatic enrollment and financial wellness programs are among efforts plan sponsors are making to improve employee retirement savings outcomes, finds the 57th Annual Survey of Profit Sharing and 401(k) Plans from the Plan Sponsor Council of America (PSCA).

Nearly 22% of companies surveyed said they provide a suggested savings rate to employees—18.8% suggest 6% and 46.5% suggest a rate higher than 6%. Half of all plans have an automatic enrollment feature, up from 47.2% in 2012, and 44% of all plans have an auto-escalation feature.

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

The survey found 16.7% of respondents offer a comprehensive financial wellness program to employees.

Account balances increased by 18.2% since last year. More than 88% of eligible participants have an account balance, and 80.3% of eligible participants contributed to their plans.

Companies reported they contributed an average of 4.7% of pay to their plans in 2013 (up from 4.5% in 2012 and 4.1% five years ago) Eighty percent of plans make a match on employee contributions and 98% of those plans made the match in 2013.

Forty percent of plans that do not offer auto-enroll state that they are satisfied with their participation rates and one-third (32.5%) cite corporate philosophy as why they do not use it. The survey found plans with an auto-enroll feature have participation rates 10 percentage points higher than plans that do not.

“Plan sponsors are spending more time and effort to educate, promote and encourage saving for the long-term,” says PSCA Executive Director Robert Benish. “They are making great strides in adopting new plan design features, investments and financial wellness programs that are making a positive impact on participant outcomes.”

For further information, or to purchase a copy of the survey report, go to http://www.psca.org/57thAS_Report.

Diversions December 4, 2014

More Wealth in Renting Homes

Buying a home may not always be the great investment most people think it is.
Reported by

Median-income households could generate more than 50% additional net wealth over the next 10 years by renting and investing instead of buying a home, according to “House of Cards,” a study from HelloWallet. The catch is that people have to invest to reap that extra money.

The report brings a new perspective to families’ unique decisions to buy or rent a home by analyzing the historical tax benefits and wealth-building opportunity costs of home ownership. The paper includes two analyses. The first examines historical home-purchase data from the Federal Reserve Board’s 2013 Survey of Consumer Finances and compares how much wealth Americans would have created had they rented a comparable home and invested any savings in a portfolio of stocks and bonds over the time they owned the home.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

The second looks at two hypothetical households, one earning $50,000 a year and the other $100,000, living in 20 major cities to examine the effect of state and local tax structures on the buy-versus-rent decision.

The analysis finds there are two things prospective home buyers can do as they weigh all the factors. First, calculate their “rent-to-price” ratio, or the ratio of the annual rental costs of a home compared with its purchase price, to determine whether to buy a home or rent and invest. If the rent-to-price ratio is 5% or less, people may be better off renting and investing any savings. If the rent-to-price ratio is greater than that, they may be better off buying.

Second, beware of online calculators. Many free online “buy-or-rent” calculators inflate the benefits of home buying. The study shows that calculators provide inaccurate guidance to more than 90% of renters who are considering whether to buy a home by overestimating tax benefits and underestimating the returns an individual can earn by investing. One reason: Most renters take the standard deduction on their tax returns instead of itemizing, but the calculators always assume that users will itemize.

Another flaw in the calculators is that most inaccurately assume there are no alternative investments to home buying other than putting the money in a savings account earning low (and risk-free) returns when renters could invest in a wide-variety of other vehicles, including a tax-advantaged individual retirement account (IRA), 529 college savings plan, or a defined contribution plan such as a 401(k).

Among other findings:

  • Median income homeowners realize no federal tax benefit in three out of four major cities;
  • More than half of current homeowners (more than 40 million households) bought homes during periods when average homebuyers would have been better off renting and investing; and
  • Americans should have access to advice that encourages them to consider investing in assets other than housing.

«