The site
hosts merged and updated content from the legacy firms—Segal Advisors acquired
the business of Rogerscasey earlier this year.
The website
features new publications, a section describing Segal Rogerscasey Canada, and
information dedicated to Rogerscasey, the firm’s
Advisors Solutions Group that serves financial services firms.
The
Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) is adopting regulations to
establish a schedule to phase in compliance with the clearing requirement under
new section 2(h)(1)(A) of the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA), enacted under Title
VII of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
(Dodd-Frank Act). The rules will become effective September 28.
As
previously proposed, a swap between two Category 1 Entities must comply with
the clearing requirement no later than 90 days after the publication of the
clearing requirement determination in the Federal Register. A swap between a Category
2 Entity and a Category 1 Entity or another Category 2 Entity must comply
within 180 days, and all other swaps must be submitted for clearing no later
than 270 days after the clearing requirement determination is published in the
Federal Register.
Category
2 Entities previously included employee benefit plans under ERISA, but under
the final rule, these plans will not be included in Category 2.
The
CFTC made this change in response to comments from the Committee on Investment
of Employee Benefit Assets (CIEBA), which stated that in-house ERISA funds
should be in the group with the longest compliance time, and not Category 2
Entities. CIEBA noted that such funds do not pose systemic risk, and they
typically rely upon third-party managers for some portion of their fund
management. Splitting in-house and external accounts (e.g. those accounts
meeting definition of Third-Party Subaccount and permitted 270 days) of the
same ERISA plan will impact risk management given different implementation
schedules.
CIEBA
also states that this distinction will cause pension funds to bear the costs of
compliance because they will need to comply prior to their third-party
managers, who would be better positioned to provide insight and service in this
regard.
Section
723(a)(3) of the Dodd-Frank Act amended the CEA to provide, under new section
2(h)(1)(A) of the CEA, that it shall be unlawful for any person to engage in a
swap unless that person submits such swap for clearing to a derivatives
clearing organization (DCO) that is registered under the CEA or a DCO that is
exempt from registration under the CEA if the swap is required to be cleared
(the clearing requirement). Section 2(h)(7) of the CEA provides an exception to
the clearing requirement when one of the counterparties to a swap (i) is not a
financial entity, (ii) is using the swap to hedge or mitigate commercial risk,
and (iii) notifies the Commission how it generally meets its financial
obligations associated with entering into a non-cleared swap.