Court Finds Amendment not Adopted per Plan Rules Invalid

A court has found that a defined contribution plan amendment liquidating two investment options was invalid because the sponsor did not follow amendment procedures dictated by the plan.

The Employee Benefits Institute of America (EBIA) reports that the court said the company offered no evidence that the plan’s amendment procedure had been followed. Instead, the company argued that an earlier plan amendment authorized the fund’s liquidation by members of the employee benefits committee (EBC). The court rejected this argument, though, finding that the earlier amendment only authorized freezing the funds—it did not require their liquidation.   

According to EBIA, the court also rejected the company’s alternative argument that the amendment was implicitly ratified by the notices and revised summary plan description (SPD) sent to participants about the funds’ elimination and by subsequent EBC consents and amendments. Ratification was not allowed by the plan’s specific amendment procedures, and even if it was permitted, no ratification had occurred.   

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

The harmful effect of the amendment was, in the court’s view, an additional sufficient basis to refrain from recognizing any “implied ratification.” Based on its analysis, the court held that the amendment was invalid, leaving in place the earlier version of the plan, which required that the stock funds remain in the plan “in a frozen state.”  

EBIA said the funds – which held shares of stock in a business that was previously part of the same conglomerate – were liquidated at a substantial loss to participants shortly before their value increased dramatically. Because the plan document listed the stock funds as available investment options, a plan amendment was required to authorize their liquidation. The plan’s amendment procedure specified that action by the employee benefits committee (EBC) was required to adopt any plan amendment, and that the EBC could act either by a majority vote or by a written instrument signed by a majority of its members. No EBC meeting was held, however, and only the EBC secretary signed the amendment to eliminate the funds.   

A participant brought a class action lawsuit for fiduciary breach to recover losses suffered by the plan due to liquidation of the funds. The case is Tatum v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 2011 WL 2160893 (MDNC 2011).

Founders Names New Financial Advisory Partner

Founders Financial Network, an independent, fee-only investment advisory firm and RIA, has selected Jovita Honor as its new partner.

Honor joins the firm with more than fourteen years of experience providing personal financial advice and counseling to families and individuals in all areas of their financial lives, ranging from investment management and college planning, to retirement and estate planning. 

Prior to joining Founders, Honor was a founding principal at Prialta Advisors. She previously worked as a financial adviser with Wade Financial Advisory, providing comprehensive financial planning and wealth management for Silicon Valley individuals.  

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

Honor graduated from the University of California, Berkeley, Walter Haas School of Business with a BS in Business Administration with emphasis in Finance and Real Estate. She is a Certified Financial Planner practitioner, an Enrolled Agent, and a member of the National Association of Personal Financial Advisers as a Registered Financial Adviser. Honor also holds the Certified Investment Management Analyst designation. 

“We are delighted to welcome Jovita,” said Robert Kresek, managing partner at Founders. “She is an exemplar of the independent high level financial guidance and client service that has continually defined Founders Financial Network and we are excited for her to add to the strength of our current leadership team.” 

«