Deals & People July 19, 2010

Winston & Strawn Brings on ERISA Litigator

Winston & Strawn LLP announced that Caryn L. Jacobs has joined its litigation department in Chicago as a partner. 

Reported by

Jacobs is a litigator focusing on securities, accounting and auditing professional liability, and Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) litigation, She joins Winston from Mayer Brown, where she was a partner and co-chair of that firm’s Securities Litigation and Corporate Governance Group.  

According to the announcement, after serving as a Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois’ Criminal Division and in private practice, Jacobs gained extensive civil experience in numerous cases involving professional accounting and auditing services, federal securities law, financial institutions, ERISA, and other high-stakes commercial disputes. She was awarded the Northern District of Illinois’s Award for Excellence in Pro Bono Service this year.   

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

Jacobs earned her J.D., cum laude, from Harvard Law School.  She also received an A.B., with distinction and with honors in humanities, from Stanford University.  

More information about the firm is at http://www.winston.com. 

Compliance July 19, 2010

Blackout Notice Suit Allowed to Move Forward

A federal judge in Ohio ruled that a 401(k) profit-sharing plan and two participants can press forward with their lawsuit alleging that Principal Life Insurance Co. breached its duty to make a timely notice of a plan blackout period. 

Reported by

U.S. District Judge Sara Lioi of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio ruled that Principal and various Principal entities named as defendants violated the 30-day blackout advance notice requirement in the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA).  

In making that ruling, Lioi rejected defense arguments that Principal was not plan administrator of the Roholt Vision Institute Inc. 401(K) Profit Sharing Plan. Lioi asserted that there was a “strong inference” that the defendants had been delegated the plan administrator role since they had control over a separate plan asset account. 

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

In addition to the defendants’ ability to exercise control over the plan assets, Lioi also pointed to the fact that the Principal announced the blackout only hours before it started. 

According to the opinion, Principal announced the blackout on September 25, 2008, that was to start the following morning and end three years after that. 

The participants claimed their account values dropped because of the inability to transfer assets during that time.

The case is Roholt Vision Institute Inc. 401(K) Profit Sharing Plan v. Principal Life Insurance Co., N.D. Ohio, No. 5:09-CV-02431. 

 

«