JPMorgan not Liable for WaMu Retirement Plan Mismanagement

JPMorgan Chase & Co. cannot be held liable for mismanagement that may have occurred before the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. seized Washington Mutual, Inc., a judge has ruled.

The Associated Press reported that in the decision handed down last week, U.S. District Judge Marsha J. Pechman also dismissed as a defendant in the lawsuit Kerry K. Killinger, chief executive of WaMu from 1990 until shortly before it ran aground in September 2008. The lawsuit claims the retirement plans were poorly managed and monitored and participants should have been advised by fund managers that WaMu stock was increasingly risky well before the bank’s collapse.

The former WaMu employees assert that responsibility for the actions of former WaMu executives regarding the retirement plans should transfer to JPMorgan, which bought the failed bank after it was seized. However, Pechman previously suggested that making a new owner liable for a failed bank’s lack of fiduciary responsibility in managing 401(k) accounts could make it harder for the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.(FDIC) to arrange future takeovers of teetering banks (see “September Ruling Expected in WaMu 401(k) Cases”).

In her opinion, Pechman said that to hold JPMorgan responsible, she would have to find that the FDIC had the legal authority to transfer liability for prior 401(k) fund management with the purchase and that the federal agency did so. “Allowing plaintiffs to proceed against JPMC (JPMorgan) runs the risk of expanding the FDIC’s jurisdiction well beyond its statutory reach,” she wrote.

Steve W. Berman, an attorney for the former employees, said he would move to challenge the ruling in the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, according to the AP. Berman also said Pechman eventually will be asked to make the retirement case a class-action lawsuit.

Pechman let stand some claims against former members of the human resources committee of WaMu’s board of directors and against members of the Plan Investment Committee and Plan Management Committee, both of which are fiduciaries of the 401(k) plans.

Many Turn to Advisers for Roth Conversion Help

A Charles Schwab survey found most high-income Americans want financial advisers to help them determine if a Roth conversion is right for them.

On January 1, when the income restriction is lifted, many investors will have the opportunity to convert to a Roth IRA. Currently, only people with modified adjusted gross incomes of $100,000 or less are eligible to convert.

Despite the pending changes, most Americans in the previously excluded income bracket are not planning to convert to a Roth, according to the Charles Schwab survey. Nearly three-fourths (72%) of Americans making more than $100,000 annually are not planning to convert.

More than half (61%) of respondents are not even aware of the changes taking place. Of those that are aware, there is still uncertainty: More than one quarter (26%) find it more confusing than health care reform, and more than a third (34%) are unsure of the general benefits of a Roth IRA versus a traditional IRA.

However, most of the surveyed high-income Americans (71%) said they would like to consult with a financial adviser about the Roth IRA conversion rule changes. Forty-nine percent would like to consult a tax planner.

Slightly less than a third (32%) of respondents already have a Roth IRA as part of their retirement savings strategy. Of those respondents, 50% cite the benefits of tax-free investment growth as the primary motivation to have a Roth IRA.

Charles Schwab surveyed 400 Americans making $100,000 or more.

«