CFA Institute Renames Certificate in ESG Investing
According to the CFA Institute, the curriculum underpinning the certificate will continue to cover ‘the wide variety of factors within each of the environmental, social, and governance areas of ESG investing.’
Beginning April 8, the CFA Institute’s certificate in ESG Investing will be renamed the Sustainable Investing Certificate.
According to the CFA Institute, “Since the certificate first launched, the concept of ESG investing has evolved and has, at times, had varied meanings in different markets. The term ‘sustainable investing’ now more accurately captures the broader, long-term impact and investing goals that the certificate aims to support.”
The name change comes four years after the certificate was launched. While the name has changed, the actual curriculum that underpins the certificate will continue to cover “the wide variety of factors within each of the environmental, social, and governance areas of ESG investing.”
According to the CFA Institute, it will “update the name on the digital certificate and badge earned when anyone passed the Certificate in ESG Investing exam. Starting on 8 April 2025, the badge and certificate will use the new ‘Sustainable Investing Certificate’ name.”
By using this site you agree to our network wide Privacy Policy.
State Street Global Advisors joins BlackRock, which recently scrapped its ‘aspirational workforce representation goals’ and will no longer require hiring managers to interview a diverse pool of candidates.
Eight years after it championed the Fearless Girl campaign, which pushed for the representation of women in senior leadership positions, State Street Global Advisors has ditched its gender diversity efforts.
SSGA previously pushed for listed companies to have at least one female board member, while the boards of listed companies have at least 30% female directors.
The $4.7 trillion asset manager ditched these expectations in its March “Summary of Material Changes to State Street Global Advisors’ 2025 Proxy Voting and Engagement Policy.”
SSGA stated that it recognizes that many factors may influence board composition, including board size, geographic location and local regulations, among others.
“As such, our fundamental belief is that our role is not to be prescriptive, but that nominating committees are best placed to determine the most effective board composition and degree of diverse experiences and perspectives represented in the boardroom,” SSGA stated.
In a 2023 proxy voting and engagement guideline, SSGA stated that if a company does not meet its expectations, SSGA may vote against the chair of the board’s nominating committee or, in the absence of such a committee, the board leader.
“Additionally, if a company does not meet the applicable expectation for three consecutive years, State Street Global Advisors may vote against all incumbent members of the nominating committee or those persons deemed responsible for the nomination process,” SSGA stated at the time.
The about-turn comes eight years since SSGA’s Fearless Girl campaign. Around that time, SSGA called out 1,228 companies for lacking gender diversity on their boards, prompting 300 companies to add a female director following the campaign’s commencement, while another 28 committed to do so.
SSGA joins BlackRock, which recently scrapped its “aspirational workforce representation goals” and will no longer require hiring managers to interview a diverse pool of candidates, according to an internal memo from CEO Larry Fink and senior executives.
The memo, sent to staff in February, said delivering for clients requires attracting the best people globally and that BlackRock is “committed” to creating a culture that welcomes “diverse people and perspectives to foster creative solutions and avoid groupthink.”
“At the same time, we operate in one of the most highly regulated industries globally and are committed to following the law in every respect,” the memo stated.
Among President Donald Trump’s cavalcade of executive orders upon taking office in January were two aimed at ending diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives. Trump directed U.S. agencies “to combat illegal private-sector DEI preferences, mandates, policies, programs, and activities.”