RBG Adds Southern California Team

Conor Weir and Sophois Sokhom have joined Retirement Benefits Group to provide retirement consulting services to clients in Long Beach, California.

Weir will serve as a managing director and financial consultant. He is responsible for retirement plan design, participant advising, investment management, fiduciary risk management, business succession planning and planned giving. Before joining RBG, Weir built his practice at Merrill Lynch. Focusing on managing retirement plans during the last three years, Weir’s team accumulated approximately $60 million in client assets. Weir holds a bachelor’s degree in sociology and philosophy from Carleton College in Northfield, Minnesota, and a master’s of business administration with a concentration in finance from Oxford.

As director of client relations, Sokhom’s primary focus will be ensuring the firm’s clients receive the necessary expertise and attention to pursue their financial goals. Sokhom has extensive experience in risk management, insurance, annuities and financial planning from her diverse background at companies including Merrill Lynch, Robert Half Executive Recruiting and Andersen Consulting. She holds a bachelor’s degree in economics from Carleton College and a master’s of business administration with a focus in finance from the University of St. Thomas in Minnesota. She holds the certified financial planner (CFP), chartered retirement plans specialist (CRPS) and chartered retirement planning counselor (CRPC) designations.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

As well as managing a number of retirement plans, Weir and Sokhom serve as chief financial officer to families and business owners. Their team specializes in managing the overlap between business and personal wealth, managing retirement plans and helping individual clients plan for their own retirements. 

The decision to join Retirement Benefits Group stemmed from their desire to align the firm with one that is focused on retirement planning, Weir said in a statement, citing Retirement Benefits Group’s expertise and array of tools. “We will also benefit from additional freedom in terms of the providers we work with and methods in which we price plans,” he said.

Retirement Benefits Group is a network of retirement plan consultants with headquarters in Southern California and 13 affiliate offices nationwide.

DOL Explains Drop in 2014 Collections Number

The DOL’s Employee Benefits Security Administration says a substantial year-over-year drop in the agency’s reported collection totals for 2014 is the result of a change in reporting technique.

The Department of Labor’s (DOL) Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA) says industry speculation that a major drop in the reported dollar value of civil and criminal collections made on behalf of employee benefit plans in 2014 is the result of weaker efficiency or a shift in auditing policy misses the mark.

As explained in EBSA’s recently published 2014collection and enforcement action fact sheet, the agency’s investigators recovered $599.7 million in direct reimbursements for employee benefit plans and participants during 2014. The total come from 3,928 civil investigations closed by EBSA in 2014, with 2,541 of those cases (64.7%) resulting in monetary compensation for plans or other corrective action. The previous year, EBSA reported more than double the monetary collections arising from 3,677 closed investigations, in which violations were found nearly 73% of the time. Taken together, plan sponsors paid a collective $1.7 billion in plan reimbursements and fines to EBSA to settle criminal cases and civil violations in 2013. (The 2013 numbers are reported here.)

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

Responding to industry questions around the cause of what appeared to be a major yearly decline in collections, EBSA says the top-line drop from 2013’s reported $1.7 billion to 2014’s reported $599.7 million does not tell the whole collections story. The agency provided an explanation of the nominal decline to PLANADVISER:

“The 2013 and 2014 numbers are not apples-to-apples,” the agency explains. “EBSA changed the report [this year], so that the ~$600 million for 2014 includes only dollars that went back into people’s pockets—both plans and participants—and does not include categories such as “prohibited transactions corrected” that are part of the 2013 and previous years’ numbers. So the difference in the numbers reflects a change in reporting for 2014, not a dramatic decrease in recoveries. If anything, the $600 million is a better reflection of the actual dollars going back to plans and participants.”

EBSA also tells PLANADVISER its emphasis has been on helping field offices and the public understand and focus on actual dollars going back into people’s pockets. “We are still tracking other categories of monetary recoveries,” EBSA says, “but what you see in the 2014 report is the most accurate reflection of real money going back to plans and participants.”

For an apples-to-apples comparison number, EBSA suggests a better 2014 number to use is $823.2 million. The explanation continues: “One thing to add, and it is important context, is that the larger 2013 number included one prohibited transaction correction (which is one of the big categories EBSA did not put in the headline 2014 number that was reported online) representing about $500 million. While you do see a drop from the $1.6 billion for 2013 and the $823 million for 2014, a major piece of that was a result of a single case.”

Additionally, EBSA says its reporting for 2014 did not count results from the Abandoned Plan Program, which provides remedies for plans lacking a sponsor or plan trustees—for example if the owner of a small business dies without a succession plan in place. Taking this into account, EBSA says the two numbers that are 100% relatable by categories included for 2014 and 2013 are $581.3 million and $499.7 million, respectively.

“We are still tracking and using all of the numbers,” EBSA concludes. “We have simply changed the format of what we are presenting to the public, to give to the public what we think is the most useful and relevant data.”

«