PSNC 2012: Defining Success

At the 2012 PLANSPONSOR National Conference, plan sponsor panelists shared their retirement plan success tactics, such as mandatory enrollment meetings and personalized communication.  

Roger Buchtman, controller at Fort Wayne Metals Research Products Corp., said his company requires employees to attend annual open enrollment meetings for its 401(k) plan, and those who opt out must complete an acknowledgment form. “Our ultimate goal is 100% participation,” Buchtman said. “We know we may never get there but that’s what we try to achieve.” 

The company has 95% participation, including full-time and part-time employees—part-timers make up about 8% of the company’s work force. The company match is 50% up to 7% of base salary, and the plan also offers profit sharing at 2% of earnings. 

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

Buchtman said the mandatory annual enrollment meetings are important for targeting those who may have reduced or stopped their contributions because of the economy or other financial issues. The company also targets employees over age 50.

Aimee Lowry, benefits division chief of the Fairfax County government in Virginia, said it is important for employees to have individualized retirement readiness goals because different age groups have different needs. “We are challenged by an evolving work force,” she said.

For instance, the younger work force is more transient than older generations and therefore may have several retirement plans throughout their lives. 

Fairfax County offers a holistic approach to retirement that includes financial and physical readiness. It has a “strong retiree medical program,” Lowry said, as well as financial programs. If employees become financially healthy, she said participation rates will improve.

In Lowry’s opinion, nothing beats meeting face-to-face to understand what employees really need. “I truly believe there is no substitute for boots on the ground,” she said. “So we really have sort of immersed ourselves.”

In addition to meeting in person, Fairfax has print campaigns in multiple languages. Because it has such a diverse work force ranging from doctors to landscapers, Lowry said specialized communication is key.

Bob Tomaschko, director of compensation, retirement & HRMS at Land O’Lakes, echoed the importance of communication in improving retirement readiness and participation rates. Despite his company offering automatic enrollment and helpful tools to prepare employees, he said it does not substitute for traditional communication. In fact, he said communication is even more vital when auto features are in place. "We do believe that we have to be out there providing communication and education to our participants,” he said.

Tomaschko is also a believer in advice, which he said can generate higher returns for participants. Many participants at his company have accessed the available online advice and it has received a positive response.

Tomaschko anticipates an increased prevalence of managed accounts in the industry as a whole.

Asset Allocation Not Greatest Influence on Retirement Security

Adopting the perfect mix of stocks and bonds for retirement investments is not the greatest guarantee of saving enough for a secure retirement, a study contends.

Households nearing retirement have more effective levers available, including delaying retirement, taking a reverse mortgage and controlling spending, according to the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College (CRR). Each one – and particularly working longer – is a more potent alternative to asset allocation for most households, its analysis shows.  

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

In its comparison, the CRR found at a retirement age of 62, 74% of households fall short of their target replacement rate, but delaying retirement to age 67 reduces this figure to 47%. In addition, at age 62, the percent of households falling short drops by 7 percentage points if households take a reverse mortgage and by 3 percentage points if households follow the control spending strategy.   

In contrast, investing assets in “riskless equities” shaves off only 1 percentage point. Results at age 67 show a larger effect for each of these strategies, but the pattern is identical. Asset allocation remains the least effective option, even assuming that equities are riskless.  

The CRR says it is not surprising that asset allocation is less effective than the alternatives given that most households have only modest financial assets. Therefore, it narrowed the analysis to the top decile of the wealth distribution, which includes households with more than $500,000 in financial wealth. Because these households are wealthier, a lower share fall short at age 62 even in the base case – just 39%.   

However, if top-decile households worked to 67, the share falling short drops to 17%. The alternative levers of a reverse mortgage, controlling spending and riskless asset allocation, have roughly equivalent effects on wealthy households. So even for the high-wealth group, asset allocation is no better than the other levers.  The full CRR brief can be downloaded from here.

«