Outdated Mortality Table ERISA Suit Filed in Arizona

The lawsuit alleges that Pinnacle West, an electric utility, used outdated mortality tables, causing it to underestimate the present value of employee pensions.


Former employees of Pinnacle West, an electric utility company in Arizona, allege that the company used outdated and unreasonable actuarial tables to undervalue their defined benefit pension benefits by underestimating the participants’ life expectancy.

The Employee Retirement Income Security Act suit was filed in the Federal District Court of Arizona.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

The beneficiaries of Pinnacle’s retirement plan earned benefits in the form of a single life annuity, or SLA. The SLA then makes monthly payments to the beneficiary upon retirement. The plan also offered a joint survivor annuity, or JSA, which makes payments to a surviving beneficiary, typically a spouse, after the death of the participant. The JSA must be actuarially equivalent to an SLA, discounted for the possibility that the spouse will outlive the participant up to a statutory maximum.

In calculating the present value of either annuity, the plan must account for future interest rates and the life expectancy of the participant using a reasonable mortality table. Underestimating the life expectancy of a participant by using an outdated mortality table, would likely result in the pension’s value being underestimated.

The suit alleges that Pinnacle used an actuarial table published in 1971 for calculating the JSA, which drew on life expectancy data from the 1960s, to estimate the life expectancy of plan participants. According to the suit, a 65 -year-old man on the 1971 table is estimated to live another 15.2 years, but a more updated table, published in 2014, says the same man should expect to live another 21.6 years. Plaintiffs Joseph Peck and Jerome Skrtich retired from Pinnacle in 2018 and 2021, respectively, and were enrolled in a JSA plan.

This would have the effect of reducing the “present value” of the JSA since it is projected into the future for fewer years and therefore also reduces the monthly payments paid out to the plaintiffs all else being equal. Peck’s pension was undervalued by $47,000, according to the suit, which translated to a reduction of $191.39 per month. Skrtich’s pension was undervalued by $17,000, which resulted in a monthly reduction of $62.91. The suit seeks class action status to include all beneficiaries affected.

 “By failing to pay JSA benefits in amounts that are actuarially equivalent to the single life annuities offered to participants under the plan, defendants cause retirees to lose part of their vested retirement benefits in violation of ERISA,” the plaintiffs argue.

When asked for comment, a representative of Pinnacle said, “we have received and are currently reviewing the complaint,” and declined to comment further.

The suit also alleges that Pinnacle used modern actuarial mortality tables in estimating their plan’s liabilities for the purpose of setting utility prices. Pinnacle passed these hypothetical pension costs onto their customers by requesting an increase in utility prices from the Arizona Corporation Commission, which was approved. Utility costs increased in Arizona by a combined $165.9 million to cover increased pension costs, but Pinnacle only applied the modern tables to calculating pension cost for the purpose of setting utility prices, and not for the pension pay-outs themselves, and therefore did not actually increase the pension pay-outs, which was ostensibly the justification for the cost increase in the first place.

Additionally, the plaintiffs allege that Pinnacle assumed a 4.3% female workforce when calculating the present value of a beneficiary’s pension, when the female workforce of Pinnacle is actually 25%. Since women tend to live longer than men, undercounting them in this calculation results in the present value being underestimated. Also, though men have made greater life expectancy gains than women since 1971 (closing, but not ending the gender gap) these gains have not been included in the calculation, since the mortality tables used by Pinnacle have not been updated.

The plaintiffs asked the court for compensatory damages and an injunction against future infractions.

The full complaint is available here.

Inflation Concerns Have Spiked for Investors, with Retirement Effects

Investors who work with an adviser or financial professional are more likely to have a plan to generate income in retirement.


Inflation anxiety is spiking for investors, driving down retirement confidence for many retirement savers, new Nationwide Retirement Institute data shows

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

The Nationwide Advisor Authority survey shows 48% of advisers and financial professionals are optimistic about their 12-month financial outlook, a 15-percentage point decrease from last year. 

Investors’ inflation concerns in the next 12 months spiked this year, to 46% from 29% in 2021 and 17% in 2020, the survey data shows. The report also finds that managing volatility is a top financial concern for 15% of investors, down from 18% last year and 22% in 2020.

“While it’s surprising that expectations about volatility have dropped among investors, it may indicate that they are coming to grips with the possibility that volatility is the new normal,” says Mark Hackett, chief of investment research, in a press release. “While investor concerns have lessened, both volatility and inflation are likely to persist in the year ahead. Financial professionals should be talking to clients about implications for their portfolio.”

Inflation and volatility have deflated retirement confidence over the last 12 months, which is indicated by respondents’ changed retirement plans, the survey shows.

The survey asked investors how their retirement plans have changed over the last year and 20% said they plan to retire later than planned, 47% plan to retire at about the same time and 12% earlier than planned. Another 12% don’t know if they ever will be able to retire and 9% don’t know or are unsure, the data shows.   

Among investors, additional top concerns are taxes at 22%, compared to 27% in 2021 and 15% in 2020.

Nationwide finds 85% of investors working with a financial professional have a strategy to protect themselves against outliving their savings in retirement, compared to 52% of investors who are not working with a financial professional.  

The survey shows 87% of investors who have a financial plan agree that working with a financial professional helps them feel more confident to make the right investment decisions, even during a financial crisis and among that group, 40% said they strongly agree. Among investors,89%, agree working with a financial professional helps them feel more confident about making the right investment decisions, even in a financial crisis, according to the survey.  

The survey also shows 85% of investors working with an adviser or financial professional have a strategy to generate guaranteed income in retirement, compared to 58% of investors who are not working with a financial professional.  

Additionally, Nationwide finds 55% of investors currently work with an adviser or financial professional, compared to 63% last year and 67% in 2020. 

The survey also shows discrepancies between the levels of concern for investors and financial professionals about an economic recession in the next 12 months. 

Nationwide finds 74% of investors are concerned about a recession as are 82% of financial professionals. 

For investors and financial professionals, the study notes “recession concerns mirror levels seen at [the] height of [COVID], in 2020: 75% for investors and 77% for professionals.

The Advisor Authority Survey was conducted online by the Harris Poll for Nationwide Advisory Solutions from July 27 to August 16, among 506 financial advisers and 521 investors, ages 18 and over.

«