Knowing what benefits Social Security and Medicare provide and the best age to start benefits is the first step in retirement planning,
according to Mercer.
Mercer’s 2016 Guide to Social Security and 2016 Medicare
booklet give simple explanations of both national programs, recent changes, and
cost and benefit amounts for 2016—including many real-life examples.
The 2016 Guide to Social Security is a 64-page booklet that
includes vital information about the following topics:
Major
Social Security program changes for 2016;
Retirement
benefits—early, late and delayed retirement information, with examples;
Disability
and survivor benefits;
Who
receives benefits;
Easy-reference
monthly benefit tables;
Medicare
benefits overview—eligibility and enrollment;
“To
Do” section; and
Answers
to frequently asked questions about Social Security.
Mercer’s 2016 Medicare booklet is 32 pages and includes:
Major
Medicare changes for 2016;
What
is covered and not covered;
Enrollment
and eligibility;
Part A
(Hospital Insurance);
Part B
(Medical Insurance);
Part C
(Medicare Advantage Plans); and
Part D
(Outpatient Prescription Drug Plan).
The minimum order for the Guide is 25 copies at $7.95 each.
Quantity discounts are available, e.g., 100 copies are $6.95 each. The minimum
order for the Medicare booklet is 100 copies at $3.95 each. Quantity discounts
are available, e.g., 500 copies are $3.55 each.
Visit www.imercer.com/socialsecurity or
call 800-333-3070 for more information and to purchase Mercer’s 2016 Guide to
Social Security or 2016 Medicare booklet.
By using this site you agree to our network wide Privacy Policy.
Health Care Expense Tools Struggle to Capture a Complex Reality
Retirement savings levels needed for those with cancer,
cardiovascular disease, Type 2 diabetes and other health issues vary
considerably from the general population—and from patient to patient.
New research from Empower Institute suggests specific health conditions create disparate retirement savings needs for people at the same age and wealth level, necessitating more thoughtful predictions of the cost of care in retirement. The report, “An Apple a Day: The Impact of Health Conditions on the Required Savings for Healthcare,” denotes some important ways health costs and related mortality projections can have counter-intuitive effects on retirement planning, especially when comparing the projected lifetime health care expenses of retirees with/without these chronic conditions.
As the report explains, for the average American, the primary health care-related expenses in retirement are going to come in the form of premiums for Medicare parts B and D, along with any supplemental insurance purchased on exchanges or in the private markets. Out-of-pocket expenses will also be significant for most people, according to Empower, coming in the form of “copays and cost sharing related to medical treatments and medications.”
Most of today’s (trusted) health care cost prediction tools can factor in these basic elements, but Empower’s report warns these more-predictable costs are just one part of the picture. The report shows that, while the general terms of this expense formula hold across individuals, any given retirement saver could face a substantially different expense arc. One of the most counterintuitive aspects of the expense projection effort is that, depending on how the individual’s treatment for one or more of the aforementioned chronic diseases goes, getting that disease can actually decrease one’s anticipated lifetime health care expenditure. Sadly, this is because it’s cheaper in general to die sicker, younger than it is to live healthily into one’s late 80s, 90s or beyond.
Empower shows that for a healthy 65-year-old male retiree, cumulative savings of approximately $144,000 would be required to fund general health care expenses for a projected retirement period of approximately 20 years at a 90% confidence level. For women, the amount is $156,000.
“Simply factoring in the additional expenses associated with one (or more) of the aforementioned diseases dramatically impacts the expense picture,” the report continues. “However, in many cases the higher retiree health care costs of conditions such as diabetes and tobacco use are actually offset by reduced life expectancy. The net effect is that, in certain health states, less savings are required for health care.”
NEXT: More counterintuitive numbers
Empower finds medical conditions such as cancer, diabetes,
cardiovascular disease and high cholesterol require markedly different medical
costs per year under Medicare, so any advanced prediction tools should be able
to account for this. Usually the result will be that individuals getting these
diseases will spend less on health care in retirement—though the annual rate of
expenses will be much greater.
“Ironically, individuals in excellent health may face the
highest overall medical expenses because they are projected to live the
longest,” Empower says. “For example, the savings required for a 65-year-old
female to confidently fund health care expenses range from a low of $111,000
(Type 2 diabetes) to a high of $156,000 (in good health)—even though having
diabetes will cause higher annual costs.”
As people live longer and medical technology advances, such questions
about what is included in retirement health care cost projections will only
become more pressing and more difficult, Empower says. The paper even predicts
such seemingly trivial factors as blood pressure and cholesterol levels during
the approach to retirement age could become informative predictors of how much an
individual may need to save for health care—or not.
“The study shows that high blood pressure is highly
prevalent among pre-retiree households. However, high blood pressure is very
treatable through medication and dietary changes. As such, it has a negligible
effect on life expectancy,” Empower explains. The study found that the life
expectancy for someone with high blood pressure is only one year less than that
of healthy individual, so long as the condition is treated effectively.
“The same cannot be said for all health conditions,” Empower
warns. “Diabetes, cancer and tobacco use present a much greater variance in the
probability of survival and life expectancy numbers are shown to drop more
significantly compared to a healthy individual, according to the study.”
NEXT: What it all
means moving forward
Of course, the work of improving retirement health care cost
predictions won’t be easy. Getting people to think about their future
health and mortality is even more difficult than getting them to think about their
future finances.
“This is an effort to bring greater clarity to a largely
ignored aspect of retirement planning,” explains W. Van Harlow, director of
research for the Empower Institute. “There’s no question that there is a
significant population of households who could benefit from incorporating
health state into their view of retirement medical costs.” Harlow further
observes that data from an earlier study, the Lifetime Income Score V, “shows
that only one of five households is expected to be healthy as they enter
retirement.”
The study explains the Empower Institute’s proprietary
formula for health cost predictions, which combines elements of health-specific
mortality risk with investment return uncertainty to help determine the amount
of savings required to fund future healthcare expenses. “The study indicates
that required health care savings differ significantly when putting factors like
actuarial tables and Medicare expenses into the overall equation,” Harlow
notes.
He concludes that, while the study highlights the need to
make health care a core component of retirement planning, it also offers
participants and advisers an opportunity to “cut through some of the murkiness
in decision-making. With more information and greater clarity, participants
should have greater confidence in the decisions they make about investing,
financial planning and ultimately retiring.”