HSA Balances See Upward Trend, Despite Increase Healthcare Spending

Recent EBRI data reveal a rising average in health savings account balances, despite employees frequently using them for short-term spending.

New data from the Employee Benefit Research Institute indicate that amid escalating healthcare costs and out-of-pocket expenses, average balances in health savings accounts have continued to rise since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The average HSA balance rose to $4,418 at the end of 2022 from $2,711 at the start of the year, the most recent data available in EBRI’s database, given that participants can still contribute to 2023 HSAs until taxes are due in April.

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

Jake Spiegel, a research associate at EBRI, says he sees this trend continuing in 2023 and into the start of 2024 as well.

EBRI’s analysis revealed two predominant factors associated with higher average account balances. The first was that age is strongly associated with higher HSA balances: the older the accountholder, the higher the average balance.

“When you’re young, you tend to have less disposable income, so you’re able to spend less to begin with [compared with] somebody who’s been established in [their] career for a few years,” Spiegel explains.

Older workers also tend to incur more health care expenses than younger workers, hence the need, and willingness, to contribute more to their HSAs.

In addition, EBRI found that account tenure is strongly associated with higher balances. The longer someone has had their account, the more contributions he and his employer are likely to have made.

Most accountholders in EBRI’s database—which analyzes more than 14 million HSAs—took a distribution in 2022, with an average withdrawal of $1,868. However, relatively few accountholders spent down their entire accounts, suggesting that many participants are aware of, and reaping, the tax advantages—tax-free contributions, tax-free growth and tax-free withdrawal for health care costs—that HSAs offer.

The report explained that workers view HSAs through different lenses, as some view the accounts as a short-term spending account to be used when out-of-pocket costs crop up, whereas others view them as longer-term savings vehicles.

“The financial wellness gurus [often] say, ‘contribute as much as you can and never take distributions and don’t touch that money until retirement,’” Spiegel says. “But the fact of the matter is: That advice is not appropriate for everybody.”

Spiegel argues that it is not necessarily a “bad thing” that employees are using their HSAs as short-term spending vehicles, because the accounts are still helping people stretch their health care dollars further than they otherwise could.  

EBRI also found that accountholders who received an employer contribution to their HSA were more likely to have taken a distribution than accountholders who did not receive an employer contribution, and they took larger distributions on average. This is likely because those who receive employer contributions may feel more comfortable taking larger distributions, knowing that their employer’s contribution added to their account balances.

Spiegel adds that employees who do not receive an employer contribution tend to contribute more themselves, whereas those who do receive an employer contribution tend to contribute less. However, the employer contribution makes up for the lower employee contribution and ultimately results in a higher account balance.

He says accountholders with higher balances are also more likely to invest their HSAs.

In general, EBRI found that relatively few HSAs are invested, as only 13% of accountholders invested their HSAs in assets other than cash. Spiegel says it is not wise for employees to invest their HSA balances in risky asset classes, especially if they expect to use the funds in the shorter term.

However, the report stated that if accountholders have a large enough buffer in liquid accounts to weather a larger, unexpected health care expense, then they may be better off at retirement by investing some portion of their HSAs.

EBRI concluded that providing an employer contribution to an HSA, or even allowing for them to be invested, will not automatically cause an investor to treat his HSA as a long-term savings vehicle, but plan sponsors and administrators do play a “critical role” in helping accountholders understand the long-term tax advantages and financial wellness benefits of contributing to an HSA.

Social Security Administration to Relax Overpayment Clawback Rules

SSA Commissioner Martin O’Malley also laid out the agency’s customer service issues.

Social Security Administration Commissioner Martin O’Malley announced on Wednesday that the SSA would be softening the process for recovering overpayments from beneficiaries.

When a beneficiary of Social Security receives an overpayment, the SSA can withhold the entirety of the beneficiary’s subsequent benefit payments if they are non-responsive to repayment requests. The SSA now will move away from this “heavy-handed practice” and instead reduce the withholding amount to 10%, as of March 25.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

Additionally, the SSA will shift the burden of proof in assigning fault for overpayments from the beneficiary to the SSA and the administration will extend the maximum repayment window to 60 months from 36. It will also make it easier for those unable to pay to apply for repayment waivers.

The SSA did not specify how the waiver process would be made easier, and O’Malley suggested during a hearing Wednesday hosted by the Senate Committee on Finance’s subcommittee on aging that an easier waiver process might only be available in the short term. O’Malley said the SSA would ease the process “for now.”

At the hearing, O’Malley also said the SSA was in a “customer service crisis,” and average wait times at call centers were 39 minutes nationwide. He added that it takes an average of eight months to receive a determination on disability eligibility and another seven months to get a hearing if an applicant files an appeal.

O’Malley attributed the call center delays to low funding for the SSA and to high turnover. He argued that the SSA operates with an overhead of 1% of outlays, while private sector insurers have an overhead of 12% or more. He added that since wait times are long, many beneficiaries “are coming into that call hot,” and their anger results in call center workers being stressed and overworked, which results in an annual turnover rate of 24%, according to O’Malley.

O’Malley explained that the agency is making progress by allowing beneficiaries and their attorneys to complete more processes online so that they do not have to use the call centers as much, but other issues, such as funding, require Congressional intervention.

«