WIPN Connects Women in Retirement Sector With Male Sponsors

The retirement group launched an ally program after finding that active connections and recommendations had a bigger impact on women’s career advancement than ‘mentorship.’
WIPN Connects Women in Retirement Sector With Male Sponsors

WIPN—We Inspire. Promote. Network—an organization for women working in the retirement industry, has for years fostered mentorship and networking opportunities among its members to advance diversity, equity and inclusion in the widely male-dominated retirement plan industry. A couple of years ago, however, the group started a proprietary research program that unearthed an interesting finding.

“We found that women were over-mentored and under-sponsored,” says Rosalyn Brown, WIPN’s vice president, referring to contacts who help advance careers through promotions or even job recommendations at other firms. “We found that, when we incorporated men into our research, most of them have a sponsor, but not women. All of sudden, a light bulb went on.”

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

From there, Brown and her team started work on a program to match women in the retirement plan sector with male sponsors. Called Allies in Action, the program launched in March with about 14 women paired with men committed to putting them in touch with actionable contacts in the industry. The women in the program come from a range of roles and experience levels, Brown says, including sales managers, service managers and technology experts.

Rosalyn Brown

Brown notes that women often gravitate toward a mentor in the workplace to work through projects and issues within their firm—vital partners, but sometimes a bit more on the “warm and fuzzy” side of workplace connections. Meanwhile, women are less likely, according to the research, to lean on contacts known as sponsors to connect them with industry players who can help with promotions, moving across divisions or even going to another organization altogether.

“A sponsorship may not be someone you keep in contact with or someone you have known for years,” Brown says. “It is really and truly someone who has the capability to move forward your career, and we wanted to make that happen. We’ve identified the problem, and we’ve put together a solution.”

This session of Allies in Action will run through the year. From there, Brown says, WIPN will gather the results and consider how the program should evolve next year.

She notes that, through WIPN’s near-15-year history, men have often asked how they can participate or help, considering membership is, by design, only for women.

“It fixed two things that we keep hearing: men who say, ‘I want to help, I want to do more,’ and then the women who say, ‘I am looking for a sponsor,’” she says. “Even in our launch conversation with the men, I remember one of the quotes was, ‘I’m looking forward to learning some things, too,’ which I thought was amazing. Because it should be mutually beneficial, and sometimes we miss that.”

Need Remains

WIPN has been working to advance opportunities for women in the retirement plan industry going back to 2009. In research the firm released in May 2023, it found that an average of three out of 10 women in the retirement industry said their caregiving role has negatively affected their career opportunities—a minority, but still a negative sign. Only 4% of women said their caregiving role positively affected their career opportunities.  

According to data from the Certified Financial Planner Board, female representation in the financial advisement sector has not improved very much despite industry pledges to improve it. In 2023, women made up just 23.7% of CFP professionals. That has not changed much over the years, with past figures at 23.6% in 2022, 23.4% in 2021 and 23.3% in 2020, according to the CFP Board website.

Through the years, Brown says WIPN has evolved from a place of connection and support to one leading change and development in the retirement industry writ large.

The new Allies in Action program, in her view, is an example of such evolution toward creating programs and activities that go beyond community and support toward actionable outcomes.

Brown says when preparing the women who joined the program, WIPN members coach them to be specific with their asks and focus areas with sponsors.

“A mentorship can be brainstorming together, but a sponsorship is a shorter relationship,” she says. “You have to be very direct and tell people what you are looking for, who you want to meet and how you want [the sponsor] to help you.”

Moving Forward

Allies in Action is designed to help women looking not just to move up in their current roles, but who might be considering moving from one side of the business to the other. Brown notes that, in retirement plan advisement in particular, women are sometimes in support roles, as opposed to being lead advisers or salespeople.

“Oftentimes it’s hard to move from one side of the business to the other,” she says. “Let’s say you’re on the service side, and you keep wanting to get over to the sales side, and [the employer] says, ‘Well, you don’t have the experience.’ But you see someone else who is able to move over to that side, and they don’t have that experience. It’s because someone on that side knew [the candidate] and recommended them.”

The program was not just of interest for people early in their careers. Brown notes one industry leader who was interested in participating, as she saw a chance to further her connections and career plans.

“When you see people at a higher point in their career, it’s often because they know how to take an opportunity and utilize it, and [they] understand the value of another sponsor,” she says.

Meanwhile, men in the program have committed to making introductions as related to the goals of their sponsored partner.

The sponsors “have to go through their Rolodex of people to find someone who is looking to develop more women or [is saying,] ‘I want someone on the sales side’ or ‘I’m looking for a consultant to do a certain type of work,’” she says. “It’s their challenge to make sure that the ladies they are working with—where they have the confidence to say, … ‘I know you’re looking to bring on another adviser. This person doesn’t have a book of business, but they have this amount of knowledge, and they would be great for your team.’”

Managing Fiduciary Conflicts in the Age of Convergence

ERISA expert David Kaleda discusses what the DOL’s proposed Retirement Security Rule may mean for retirement and wealth management firms.

In recent years, retirement plan advisers for Employee Retirement Security Act plans and advisers for wealth management clients have joined forces within the same firm. 

This convergence occurs by reason of two business lines within the same organization agreeing to work together, by reason of a merger or other business transaction designed to bring these two advisory practices together, or some other reason.  Among the many challenges involved with integrating these two practices is complying with the fiduciary and prohibited transactions of ERISA and section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code when providing advisory services to clients. 

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

David C. Kaleda

This will be even more so the case once the Department of Labor issues its final Advice Regulation later this year, particularly with regard to recommending rollovers or other types of distributions from a retirement plan.

A key advantage of combining the retirement plan advisory business and the wealth management business is the ability to provide full service financial services to the client.  For example, a wealthy small business owner can use a single firm to provide advice on how to establish and operate a retirement plan covering the owner and her employees, how participants in the plan should invest their assets in the retirement plan, and how the business owner should plan for her financial future outside of the retirement plan. 

In many cases, an adviser will find itself in a position where it must make a recommendation to the client business owner to take a full or partial distribution from the plan and rollover the proceeds to an IRA.  Or the adviser may recommend the client take a distribution from the plan or an IRA in order to purchase life insurance or something similar.   Oftentimes, the adviser will have a conflict of interest when she makes that recommendation, e.g., the amount of compensation the adviser or the firm receives changes.

Rollover Regulation

The pending advice regulation, under review by the White House Office of Management and Budget, is squarely aimed at the above-described rollover and distribution recommendations, as well as others. Under current law, the DOL says either a recommendation to take a distribution from a plan and roll it over to an IRA or a recommendation to transfer money from one IRA to another so the adviser can provide ongoing advice or management is the first step in an ongoing relationship that’s investment advice under the DOL’s 1975 regulation.  

However, the Advice Regulation will result in a substantial expansion of the situations in which the adviser provides investment advice.  Many more recommendations will be “investment advice” for purposes of ERISA or the Code.  For example, a single recommendation to take a plan distribution and use the assets to purchase term, whole, or universal life insurance, a product which is not otherwise subject to the jurisdiction of the DOL, would be investment advice. 

The fact that an advisory firm and its advisers may be fiduciaries in a broader set of circumstances may not be off-putting to some.  Indeed, they may already act as fiduciaries under the Investment Advisers Act.  However, the challenge for many firms will be adopting policies and procedures to address prohibited transactions, i.e., conflicts of interest, under ERISA and the Code.  The DOL will require most advisers to comply with Prohibited Transaction Exemption 2020-02 (PTE 2020-02), several modifications to which will be effective at the time DOL makes the Advice Regulation effective. 

Therefore, unlike under the Advisers Act, firms and their advisers must comply with substantial and specific conditions under PTE 2020-02 including an Impartial Conduct Standard, disclosures, policies and procedures, a retroactive compliance review, and specific requirements related to correcting violations of the exemption’s conditions.  These conditions likely go well beyond what a firm and its advisers do to comply with the Investment Advisers Act.

Future State

In conclusion, we should expect to see continued convergence of the retirement and wealth management industries.  We likely will not see a decline in this trend due to the actions of the DOL, or any other regulator for that matter.  However, some firms today and even more in the near future will have to spend a great deal of time and money revamping their compliance policies and procedures to assure compliance with ERISA and the Code, particularly PTE 2020-02. 

Such firms should also expect that over time the DOL will begin using its enforcement authority to investigate firms and their advisers to confirm that they properly identify the instances in which they act as fiduciaries for purposes of ERISA and the Code and that they are in full compliance with PTE 2020-02.

David C. Kaleda, principal, Groom Law Group, Chartered.

«