Female Advisers Lead the Push for Greater Diversity

They believe that the role of advisers has become more holistic, making the profession more appealing and accessible.
Art by Katherine Streeter

Art by Katherine Streeter


Attend any retirement plan advisory industry event and it is strikingly obvious that the profession is dominated by white men.

However, with the role of advisers shifting from investment selection to participants’ retirement readiness and holistic financial well-being, today’s female advisers believe the profession is evolving to appeal to more women. In addition, they also say that retirement planning practices are beginning to realize the importance of diversity and are beginning to actively recruit not only women but people from different ethnic and cultural backgrounds.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

“It is still a man’s world,” says Ellen Lander, principal of Renaissance Benefit Advisors of New York and the 2019 PLANSPONSOR Retirement Plan Adviser of the Year. “There are many organizations still out there in this day and age that are run by very strong-headed men that don’t regard women as their equal.”

Before founding her practice nine years ago, Lander worked in sales in the retirement division at MassMutual and was always the only women in the department. “I grew up in a man’s world,” she says. “However, there were challenges I faced a long time ago that I don’t face anymore.”

Perceived Barriers

What largely keeps women from entering the retirement planning industry is the fear that they have to be rainmakers, to cold call to create a book of business and that their sales numbers will be scrutinized, says Lynn Ballou, regional director at EP Wealth Advisors of Los Angeles.

The profession has changed, says Katherine Mauzy, principal of financial adviser talent acquisition at Edward Jones in St. Louis, Missouri. “Careers in retirement planning have evolved from being transactional to helping clients achieve life goals,” she says. Today’s retirement plan adviser has become a “holistic life planner who conducts complete wealth management discussions. Women aspire to build deeper, trusted relationships that clients really value. The skills today’s adviser needs includes empathy and understanding each client. That is appealing to a lot of women. We as an industry need to reach out to more women to educate them about this opportunity.”

While the role of the retirement plan adviser has become more holistic, Ballou agrees, many practices still value advisers who are sales-focused and who prioritize building out a book of business.

“Women care more about the relationship than the sales numbers,” she says. “That puts us at a disadvantage on the pay platform. Both add value, so firms need to create a way to create some parity.” And Ballou is optimistic this will happen.

“I think the most successful firms in the future will be those that value the loyal relationships that women can build,” she says. “There is no sense in having a business model where you are bringing in new clients but others are walking out the door because you didn’t take care of them. We need to value both—the rainmakers and the relationship-builders.”

As the role of retirement plan advisers has progressed, the skills needed for success have also progressed, says Joan Antoniello, a principal with Mazars USA Wealth Advisers in New York. “While the financial services and retirement planning industries have traditionally been male-dominated, driven by sales performance, that is starting to change,” Antoniello says. “Men are more focused on tangibles—numbers and performance, rather than the goals and objectives that women value.” The change in the profession has definitely benefited female advisers, she says.

In addition, retirement planning practices “have started to realize that with women controlling a third of the wealth in this country, there is a market to serve women, which is creating a tremendous opportunity for women as advisers right now,” Antoniello says. “This realization is changing the DNA of what an adviser had been in the past. Firms are starting to realize that diversity impacts the bottom line.”

Technology has also made it possible for women who are either raising children or taking care of elderly parents, or both, to be more flexible, Antoniello notes.

Attracting Women to the Profession

In order to attract women to the profession, it is important to provide them with mentors and the opportunity to network with and learn from other women in the business, Mauzy says.

EP Wealth Advisors has also created a financial literacy program conducted by its female advisers at high schools in various school districts with different ethnicities, says Erin Voisin, director of financial planning at the practice. “A big focus right now is diversity and inclusion in this industry,” she says.

The hope, Ballou adds, is that “rather than try to attract women to the profession as they make career moves later in life, we can recruit them at the early stages of their lives by showing them the importance of this profession and what a profound difference it can make in people’s lives.”

It is precisely this kind of personal outreach that has enabled Edward Jones to successfully recruit female retirement plan advisers to the point that they now comprise 20% of that workforce. The firm has asked advisers in its 277 regions around the country to actively recruit women to the business and then mentor and support them once they join the firm.

For the women who have joined Edward Jones as retirement planning advisers, the firm holds “Women Helping Other Women” events around the country, where these advisers can share ideas and learn from panel discussions where top women advisers share their thoughts on best practices. Last year, Edward Jones held 55 such events and added a recruitment dinner the night before.

And for the past two years, Edward Jones has invited women advisers from competitors to attend its seminars, with 40% to 50% of these women then deciding to join Edward Jones, Mauzy says.

For the retirement planning profession to become more diverse, to include women and people of various ethnicities, will take time, Ballou predicts. “The change will be multigenerational,” she says.

At Edward Jones, “we are very optimistic that there is a bright future for diversity,” Mauzy says. “It will take time, discipline and consistency, but I know we are up for the challenge.”

Your Clients’ Cybersecurity Concerns

Retirement plan advisers can help plan sponsor clients know their providers are taking the right steps to protect participant data—without exposing information hackers can find.

Art by Lily Padula


As more cybersecurity attacks are reported about in the media, it is an issue at the top of many minds in the retirement industry.

In 2018, the ERISA Advisory Council asked the Department of Labor (DOL) to provide guidance on how plan sponsors should evaluate the cybersecurity risks they face and to require them to be familiar with the various security frameworks used to protect data, as well as to build a cybersecurity process. Earlier this year, lawmakers sent a letter to the Government Accountability Office (GAO) asking it to examine cybersecurity in the U.S. retirement system. The letter identifies 10 questions the lawmakers would like the GAO to answer, following its examination.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

Even as the issue evolves, there are some practical steps retirement plan providers are taking to relieve retirement plan sponsors’ worries about the risk of cybersecurity threats to participant accounts. According to Wendy Carter, vice president and defined contribution director in Segal’s Washington, D.C. office, and a vice-chair of the Data Security Oversight Board for The SPARK Institute, all companies have insurance to make participants whole if their account balances are accessed and taken.

Allison Itami, principal with Groom Law Group in Washington, D.C., and co-author of a white paper issued by the Pension Research Council and The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, says cybersecurity insurance is an evolving area—a growth opportunity for insurers. Plan sponsors’ errors and omissions (E&O) insurance provider may have it, but they may need to find a specialist broker to help find it.

Plan advisers can help in this area as well. But, mainly advisers help plan sponsors with cybersecurity concerns by including questions about cybersecurity practices in requests for proposals (RFPs) issued to providers. However, Carter notes, providers are concerned about providing information about their cybersecurity practices, and that their efforts would be for naught because hackers could get access to the information they reveal.

Framework to help evaluate cybersecurity processes of providers

These concerns are why The SPARK Institute came up with a framework for cybersecurity disclosure by plan providers. It includes 16 identified critical data security control objectives, and requires plan providers to use an independent third-party auditor. According to the white paper co-authored by Itami, each audited report, regardless of the security framework used, must include a detailed report showing identified controls mapped to one of SPARK’s 16 control objectives.

Those 16 control objectives are:

  • Risk assessment and treatment;
  • Security policy;
  • Organizational security;
  • Asset management;
  • Human resource security;
  • Physical and environmental security;
  • Communications and operations management;
  • Access control;
  • Information systems acquisition development;
  • Incident and communications management;
  • Business resiliency;
  • Compliance;
  • Mobile;
  • Encryption;
  • Supplier risk; and
  • Cloud security.

Itami explains that the framework is trying to reach the goal of providing a format for plan sponsors to look at different providers and compare apples to apples. “A plan sponsor can take the approach of asking the 16 questions, but that is not efficient, and they might run into resistance about giving detailed information that could be used by hackers,” she says.

With the SPARK framework, an outside auditor will write a report analyzing how recordkeepers address the 16 controls. “They will lay out a provider’s process without going into details. For example, the report may say, Provider A uses X encryption,” Itami says.

She adds that the report shows a provider has something in place and whether it looks rigorous or not.

Carter says the auditor’s report will also identify whether any issues have come up with a provider, whether it was a significant risk and whether it has been corrected.

At the time the framework was being developed, Mike Volo, senior partner at Cammack Retirement Group in Wellesley, Massachusetts, and a participant on SPARK’s Data Security Oversight Board, said, “We are experts in retirement plans and investments, not in data security. I think with this Common Certification Criteria, as we do RFP searches, having the certification will be a requirement. It will streamline our RFP process.”

Itami says in RFPs, advisers can ask prospective providers whether they have had an independent audit of cyber controls and to see the report. If they don’t have one, the adviser can ask for one.

When an adviser is asked about cybersecurity controls

Segal has an investment advisory business and, according to Carter, most of what it sees in RFPs regarding cybersecurity is a request for its data intake and management protocols.

While the SPARK solution is for recordkeepers, advisers concerned about revealing confidential business practices may consider a similar audit report to provide plan sponsors.

Carter adds that as part of its cybersecurity best practices, Segal’s investment advisory business doesn’t maintain any participant information.

A post from Joseph J. Lazzarotti, a principal at law firm Jackson Lewis, says B.C. Pension Corporation announced a data breach involving pension plan records after discovering a box containing microfiche could not be found following a recent office move. The box contained personal information (names, Social Security numbers and dates of birth) on approximately 8,000 pension plan participants. The company employed those participants during the period 1982 to 1997.

He noted that ERISA includes specific record retention requirements, but he cited a 2016 ERISA Advisory Council report of considerations for the DOL, which said plan sponsors and service providers should:

  • Retain only the data that is needed; if certain data elements can be redacted, remove them;
  • Maintain an inventory of records that are retained regardless of format, and where to find them;
  • Outline a clear process for moving records, and track location and inventory during the move; and
  • Delete records that are no longer needed; confirm service providers have done so, as applicable.

«