Demographics a Factor in Retirement Income Sources

Gender, marital status, age, education, and other demographic variables have a significant impact on the likelihood of a worker receiving a retirement annuity and/or employment-based pension income in retirement, suggests a report by the Employee Benefit Research Institute (EBRI).

There is also a strong correlation between these same variables and the amount of pension income received from private and/or public-sector employment-based retirement plans, according to the May 2010 EBRI Notes.  

Gender  

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

In 2008, 43.2% of men age 65 and over received annuity and/or pension income, with a mean amount of $19,557 per year. Only 29.4% of women age 65 and over received annuity and/or pension income that year, with mean pension income of $12,137. Hence, a woman age 65 and over in 2008 was only two-thirds (68.1%) as likely to receive an annuity and/or pension payment as her male counterpart, and if she did receive one, her mean benefit was likely to be 62.1% of that received by a man in the same age group. 

EBRI said this finding can be explained by the fact that women age 50 and over in 2008 spent fewer years in the labor force than younger cohorts, generally because of caregiving duties. Because of relatively lower labor force participation rates, women in the older age group are more likely to receive pension income through their husbands, as spouses or survivors, than through their own savings or employment.  

Widows were the largest proportion of women age 50 and over receiving annuities and/or pensions in 2008, at 33.1%. Widows received the lowest mean and median retirement annuity and/or pension income amounts among women of any marital status – $11,794 in 2008 compared with $18,714 for women who were never married.

Other Demographics Affecting Retirement Income Sources 

In 2008, 27.7% of men age 50 and older with a graduate-level education received an annuity and/or pension income, compared with 19.3% of men without a high school diploma, according to the May EBRI Notes. In 2008, men with graduate-level degrees received 4.2 times the median annuity and/or pension income that was received by men without a high school diploma.

The data also indicates the likelihood of receiving an annuity and/or pension income increases with age, until the oldest age group (those age 80 and over), where a lower percentage receives annuity and/or pension income. However, since 1975, the percentage of individuals age 80 and over receiving annuity and/or pension income has been increasing, from 17.7% in 1975 to 37.3% in 2008.

While fewer individuals age 50 and over received pension income from a public-sector plan (7.7%) than from a private-sector plan (12.2%) in 2008, the average amount an individual received from a public-sector plan ($24,147) was considerably larger than that received by a private-sector plan recipient ($13,222). 

EBRI said current trends indicate future retirees may not have a steady income stream in retirement. Fewer employees are participating in a DB plan, which, in the past, almost always paid benefits in the form of an annuity upon retirement, and in today’s workplace, an increasing number of DB plans are offering a lump-sum distribution option at retirement. In addition, DC plans are far less likely to offer an annuity option to retirees than are DB plans. 

The findings are based on an EBRI analysis of the Census Bureau’s 2009 Current Population Survey. 

The May issue of EBRI Notes is here.

 

LTCI Marketing System for Advisers Introduced

Corporate Compensation Plans, Inc. (CCP) and Harley Gordon, an attorney and authority on long-term care financing, have introduced the CLTC-WealthSecure System, a long-term care insurance marketing systems for financial advisers and insurance professionals.

According to CCP and Gordon, the marketing program does not require any detailed knowledge of long term care insurance and it enables advisers and insurance professionals to answer these critical questions regarding their wealthier clients:

  • Why is it absolutely essential to engage our clients in a discussion about extended health care – and how do we open that discussion?
  • How do we enable our clients to objectively determine if extended health care represents a serious threat to their financial and estate plans?
  • How do we quantify and compare self-insuring the extended health care risk with a tax-advantaged long term care insurance transaction?
  • How can we use long term care insurance to reduce estate tax liabilities and transfer wealth on a tax-advantaged basis?

Features of the new CLTC-WealthSecure System include:

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

  • A concise step-by-step program that gives advisers and insurance professionals the confidence to address the subject of long term health care with clients and their advisers.
  • An easy to master system that measures the client’s exposure to long term health care costs through the use of a dynamic Flash presentation that instantaneously quantifies and compares self-insurance with insurance funding options. It also calculates the tax impact of liquidating qualified and nonqualified retirement plan assets and investment accounts to pay the costs of extended health care.
  • A detailed projection of premiums, tax deductions, tax credits, and premium refunds that converts a long term care insurance policy into a tax-advantaged financial transaction.

According to a press release, the CLTC-WealthSecure System will be available on a licensing basis in the near future. In addition, a special model will be available for large insurance agencies and field marketing organizations that will allow them to maximize the long term care insurance potential of both their full-time and brokerage agents.

«