Kieran Stover joined the firm as vice president for sales
and business development from Kleinwort Benson Investors International Ltd.,
where he was senior vice president of business development. Stover has also
worked as director of business development at Arnerich Massena in Portland,
Oregon, which remains his base of operations.
In his new role, Stover takes on responsibility for sales
and business development covering consultants and plan sponsors in the western United
States.
Michael Annis joined Baring Asset Management as head of
sales and business development, Canada. He will be based in Toronto, Canada.
Before joining Bearing, Annis served as a consultant and adviser for J.P.
Morgan Asset Management (Canada) Inc. He previously held positions at
AllianceBernstein Canada and Royal Bank of Canada Dominion Securities Inc.
Annis is now responsible for business development and client
services across Canada and parts of the United States.
Almost
half of investors say they need investment advice, want an adviser they can trust
and do not understand how the compensation works, according to Cerulli
Associates.
A recent Cerulli report, “U.S. Retail Investor Advice
Relationships 2013: Sorting Out the Winners and Losers,” examines the relationship
between financial advisers and retail investors. From client acquisition and advice delivery to investment management, pricing, and client
retention strategies, Cerulli takes a deep dive into the importance of advice. The report breaks down primary
and secondary relationships, investor concerns, investor preferences for adviser
compensation, and the strategies advisers can use to address and capture retail
investor assets.
Obviously investment performance
is a factor investors consider, Cerulli says, but in strong markets, investors do not
distinguish the difference between returns of, say, 25% and 26%. In these cases, advisory firms
must consider other metrics to differentiate their firms from the competition.
During the most recent market
downturn, for example, investors felt betrayed by providers and advisers who
failed to protect them on the downside, the report points out. This led to many
investors seeking out other providers for advice and expanding the number of
relationships with financial providers.
Cerulli strongly suggests that
firms rethink the effectiveness of positioning themselves using the hallmark of investment performance.
Most important to investors is finding an adviser they trust who will work with them to
attain their financial goals, Cerulli finds. To strengthen client relationships,
advisers need to be more straightforward about the products they place in a portfolio.
Advisers need to explain how and why products make sense for a given situation,
and use a thorough financial planning process to identify the solutions most
appropriate for a client’s needs.
Trusted advisers walk their
clients through all performance outcomes and what those can mean to a client’s
long-term goals, the report contends. Investors want advisers who not only know
their needs and goals, but who truly understand what those goals mean to the client.
Some of the factors investors
were asked to rate as extremely important in choosing an adviser are:
Taking time to understand needs
and goals (46%);
Explaining analysis clearly
(43%);
Keeping an eye on portfolio, alerting
clients to problems and opportunities (41%);
Looking at entire financial
picture (39%);
Performance of investments
relative to the overall market (37%);
Providing a comprehensive
review on a periodic basis (36%); and
Keeps clients informed of
current market conditions (31%).
CompensationConfusion
More than half of investors
(60%) can’t understand the compensation structures their providers use, the
report finds. This is despite the fact that more firms have increased efforts to
highlight fee structures, particularly fee-based advisers.
The report admits that investor
lack of understanding can stem from inattention. But, Cerulli contends,
financial services firms must acknowledge that when such a vast number of
clients are unable to understand how and what they pay, the financial services
industry itself is to blame.
As more firms transition to
fee-based relationships, the report says, the industry will have an uphill
climb as the lines between transaction business and fee-only business blur. Even
when firms choose to disclose their fee and commission structures during onboarding,
it quickly becomes an afterthought, not often revisited by clients until it is too late.
With only a 62% satisfaction
rate with their providers, the data clearly supports the notion that investors
who are not sure what they pay become the least-satisfied clients, the report
finds. Also contributing to this system-wide shortfall in understanding compensation is the fact that most investors believe their adviser is acting in their best interest.
Indeed, as long as advisers are
truly acting as a fiduciary, fee confusion may not be as important. However,
many are still not yet legally obligated to act as a fiduciary. Firms that are
clear and upfront about what fee their clients are paying ultimately will have
better relationships.
“One of the challenges facing
the advisory industry is simply helping potential clients understand the value
an adviser can provide,” says Roger Stamper, senior analyst at Cerulli. “The
good news for advisers is that investors are expressing increased interest in
seeking advice regarding their portfolios. Overall, 37% of our survey
respondents indicate an increased need for investment advice.”
More information about “U.S.
Retail Investor Advice Relationships 2013: Sorting Out the Winners and Losers,”
including how to purchase a copy of the report, is available on Cerulli’s
website.