Airlines with the Worst Delays

If you are on one of these flights, you can probably count on it being late.

For instance, if you are flying on US Airways from Charlotte, North Carolina, to Honolulu, Hawaii—the most frequently delayed flight last year—be sure to bring a book. US Airways flight 807 was late 100% of the time in 2009, according to a study by the Bureau of Transportation Statistics.

The other flights rounding out the top five most delayed flights in 2009 were:

2. AirTran Airways flight 608 from Milwaukee to Baltimore/Washington International Airport (late 93.33% of the time)
2. ExpressJet Airlines flight 2412 from Minneapolis/St. Paul to Newark, New Jersey (late 93.33% of the time)
4. Frontier Airlines flight 752 from Los Angeles to Milwaukee (late 90.32% of the time)
5. Comair flight 6700 from New York JFK to Houston George Bush (late 87.50% of the time)
5. Hawaiian Airlines flight 5 from Las Vegas to Honolulu (late 87.50% of the time).

The top three airlines with the best on-time arrival rates were: Hawaiian Airlines (87%), Alaska Airlines (84%), and United Airlines (77.3%).

The worst three were: American Eagle Airlines (64.5%), Comair (65.9%), and AirTran Airways (66.4%).

Overall, the nation’s largest airlines did better this year than last year. The 19 carriers analyzed in the study had an on-time performance rate in 2009 of 79.5%, which was slightly higher than 2008’s 76% and the best since the 82% on-time rate in 2003.

In addition, the rate of mishandled baggage was at the lowest recorded since 2004. Last year the carriers mishandled about 3.91 of every 1,000 passengers, an improvement over 2008’s 5.26. However, that still doesn’t bring airlines back to the 2002 level of 3.84.

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

Perspective: Are Small-Business Owner Clients Struggling to Retain Talent?

Offering a strong retirement package can be the key to success.

The first in a series of articles about working with small-business retirement plans.

Small-business owners face multiple challenges—from making payroll to attracting and retaining the best possible talent. Today’s economic environment has compounded the challenge small-business owners have faced for many years—how to offer a competitive benefits package that includes a retirement plan for dedicated employees. With hopes of an economic recovery on the horizon and an increase in the demand for talent, it could eventually become a buyer’s market again for employees. In this scenario, small-business employees may start looking elsewhere for a strong benefits package to ensure their healthcare and retirement planning needs are being met. For financial advisers committed to the retirement plan business, this provides a unique opportunity for growth—despite the ever-changing market conditions.

There are many factors that go into developing a comprehensive retirement plan. The first step is understanding the needs of the small-business owner. Is a sole-proprietor looking to maximize his or her retirement savings? Is it a family-owned business with multiple highly-compensated employees? Would the small-business owner like to contribute to their own retirement savings while offering a plan for their employees? 

Once a needs analysis is complete, the next step is educating your prospective clients about the benefits of offering a retirement plan, the types of plan designs, and how plans can help retain key employees while also supporting the client’s business goals. Retirement-centric financial advisers understand the challenges many business owners face and strive to present them with cost-efficient options.

Several common objections small-business owners have to offering a retirement plan revolve around the cost of the plan. However, there are solutions to help mitigate these concerns: 

Common Objections
Solution
Revenue is too uncertain or low
Many retirement plan solutions offer competitive pricing as well as tax benefits from the federal government for initiating a plan, such as a $500 per year tax credit spanning three years to cover eligible administrative costs.
Administrative costs 
Integrating a small-business owner’s payroll and retirement plan allows the owner to devote resources to running their business.
Low employee interest
Implement an employee education program that can raise awareness and drive participation.
Match on employee contributions
Employer matching employee contributions, along with most plan fees, are tax deductible. (Subject to certain Internal Revenue Code limitations.)

 

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

Some of the most commonly utilized plan types are: 

1. 401(k): Many small-business owners ignore this option, but they are allowed to set up a 401(k) when self-employed. The 401(k) plan may be funded by the owner through deferred compensation and the business as a percentage of profit. There usually is more paperwork required than for other plan types, and set-up costs are usually a bit higher. The 401(k) plan will likely need a third-party administrator (TPA).

2. SIMPLE IRA: This plan type is very easy to create, typically has very low administrative costs and comes with no annual IRS reporting requirements.

3. New Comparability Plans: These plans are essentially profit-sharing plans set up to provide increased rewards to senior and other key employees.  The most appropriate use of this type of plan is when a small business has multiple owners with similar incomes but varying ages.  Keep in mind, though, this plan type does require nondiscrimination testing requirements be met.

    It’s also critical to keep yourself, and your small-business owner clients, abreast of legislative and regulatory changes as well as the innovations in retirement plan design.

    The next column in this series, online next month, will explore the mechanics of maintaining strong small-business retirement plans.


    John Guido is the Division Vice President, Marketing for ADP Retirement Service. In this capacity, John is responsible for oversight of ADP’s product and strategic initiatives in the retirement space. Prior to joining ADP, John held senior level marketing and sales roles at Metlife and Standard and Poor’s.

    ADP Broker-Dealer, Inc., ADP, Inc. and their affiliates do not offer investment, tax or legal advice, and nothing in this article is intended to be, nor should be construed as, advice or a recommendation for a particular situation.  Please have your clients consult with their own adviser for such advice.

    «

    Welcome to ExchangeMonitor!

     Get the latest news, industry trends and business intelligence on the Department of Energy's nuclear weapons complex