A Third of Large Employers Restoring 401(k) Match

A recent Watson Wyatt survey of large employers found that 35% of those that reduced their 401(k) match anticipate reversing that decision in the next six months—up from 24% in August and 5% in June.

A Watson Wyatt news release said 25% of respondents have cut their match, while 56% put in a salary and hiring freeze.

For companies expecting to reinstate their 401(k) or 403(b) match, 70% will change it back to the original level, 13% will reinstate the match at a lower level, and 17% will vary it by year, based on company profits.

According to the survey, more than half (54%) of employers that froze salaries plan to unfreeze them within the next six months, a sharp increase from 33% in August and 17% in June. Almost half (49%) also plan to reverse hiring freezes at least partially in the next six months, compared to 38% two months ago.

“The general economic picture right now is definitely brighter than it was just a few months ago,” said Laura Sejen, global director of strategic rewards consulting at Watson Wyatt. “However, the recovery is uneven and most employers aren’t fully convinced that the improvements they’ve seen are here to stay. While many plan to hire workers over the next few months, they remain concerned about their ability to attract and retain the right people.”

Almost all responding large employers (96%) have made offers to new hires in the past three months, and the vast majority (93%) anticipates making offers in the next three months. However, approximately one-fifth still anticipates making layoffs in the remainder of 2009 or in 2010.

Looking ahead three to five years, 50% of respondents expect an increase in difficulty in attracting critical-skill employees, and 55% expect an increase in difficulty in retaining critical-skill employees. In light of the recession, 44% of employers have encouraged managers to make greater use of recognition plans.

For companies expecting to make offers to new hires, 83% will do so for professional, non-managerial staff, followed by 71% for director, manager or middle management positions. Only 47% will be hiring for senior management or executive level positions.

The newest survey was conducted in October 2009 and includes responses from 201 large employers. More study is available here.

Travelers Biggest Pet Peeves

Poor hygiene, oversized carry-on luggage, and bickering families are among the top travel annoyances for Americans.

Travelocity asked approximately 1,000 U.S. travelers about the bad travel behaviors that irk them the most. It seems many Americans don’t mind plane conversation: Chatty passengers only received 5% of the vote for most disliked passengers. Actually, the least-favorite people to sit next to on a plane are passengers with poor hygiene (44%), coughing or sneezing passengers (31%), and large passengers (15%).

More than 80% of respondents think large passengers should be in two seats. However, many (40%) don’t think the large passenger should have to pay for the extra seat.

What’s the most irritating on-board behavior? For more than half (56%) of respondents, loud talking or swearing is the worst, followed by kicking the seat (50%). The most annoying travelers to encounter are arguing families (31%), boisterous kids (28%), and rowdy college students (24%), according to Travelocity’s poll.

When boarding a plane, the guy with the overstuffed suitcase as a carry-on tops the list of irritations (29% of respondents agreed), followed by passengers that block the aisle (22%). When de-boarding the plane, passengers who rush to get off the plane before those ahead of them are the most annoying (59% agreed).

Noisy children are a classic complaint when traveling, but people traveling without children are twice as likely to be bothered by them as those traveling with children (30% verse 15%). When encountering misbehaving children, most people just ignore it (44%) or avoid them (23%).

The full results of the 2009 Rudeness Poll are available here.

«