Richard Sippola, the fiduciary of the Cleveland-based Carnegie
Body Company 401(k) Retirement Plan, has agreed to restore losses to the
participants in the amount of $9,396.03, the full amount of unremitted
contributions and loan repayments for the March 13, 2009 to January 10, 2010,
in quarterly installments beginning on April 1, 2014.
The DOL had filed a lawsuit, Perez v. Sippola, et al., with
the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division.
The suit named Sippola as a defendant, both individually and as fiduciary of
the 401(k) plan. Recently, the court issued a consent order and judgment, detailing
Sippola’s repayment efforts.
The suit alleged that Sippola failed to ensure that
employee pre-tax contributions and loan repayments for the period of March 13,
2009 to January 10, 2010, were remitted to the Carnegie Body Company 401(k)
Retirement Plan.
The full text of consent order and judgment can
be downloaded here.
By using this site you agree to our network wide Privacy Policy.
Aggregated qualified retirement plan audit data from the Department of Labor (DOL) shows that, of the 3,677 investigations closed in 2013, violations were found nearly 73% of the time.
Beyond plan violations, DOL investigators closed some 320
criminal investigations in 2013, with 88 indictments and 70 guilty pleas or
convictions. Taken together, plan sponsors paid a collective $1.7 billion in
plan reimbursements and fines to settle the criminal cases and violations last
year alone.
Bruce Ashton, an attorney with tDrinker
Biddle & Reath LLP, says those numbers contain a clear message for plan
fiduciaries and financial advisers working with retirement plans: the best way
to survive an audit unscathed is to avoid it in the first place.
“In my time as a practicing attorney, I’ve rarely if ever
been able to help a client avoid a plan audit once they’ve been identified as a
possible audit target by the DOL,” Ashton explains. “So clearly the best advice
I can give to my clients is to proactively ensure their plans are compliant,
and that they are avoiding the triggers used by the DOL to identify potential
audit targets.”
Ashton, along with a panel of other legal and audit experts on the second day of the 2014 NAPA 401(k) Summit, hosted by the National Association of Plan Advisers (NAPA) in New Orleans, shared best practices for avoiding and surviving plan audits.
The DOL and Internal Revenue Service (IRS) rely on a number of triggers to efficiently direct investigation efforts, he says. Perhaps the strongest is a participant
complaint filed directly with the DOL or IRS, Ashton says, which tends to
happen when plan fiduciaries consistently ignore participant questions or concerns. Advisers should ensure their sponsors
have a robust communications system in place to field and address participant
anxieties—and any complaints that arise should be taken seriously, Ashton suggests. Again, the
key is to find a solution before a complaint is filed or an audit is launched.
Other
common triggers include both minor and significant mistakes on required annual
plan disclosures, especially Form 5500. In the eyes of
government auditors, a small mistake on critical documentation could signal
more substantial issues with plan governance efforts, Ashton notes.
Janet Nahorney, a certified public accountant and partner at
the accounting firm BlumShapiro, explains that another trigger used by the
DOL and the IRS doesn’t involve actual mistakes. If a plan is working with an
auditing firm that only dabbles in the retirement plan space to complete its
required annual testing, that can signal to federal regulators that the plan
may not be receiving adequate oversight and therefore deserves a closer look.
“Over the years, a majority of reputable accounting firms
that do benefit plan audits have joined the Employee Benefit Plan Audit
Quality Center, so that’s an important thing to note,” Nahorney says. “My
advice is to make sure those who are reviewing your plan regularly are
registered with the center. That will be viewed favorably by the DOL.”
Other common audit triggers include negative news stories,
either directly related to the retirement plan or a company’s general
management practices, Nahorney says. The DOL also takes note of bankruptcy
filings and how they may impact plan participants, she says.
Once an audit is triggered, say Ashton and Nahorney, plan
fiduciaries should cooperate fully with the DOL and provide whatever
information is requested. The deadline for returning requested plan data is
typically 10 days, Ashton says.
Ashton suggest that plan fiduciaries should be sure to
return requested information to the DOL in a timely fashion, but it’s important
to have enough time to completely review what’s required and what violations,
if any, may arise from the disclosures. That usually means a plan will have to
file for a reasonable extension, such as an extra two or three weeks, which the
DOL almost always grants, Ashton says.
Nahorney says it’s critical to be upfront about any
violations, potential or actual, contained in the disclosures—as the DOL will
find them, and the federal regulators take a far more favorable view of plan
fiduciaries that are honest about mistakes or compliance issues that exist in
their plan. This can also improve the likelihood that compliance issues will be
viewed as mistakes, rather than willful violations.
“We
get questions from sponsors and service providers who ask, ‘Why should I point
out my mistakes? Let the DOL find them,’ ” Ashton says. “Well, they will find
them—it’s better to be proactive.”
Ashton suggests plan fiduciaries make full use of the
time between when an audit is triggered and when DOL or IRS investigators
arrive (or conduct phone reviews). If the fiduciaries can put fixes in place
before the auditors even identify specific problems, that may not absolve the
fiduciaries of all liability, but it will go a long way toward satisfying the
auditors and improving outcomes.
Of course, while it’s absolutely essential to give the DOL
the information it requests, Ashton points out that there is no need to supply information that is not specifically requested by the DOL. So
it’s important to keep close track of what is being turned over to the DOL, and for
what purposes.
Once all the required information is submitted, Nahorney
says, it becomes a game of hurry up and wait.
“I’ve seen audits that have lasted for
years,” she says, pointing to an extreme example that took more than five
years to close. “At the end, you’ll either be cleared or, if there are
problems, you’ll need an attorney to negotiate a reasonable outcome with the
regulators.”
Ashton is quick to point out that sponsors and fiduciary
advisers should not roll over and play dead when a violation is found and
penalties or plan reimbursements are sought by the DOL or IRS.
“Sometimes
the DOL investigators do make mistakes,” Ashton says. “Don’t just enter a
‘settlement,’ because there are extra penalties involved with a settlement.
Very often we send a letter back that says we disagree wholeheartedly with your
conclusion, but nevertheless we put $5,000 back into the plan voluntarily, or
whatever amount the DOL is pursuing. We make it clear that we’re not settling
with the DOL and triggering additional penalties. Be very careful about not
settling.”