Wirehouse Advisers Less Satisfied Than Others

In a J.D. Power survey, independent advisory firms were more likely to have a higher satisfaction score than employee groups. 

As the United States prepares for a post-pandemic world, some financial advisers say they are still feeling a lack of support from their employers, even as the current financial markets boosted satisfaction for others.

The “J.D. Power 2021 U.S. Financial Advisor Satisfaction Study” said wirehouse advisers are reporting several problems with their firms. Wirehouse advisers said they experienced significantly lower levels of support from their firm, along with a greater disruption of business services and more difficulty transitioning to remote work, than advisers employed by non-wirehouse and independent advisory firms. The study is based on responses from more than 3,000 employee and independent financial advisers.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

While independent advisers are affiliated with a broker/dealer (B/D) but operate individually, employee advisers work for an investment services firm.

According to the report, wirehouse firms are falling short of adviser expectations, with 34% of employee advisers reporting reduced levels of support from the home office and 29% saying they’ve experienced a disruption of business services. These advisers also cited higher levels of difficulty when transitioning to remote work than other advisers, according to J.D. Power.

Dissatisfied advisers said they were more than three times as likely to switch firms than advisers who were satisfied with their jobs. When tracking firm-level adviser satisfaction scores from 2018 through 2021, J.D. Power found 18% of advisers who worked for firms with the lowest adviser satisfaction scores ended up switching firms during that period.

“Adviser satisfaction is directly linked to retention and brand advocacy, so firms that want to get the most out of their advisers need to invest in providing them with the best tools and support to do their jobs effectively under all circumstances,” says Mike Foy, senior director of wealth and lending intelligence at J.D. Power. “This year has been especially challenging, and this study identifies some firms that clearly did a better job than others in meeting those challenges.”

As part of the study, advisers also ranked employee and independent advisory groups based on compensation, leadership and culture, operational support, products and marketing, professional development, and technology.

Edward Jones ranked first in overall adviser satisfaction in the employee adviser group, with a score of 890 on a 1,000-point scale. Following Edward Jones were Raymond James & Associates at 864, Stifel at 857, Ameriprise at 789, Morgan Stanley at 757, Merrill Lynch at 698, UBS at 627 and Wells Fargo Advisors at 577.

Independent firms received higher scores overall than employee-based adviser firms, with the highest ranking at 936 for Commonwealth. Raymond James Financial Services scored at 853 in its ranking, and Cambridge received a ranking of 842. Other firms reviewed include Northwestern Mutual (828), Ameriprise (827), LPL Financial (817), Cetera (777) and Advisor Group (710).

More information on the study can be found here.

Investment Product and Service Launches

MFS makes changes to CIT line and Diligend and eVestment partner on data exchange platform.

Art by Jackson Epstein

Art by Jackson Epstein

MFS Makes Changes to CIT Line

MFS is making a series of enhancements to its collective investment trust (CIT) line. The enhancements include changes to the unit class structure, lower investment minimums and reductions in management fees or expense caps on several CIT funds. The firm is also adding increased pricing flexibility for mandates over $200 million.

“We believe these enhancements further align MFS with the needs of retirement plan fiduciaries and participants and ensure the firm’s long‐term competitiveness in the U.S. retirement marketplace,” says Sean Kenney, managing director for defined contribution (DC) at MFS. “The defined contribution market grows in complexity year over year, and a robust CIT ecosystem is driving CIT adoption by plan sponsors of all sizes with diverse requirements. We are pleased to be able to offer the enhancements to address plan fiduciaries’ and participants’ evolving needs.”

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

Highlights of the enhancements include the following:

  • MFS now has Class 2, Class 3 and Class 4 unit‐class offerings, with investment minimums of $0, $50 million and $100 million, respectively;
  • The firm will create dedicated unit classes for mandates above $200 million and certain sub-advised and outsourced chief investment officer (OCIO) opportunities; and
  • MFS is dropping the expense cap from 10 basis points (bps) to 5 bps on four international equity CITs and its Global Aggregate Opportunistic CIT.

“The new unit class structure provides the flexibility required to align with larger, more complex plan sponsor mandates, especially those driven by sub-advisory and OCIOs, while providing a compelling value proposition to small and mid‐size plans,” Kenney adds.

Diligend and eVestment Partner on Data Exchange Platform

Diligend, a cloud-based due diligence software provider built for asset allocators, and eVestment, a Nasdaq company that focuses on institutional investment data and analytics, have announced an agreement under which eVestment data will be available through the Diligend platform.

Diligend offers a data exchange platform that automates the tasks and data requests institutional investors and consultants frequently make of asset managers. The platform enables one-to-one, periodic and ad-hoc data collection efforts, which can be difficult to manage as the information is often tied to individual, static documents. Diligend’s tools transform this process by providing a fully custom, digitized and automated due diligence questionnaire tool combined with a full featured workflow and analytics platform. The platform makes requesting data, distributing data requests and initiating follow-up reminders easy to manage, while also automatically flagging answers, tracking changes and aggregating data for benchmarking.

The firms say this agreement will allow clients of both eVestment and Diligend to complete more of their due diligence process via one technology platform. The data and technology tools that will facilitate this data-sharing and due diligence effort between eVestment and Diligend are set to launch in the coming months.

“Collecting and analyzing manager data and documents can be challenging and cumbersome for investors,” says Wissem Souissi, Diligend founder and CEO. “The difficulty in managing the questionnaire distribution process and performing sufficient ongoing due diligence with limited resources limits the level of oversight and increases the operational risk for investors. Diligend solves this through data centralization and process automation. By aligning with eVestment, we’ve made the entire due diligence process more efficient and scalable.”

“Eliminating unnecessary work, risk and complexity in the due diligence process provides opportunities for better engagement between investors and asset managers and, ultimately, better results for the work both are doing,” says eVestment Head of Strategic Partnerships Lisa Terwilliger. “We are excited to add Diligend to our network of technology providers for our joint clients.”

«