Using ACA as Bridge to Retirement Health Coverage

Experts suggest the Affordable Care Act offers options for those seeking early retirement but needing, for obvious reasons, to maintain affordable medical coverage traditionally only found in the workplace.  

For Americans who are interested in retiring but continue to work full-time to bridge their medical benefits to Medicare, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) offers new health insurance options, says Prudential Financial in a new white paper.

By taking advantage of the health insurance options made available through the ACA, individuals can enhance career flexibility later in life, Prudential says, “without having to worry about their health insurance in the same way as prior generations of early retirees.” There are some deep-seated and opposing opinions about what the ACA is doing to the American health care system, but Prudential says those who have left full-time jobs and are under age 65 might have the most to gain.

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

This is because generally Americans only become eligible for Medicare at age 65, which, according to Rodney Allain, head of sales and distribution for Prudential Annuities, leaves many people staying in a job “longer than they’d like just to keep the health insurance.” It may seem like an extreme choice to work longer than theoretically necessary to maintain health coverage, but given the potentially catastrophic financial impact of an uncovered-but-serious health event (think cancer or a car accident), for even affluent people, the strategy makes economic sense.

Under the ACA’s plethora of new insurance options and approaches, however, Prudential says individuals may now be able to retire early, work part-time or move on to a new career—still knowing there are more affordable healthcare coverage options available than just a few years ago. 

Allain notes the primary reason people are in search for a bridge to Medicare is the changing retirement picture in the United States. He says most Americans are now retiring in stages, rather than abruptly at the age of 65 or 66, moving into part-time jobs or becoming selfemployed. The factors contributing to this trend include a lack of retirement savings, freezing and shuttering of defined benefit plans, and increasing health care costs.

NEXT: Encouraging trends 

“The guidelines in the ACA include a number of provisions aimed at making health insurance more accessible and affordable,” says Jim Mahaney, vice president of strategic initiatives for Prudential. “There’s no need to worry any longer over dangerous gaps in coverage or being turned down for coverage due to a pre-existing condition.”

Mahaney feels early retirees can also benefit from provisions that “limit the amount older individuals can be charged and prohibit insurers from charging women more than men.” The ACA also provides subsidies and tax credits for lower income individuals, he says, which could prove particularly valuable for early retirees. This group may have less taxable income than when they were employed in a full-time job, he explains, and can often control the amount of taxable income they take during the years just prior to turning 65 and becoming Medicare eligible.

Prudential finds people seem to be getting used to the idea of purchasing coverage through public and/or private health insurance exchanges, often known as marketplaces. They’re also increasingly willing to get and seek information directly from health insurance companies, from an agent or broker, or from an online seller.

The whitepaper continues: “The cost [of coverage for a given pre-retiree] will depend on the type of plan, with each plan designed to pay, on average, a range between 60% to 90% of covered expenses. A catastrophic plan can be purchased for much less, but these have very high deductibles and, for early retirees, are only available to those who qualify for a hardship exemption.”

“If you are thinking of retiring prior to age 65, you should review your health insurance options at the government’s website, www.HealthCare.gov,” Mahaney concludes.

The full white paper can be found here: Early Retirement and the Affordable Care Act

Study Gauges Worker Reaction to State-Run Retirement Plan

The majority of workers surveyed say such a program would be good for them, but a significant number still would not save or save enough.

A survey of workers not covered by an employer-sponsored retirement plan, conducted for the state of California, shows most think a state-run plan is a good idea.

Workers were told the California Secure Choice Retirement Savings Plan would automatically deduct a percentage of their pay and deposit it into an individual account for them; they would have the option to opt out or change the automatic enrollment percentage. Their accounts would be invested in an age-based fund managed by a private company selected and monitored by the state. At retirement, they could choose to convert their account balance into a lifetime annuity. Half were told they would be automatically enrolled at 3% of pay and the other half were presented with a 5% automatic deferral rate.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

Six in seven of the 1,000 workers surveyed think it is a good idea, including 57% who say it is a very good idea. When shown an example of how savings in such a program could grow over time, 55% say it would be excellent or very good for them and another 26% say it would be good. Most respondents indicate they would participate in the program, with retention rates in the program higher for women than for men (77% vs. 71%) and the likelihood of staying the program increasing as personal income increases.

Automatically increasing contributions by 1% annually up to a maximum of 10% will not prevent most uncovered workers from participating—81% would stay in the program if it included automatic escalation.  However, about one-third of workers would not participate if they could not access their money if they became seriously ill (32%) or if their spouse dies (32%). More than one-quarter would not participate if they could not access their money in the event of a job loss (28%) or a family member becoming seriously ill.

The study has relevance for states other than California that are starting or contemplating a state-run retirement program, and for the Department of Labor (DOL), which will soon issue guidance in support of this effort to expand retirement plan coverage for workers.

NEXT: Not all would embrace coverage

While the study found the vast majority of uncovered workers have the desire and the ability to put at least some money aside for retirement, not all would embrace coverage in a state-run plan.

They agree that saving for retirement is important (96% very or somewhat important), but retirement ranks second as an overall savings priority (45% rank it first or second out of six potential savings needs) after having an emergency fund. Nearly all indicate they could save at least some amount in a retirement savings plan available at work; however, two-thirds feel the most they could contribute is less than $100 per month.

When presented with the California Secure Choice Retirement Savings Plan, one-quarter of workers say they would opt out, regardless of whether the automatic enrollment deferral percentage is 3% or 5%. Eighteen percent would ask to have their deferral percentage changes. Of that group, 32% of those presented with a 3% deferral rate and 43% of those presented with a 5% deferral rate would ask that their deferral percentage lowered.

If the plan automatically escalated deferrals each year, one-third indicate they would ask their employer to stop auto escalation.

The leading barriers for not saving more for retirement include low earnings and the debt burden they carry—these two issues are the primary reasons for more than half of uncovered workers. Four in ten say a major reason is that they are more focused on their family, and nearly as many (36%) report that dealing with unexpected expenses is a major reason they don’t save more.

A report of study findings is here.

«