Too Short a Review, One Group Says

As expected, financial services advocacy groups have plenty to say on the proposed fiduciary rule by the Department of Labor (DOL).

The DOL rule, now in the comment period, addresses how financial advisers and broker/dealers can sell investment products and deliver investment advice to consumers under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA).

The Financial Services Institute (FSI) expressed disappointment with the amount of time—50 days—that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) took to review the rule, which they called “highly controversial.” The rule could negatively impact millions of investors, the FSI said in a statement that cited the office taking an average 117 days to review DOL rules.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

“Over 200 bipartisan members of Congress have told the DOL and the administration to carefully consider the impact of the proposal on investor access to retirement advice, products and services,” Dale Brown, president and chief executive of FSI, said in a statement. “Most expected the OMB would take as long as necessary to ensure that any final rule avoids serious unintended consequences for Main Street investors. We have serious concerns that could have happened in only 50 days.”

The Financial Planning Coalition called the proposed rule an important step in updating regulation going back to ERISA to provide greater protections for Americans and their retirement nest eggs. “The financial advice Americans are given related to their retirement savings should always be squarely in their best interest, and should not undermine their efforts to meet financial goals,” a coalition spokesman said in a statement. “The DOL’s rulemaking should proceed without further delay to full and open public evaluation and comment.”

The Financial Planning Coalition comprises the Certified Financial Planner Board of Standards (CFP Board), the Financial Planning Association (FPA) and the National Association of Personal Financial Advisors (NAPFA).

FSI advocates on behalf of independent financial advisers and independent financial services firms.

New York State Moves to Create Its Own PRT Standards

Filed as Senate Bill 1092 and Assembly Bill 6796, a new initiative in the New York State Legislature seeks to expand and strengthen scrutiny paid to pension risk transfer transactions enacted by employers in the state.

State Senator Tony Avella, a Democrat from New York’s 11th District, introduced the bill alongside Assembly Member Peter Abbate, a Democrat from the 49th District. The identical bills would require that companies moving to convert pensions to annuities provide “proper disclosures related to the transaction for all impacted retirees.”

As Abbate and Avella note, “The purpose of the bill is to provide necessary protection to retirees whose pension plans are entirely divested of all Employee Retirement Income Security Act [ERISA] and Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation [PBGC] [safeguards] as a result of a group annuity purchase from a life insurance company.”

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

The bill also prohibits the subsequent transfer of the retirees’ pension benefits without the confirmation of the New York State Superintendent of Financial Services that the insurer acquiring the group annuity contract has the financial strength to fulfill its long-term obligations to all retirees.  

Specifically, provisions of the bill would amend state insurance law by adding a new Section 3219-a to New York’s Civil Practice Law and Rules (CPLR), relating to pension de-risking transactions with an annuity. The section requires that an annuity issued by an insurance company licensed to do business in the state, which sells an annuity intended to provide pension benefits to retirees of any company, corporation, limited liability company or association must include the following features:

A clear statement that payments to annuitants under an annuity contract issued pursuant to this section are exempt from the claims of creditors;

A statement that the retirees will no longer have protection under ERISA and the PBGC;

The identity and contact information for the New York Life and Health Insurance Guaranty Association, or any substitute or replacement guaranty association that provides coverage to annuitants residing in New York in the event of the insurer’s financial impairment or insolvency, as set forth on a publicly available website such as that maintained by the Life Insurance Co. Guaranty Corp. of New York (www.nylifega.org); and

Mandatory annual disclosures to all retires whose benefits are transferred to an insurance company or alternative benefit provider for the purpose of providing retirement benefits, of the following: funding levels of all assets relative to expected liabilities under the assumed pension benefit schedules, investment performance summary by asset class, investment performance detail by asset class, expenses associated with any group annuity contract, changes in actuarial assumptions, if any.

Other provisions will prohibit transfer or assumption of pension assets and liabilities to another insurer without confirmation by the superintendent that the insurer assuming the obligations of such allocated or unallocated group annuity contract has the financial strength to fulfill its obligations under such contract. In addition, the proceeds of any such allocated or unallocated group annuity contract issued “shall be exempt from application to the satisfaction of money judgments under Section 5200 give of the CPLR.”

Section 2 of the bill amends Paragraph 2 of Subdivision (1) of Section 5205 of the CPLR, as amended by Chapter 24 of the laws of 2009, by adding that “Statutorily exempt payments” shall specifically include “any annuity proceeds whose benefits are transferred to an insurance company or alternative benefit provider for the purpose of providing retirement benefits pursuant to Section 3219-a of the insurance law in a pension de-risking transfer.”

Section 3, lastly, sets forth an effective date of 120 days “after [the bill] shall have become law and shall apply to all policies and contracts issued, renewed, altered, or amended on or after such date.”

Full text of the bill is available here

«