2020
PLANADVISER Micro Plan Survey

Micro plans have much to gain from adviser help with fiduciary matters

Industry Data

Industry Data


Top and Bottom 5 Industries for Micro Plans1,
in Terms of ...
Average Participation Rate
Top Bottom
1 Govt: City/Municipal 100.0% 44 Education: K-12, Preschool 59.8%
2 Insurance/Reinsurance 93.2% 45 Transportation/Airlines 59.3%
3 Utilities 92.5% 46 Automotive: Manufacturing 58.5%
4 Fortune 1000 85.8% 47 Restaurants/Food Service 58.4%
5 Research/Development 85.7% 48 Auto: Dealerships/Service 50.9%
Average Account Balance
Top Bottom
1 Utilities $170,322 44 Non-Profit Orgs $45,015
2 Law Firms $138,364 45 Telecommunications $39,988
3 Financial Services $122,575 46 Religious/Social Services $38,830
4 Insurance/Reinsurance $115,256 47 Auto: Manufacturing $29,795
5 Consulting $115,103 48 Restaurants/Food Service $28,543
Average Deferral Rate
Top Bottom
1 Chemicals/Mining 10.3% 44 Telecommunications 5.3%
2 Membership 9.2% 45 Equipment Sales 5.0%
3 Utilities 9.1% 46 Holding Co's/Inv Banking 5.0%
4 Law Firms 8.6% 47 Auto: Dealerships/Service 4.8%
5 Education: Higher Ed 8.5% 48 Agriculture 4.1%
Immediate Eligibility
Top Bottom
1 Healthcare (not for profit) 70.5% 44 Hotels/Gaming 4.1%
2 Education: K-12, Preschool 60.8% 45 Membership 4.0%
3 Religious/Social Services 56.2% 46 Manufacturing: Consumer 2.6%
4 Education: Higher Ed 50.0% 47 Restaurants/Food service 0.0%
5 Govt: County/State/Federal 50.0% 48 Agriculture 0.0%
1Rankings are limited to those industries that met established quotas.


Survey Profile

Type(s) of DC Plan(s) Offered
All Plans <$1MM $1MM–$5MM
401(k) 88% 91% 93%
Profit sharing 18% 12% 16%
403(b) 11% 6% 7%
457 10% 5% 5%
Nonqualified deferred compensation (NQDC) 10% 1% 2%
ESOP2/KSOP3 3% 0% 1%
Money purchase 2% 1% 2%
SIMPLE4 IRA 1% 2% 1%
SEP5 0% 1% 0%
Other 3% 2% 2%
2Employee stock ownership plan.
3A combination ESOP and 401(k)plan.
4Savings incentive match plan for employees individual retirement plan.
5Simplified employee pension.


Use of Advisers

Adviser Use Among Plans

Adviser Use Among Plans
All Plans <$1MM $1MM–$5MM
Use a plan adviser 70% 50% 63%
Do not use a plan adviser 22% 31% 25%
Unsure/Don’t know 8% 19% 13%
Use of Services Provided by Plan Advisers
All Plans <$1MM $1MM–$5MM
Review of fund performance 93% 83% 90%
Plan investment selection guidance 82% 63% 76%
Evaluating/Explaining provider fees 77% 56% 67%
Presenting to plan committees 72% 34% 57%
Creation/Monitoring of IPS6 65% 44% 51%
Benchmarking plan design 61% 44% 51%
One-on-one participant education 61% 63% 80%
Provider selection/due diligence 60% 42% 53%
Group participant education 58% 52% 76%
Ensuring plan alignment with objectives 52% 46% 58%
Plan compliance with laws and IPS 47% 40% 43%
Developing/Delivering fiduciary training 35% 18% 28%
Technical help with corporate transactions 31% 24% 33%
6Investment policy statement
Financial Education Offered by Employers
All Plans <$1MM $1MM–$5MM
Saving strategies/prioritization 48% 22% 32%
Financial markets/Investing basics 42% 22% 29%
Budgeting 40% 19% 25%
Rolling over past balances into the plan 36% 20% 29%
Rollover options for separating employees 32% 15% 26%
Retirement health care costs/savings options 29% 13% 19%
Social Security withdrawal options/strategies 26% 10% 15%
Credit/Debt management 25% 11% 14%
College saving 23% 12% 13%
Tax/Estate planning 23% 11% 13%
Student Loans 15% 3% 7%
Home buying 14% 6% 8%

Adviser Fiduciary Status

Financial Education Offered by Employers
All Plans <$1MM $1MM–$5MM
3(21) fiduciary 40% 21% 25%
3(38) fiduciary 19% 19% 18%
Adviser is not a plan fiduciary 10% 13% 13%
Have both a 3(21) and a 3(38) adviser 2% 1% 2%
Unsure/Don’t know 29% 45% 41%

Does Your Plan Employ a Third Party as a 3(16) Fiduciary?

Does Your Plan Employ a Third Party as a 3(16) Fiduciary
All Plans <$1MM $1MM–$5MM
Yes, limited scope7 34% 29% 31%
Yes, broad scope8 23% 19% 24%
No 34% 28% 32%
Unsure/Don’t know 9% 24% 12%
7The third party has only limited-scope acceptance of some (vs. all) of the functions of the plan administrator; responsibility for actions outside of this scope is retained by plan officials.
8The third party has broad-scope acceptance of the administrator role, including to be named as the plan administrator in the plan document.


Plan Design

Plan Design Elements
All Plans <$1MM $1MM–$5MM
Loan provision 82% 69% 75%
Roth feature 77% 63% 72%
Investment policy statement 70% 44% 52%
Safe harbor 56% 69% 68%
Automatic enrollment 48% 26% 26%
Fee equalization policy 42% 22% 31%
Automatic escalation 40% 13% 18%

Participation Eligibility

Participation Eligibility
All Plans <$1MM $1MM–$5MM
Immediately upon hire 37% 20% 20%
Within 3 months of hire 31% 21% 24%
Within 4 - 11 months of hire 12% 17% 17%
At 1 year from date of hire 19% 38% 37%
After >1 year from date of hire 1% 2% 2%

Automatic Features

Auto-Enrollment Default Deferral Rate

Auto-Enrollment Default Deferral Rate
All Plans <$1MM $1MM–$5MM
<3% 10% 9% 13%
3% 40% 36% 47%
>3% – 5% 24% 32% 17%
>5% 23% 19% 15%

Re-Enrollment Actions Taken in Past 12 – 18 Months

Re-Enrollment Actions Taken in Past 12 – 18 Months
All Plans <$1MM $1MM–$5MM
Re-enrolled employees not participating in the plan (requiring them to opt out again or else be enrolled) 19% 13% 13%
Re-enrolled participants saving below the default deferral rate (thus boosting their deferral rate) 11% 6% 5%
Re-enrolled participants not invested in the default investment (meaning current/ future contributions go into the plan default investment) 5% 3% 7%
We have not re-enrolled any employees/ participants 75% 81% 79%


Investments

Composition of Investment Committee for the DC Plan
All Plans <$1MM $1MM–$5MM
Internal employees only 43% 16% 25%
Employees and non-employees 31% 10% 21%
No investment committee 18% 54% 41%
Unsure/Don’t know 4% 16% 8%
External non-employees only 3% 4% 4%
Unsure of composition 1% 1% 2%
Income-Oriented Products/Services Offered
All Plans <$1MM $1MM–$5MM
At retirement: Systematic withdrawal option 44% 28% 29%
In-plan: Professional managed account service 24% 13% 18%
In-plan: No guarantees 10% 10% 9%
In-plan: Guaranteed monthly income 9% 9% 8%
Out-of-plan: Annuity purchase 5% 4% 3%
No income-oriented products 48% 65% 63%

Frequency of Formal Review of Investment Options

Frequency of Formal Review of Investment Options
All Plans <$1MM $1MM–$5MM
Quarterly 41% 19% 20%
Twice a year 16% 5% 14%
Annually 30% 42% 43%
Every 1 to 2 years 3% 4% 4%
Every >2 years 3% 3% 4%
Unsure/Don't know 8% 28% 16%
Types of Investment Options Offered
All Plans <$1MM $1MM–$5MM
Target-date funds 81% 59% 76%
Balanced fund(s) 66% 53% 68%
Money market fund 57% 43% 57%
Stable value fund 57% 24% 37%
Target-risk funds–e.g., growth, conservative. 41% 39% 52%
Professionally managed account service 31% 20% 27%
Real estate/REITs9 27% 14% 21%
Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) 11% 6% 9%
Sector Funds 11% 8% 10%
Commodity Funds (i.e., gold/precious metals, oil) 7% 3% 6%
Employer stock 6% 1% 1%
Alternative investments–e.g., hedge funds, private equity. 5% 6% 5%
9Real estate investment trusts.
Investment Vehicles Used in DC Plan
All Plans <$1MM $1MM–$5MM
Mutual funds 93% 87% 90%
Self-directed brokerage window 23% 16% 14%
Separate accounts 20% 20% 20%
Collective investment trusts 19% 15% 9%
ETFs10 (outside of brokerage windows) 10% 11% 13%
Mutual fund window 5% 6% 6%
10Exchange-traded funds

Number of Investment Options Offered

All Plans
22.9
Average

<$1mm
20.8
Average

$1mm – $5mm
25.3
Average

All Plans
21.0
Median

<$1mm
20.5
Median

$1mm – $5mm
24.0
Median

Number of Investment Options Held by Participants

All Plans
6.3
Average

<$1mm
6.0
Average

$1mm – $5mm
7.3
Average

All Plans
4.0
Median

<$1mm
3.0
Median

$1mm – $5mm
5.0
Median


Company Match

A Matching Contribution Offered?

Matching Contribution Offered
All Plans <$1MM $1MM–$5MM
Yes 75% 67% 71%
No 24% 30% 28%
Unsure/Don’t know 1% 3% 2%

A ‘True-Up’11 Provision for Matching Contributions

‘True-Up’ Provision for Matching Contributions
All Plans <$1MM $1MM–$5MM
Yes 40% 19% 23%
No 42% 40% 43%
Unsure/Don’t know 18% 41% 34%
11A true-up match may be used to restore matching contributions “lost” when an employee reaches the annual contribution limit prior to year-end.
Participants Maximizing Match
All Plans <$1MM $1MM–$5MM
All or nearly all participants (>90%) 26% 36% 30%
Vast majority (>75% – 90%) 27% 19% 22%
More than average (>50% – 75%) 21% 10% 16%
Less than average (>25% – 50%) 12% 11% 13%
A small minority (10% – 25%) 5% 9% 5%
Very few (<10%) 4% 7% 6%
Unsure/Don’t know 6% 8% 7%

Frequency of Matching Contributions

Frequency of Matching Contributions
All Plans <$1MM $1MM–$5MM
Annually 14% 14% 15%
Quarterly 2% 1% 1%
Monthly – Non-pay-period 2% 6% 2%
Twice monthly – Non-pay-period 1% 2% 1%
Biweekly – Non-pay-period 2% 5% 2%
Per pay period 79% 73% 79%
Other 1% 0% 1%

Approximate Maximum Match

Approximate Maximum Match
All Plans <$1MM $1MM–$5MM
>100% of first 6% of salary 5% 6% 4%
100% of first 6% of salary 15% 14% 13%
51% – 99% of first 6% of salary 35% 34% 37%
50% of first 6% of salary 22% 19% 22%
>50% of first 6% of salary 18% 20% 18%
Other 6% 9% 6%

How Long Before Participants Are 100% Vested?

When Participants Are 100% Vested
All Plans <$1MM $1MM–$5MM
Immediately on enrollment 37% 42% 35%
1 year or less 6% 10% 6%
2 years 6% 3% 4%
3 years 13% 6% 10%
4 years 4% 4% 3%
5 years 17% 12% 20%
6 or more years 17% 15% 22%
Unsure/Don't know 1% 8% 2%


DC Providers

Length of Relationship With Plan Recordkeeper

Length of Relationship With Provider
All Plans <$1MM $1MM–$5MM
<1 year 3% 6% 2%
1 year to 3 years 14% 23% 18%
>3 years to 5 years 15% 17% 18%
>5 years to 7 years 12% 12% 14%
>7 years 56% 41% 48%
Unsure/Don’t know 0% 2% 0%
Frequency of Formal Review of Providers
All Plans <$1MM $1MM–$5MM
Annually 64% 56% 69%
Every 1 to 2 years 9% 9% 7%
Every >2 to 3 years 9% 6% 5%
Every >3 to 5 years 6% 3% 4%
Every >5 years 2% 2% 1%
Unsure/Don’t know 10% 25% 14%

Costs/Fees

Who Pays for Plan’s Administrative/Recordkeeping Costs?

Who Pays for Plan’s Administrative/Recordkeeping Costs
All Plans <$1MM $1MM–$5MM
Plan, via participants 48% 17% 29%
Employer 31% 51% 45%
Both 13% 15% 13%
Unsure/Don’t know 8% 17% 13%
Approximate Average Expense Ratio of Plan Investments
All Plans <$1MM $1MM–$5MM
<0.25% (<25 bps12) 18% 15% 13%
0.25% – 0.50% (25 – 50 bps) 27% 12% 19%
>0.50% – 0.75% (51– 75 bps) 14% 12% 11%
>0.75% –1.0% (76 –100 bps) 7% 8% 9%
>1.0% – 1.5% (101– 150 bps) 3% 3% 7%
>1.5% (>150 bps) 1% 2% 1%
Unsure/Don’t know 31% 48% 41%
12Basis points

Frequency of Formal Review of Administrative Costs/Fees

Frequency of Formal Review of Administrative Costs/Fees
All Plans <$1MM $1MM–$5MM
Annually 74% 67% 74%
Every 1 to 2 years 10% 7% 10%
Every >2 to 3 years 6% 3% 4%
Every >3 to 5 years 2% 0% 1%
Every >5 years 1% 1% 1%
Unsure/Don’t know 7% 23% 10%

Were Total Plan Fees Calculated for the Prior Plan Year?

Were Total Plan Fees Calculated for the Prior Plan Year
All Plans <$1MM $1MM–$5MM
Yes, and we externally benchmarked our plan’s cost/fees as part of the process 42% 15% 26%
Yes, and we plan to externally benchmark our plan’s cost/fees in the near future 7% 5% 6%
Yes, but we did not externally benchmark our plan’s cost/fees 19% 17% 21%
No, but we intend to calculate total fees in the next 6 months 3% 6% 5%
No, but we may do it at some point in the future 14% 33% 24%
Unsure/Don’t know 14% 24% 18%


Results

Participation Rate (Average)

Participation Rate Average

Participation Rate (Median)

Participation Rate Median

Account Balance (Average)

Account Balance Average

Account Balance (Median)

Account Balance Median)
Participants Making Hardship Withdrawals
All Plans <$1MM $1MM–$5MM
Average 1% 1% 1%
Median 0% 0% 0%
Participants With Loans Outstanding
All Plans <$1MM $1MM–$5MM
Average 14% 14% 14%
Median 11% 3% 8%
Success Measures Used
All Plans <$1MM $1MM–$5MM
Participation rates 71% 38% 55%
Deferral rates 60% 26% 40%
External benchmarking of plan design 30% 10% 16%
Participants saving to match 25% 11% 15%
Employee satisfaction with plan (survey) 16% 6% 13%
Participant assets allocated “appropriately” 15% 5% 7%
Participants using advice tools/seminars offered 15% 5% 6%
Participants increasing deferral rates in past year 12% 3% 7%
Participants meeting income replacement goals 11% 5% 5%
Participants meeting projected retirement income goals 10% 3% 6%
Have no formal plan success measures 22% 53% 35%