SEC’s New Stock Buyback Rules Come Under Legal Challenge

The Chamber of Commerce has sued the SEC in the 5th Circuit and seeks a review of a new SEC final rule which requires disclosures related to stock buybacks.


The Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America filed a legal challenge on Tuesday against the Securities and Exchange Commission’s final rule on stock buyback disclosure. The rule was finalized on May 3.

The business advocacy group’s petition for review was received by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit on May 12. The Longview (Texas) Chamber of Commerce and the Texas Association of Business are also listed as petitioners, allowing the claim to be filed in the 5th Circuit, which includes Louisiana, Mississippi and Texas.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

The Chamber of Commerce’s press release stated that buybacks help distribute capital efficiently and increase returns for investors. In the Chamber of Commerce’s view, the SEC’s final rule would air sensitive managerial decisions and amounts to government micromanagement. The Chamber of Commerce also expressed skepticism that the SEC is trying to protect investors with the rule and accused the regulator of trying to reduce the frequency of buybacks by creating additional disclosure rules. The petition for review asks the 5th Circuit to review the rule without providing any specific points of contention.

A 2002 D.C. Circuit decision in Sierra Club v. EPA held that petitioners “must either identify … evidence sufficient to support its standing to seek review or … submit additional evidence to the court of appeals.”

The SEC’s final rule requires stock issuers to disclose daily share repurchasing data in their quarterly or semi-annual reports and adds Item 408(d) to forms 10-Q and 10-K for this purpose. Issuers will have to disclose the day(s) the shares were bought back, the number purchased and the average price at which they repurchased the shares. They must also disclose the objective or rationales for the buybacks and the criteria used to determine the size of the buyback.

Lastly, issuers will have to disclose policies related to transactions in the issuer’s securities during the repurchase program by its directors; if executives traded within four days of announcing the buyback; if the buyback was done for purposes related to a 10b5 plan; and the creation or termination of any 10b5 plans from their directors and executives.

A 10b5 plan is a trading plan which allows insiders, such as executives, to schedule trades in their company’s stock under pre-defined parameters. The plan is not mandatory but can be used as an affirmative defense against insider trading. The SEC finalized a rule in December 2022 which requires a “cooling off” period of three months before an insider could trade on those plans to prevent them from creating a 10b5 and trading the next day.

Though SEC Chairman Gary Gensler did not mention insider trading in his statement accompanying the announcement of the final rule, it appears to have informed his decision to finalize the stock buyback rule. He explained that the rule would reduce “information asymmetries” between a company engaging in a buyback, which is highly knowledgeable of its own business, and investors who might not be. The SEC also packaged 10b5 plan and executive trading disclosure along with stock buyback disclosure into the same rule.

Stock buybacks are one way to return value to investors. They have a lesser tax liability than paying dividends and can increase share prices. The practice has drawn criticism from Democrats. President Joe Biden identified it as a policy priority in February’s State of the Union address and proposed increasing the stock buyback tax to 4% from 1%, and legislation proposed in February by Senators Sherrod Brown and Ron Wyden, D-Ohio and D-Oregon, respectively, would do just that.

Research from asset manager Janus Henderson found that in 2022 share buybacks hit a record level of $1.3 trillion worldwide.

The huge wave of buybacks “is not a one-year phenomenon,” the Janus report stated. Buybacks have almost tripled in value since 2012, up 182%, besting the 54% growth in dividends during the same period.

The SEC rule passed by a 3 to 2 vote. SEC Commissioner Mark Uyeda said the rule was unfair to foreign issuers who otherwise would make these disclosures in accordance with the requirements of their home jurisdictions, but this rule applies to them as well. Uyeda explained: “This change fundamentally upends the Commission’s long-standing and bipartisan approach of largely deferring to the disclosures made by FPIs pursuant to their home country reporting requirements.”

Giving Older Workers the Choice to Work or Retire with Dignity

Older workers do not have the means to retire, and others are working in subpar labor conditions, according to experts from the EPI.  


Older workers should be given the choice to continue working or transition to retirement, experts said in a webinar hosted by the Economic Policy Institute, but often they are not given the decision-making power.

Whether it’s coming from employers, or government programs, older workers need support when it comes to working and retirement, according to the panelists. At the moment, that type of support is lacking, and sometimes the current workplace can actively work against a comfortable retirement.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

“Many older workers are stuck in these bad jobs, unable to save for retirement and are eventually forced out into poverty,” said Siavash Radpour, associate research director, ReLab at the Schwartz Center for Economic Policy Analysis. “They are trapped with no way out.”

Economists and other experts tend to be biased in favor of extending work into old age, said Monique Morrissey, an economist at the Economic Policy Institute. She said many underestimated how many workers have difficult and even dangerous jobs.

“I think economists should be neutral about when workers retire because leisure and consumption both are ways of improving living standard, meaning retirement in this case,” said Morrissey. “We know that many older workers right now can’t afford to retire and meet basic expenses. If working longer is a response to inadequate retirement savings and benefits, the solution at least for future generations should be expanding work opportunities and retirement coverage at younger ages, rather than working longer into old age.”

Social Security

Morrissey said the most straightforward way to allow old workers to retire is to increase social security contributions and benefits. There are some who have suggested further raising Social Security’s full retirement age, which has already been increased from 65 to 67. However, such across the board benefit cut would be deeply unpopular. Social Security voters across the political spectrum have expressed that they prefer to contribute more and not receive less.

“We should listen to these voters and workers since they’re the ones doing the work,” said Morrissey.

As for older workers who do want to continue working, Rep. Don Beyer, Congressman, Virginia’s 8th District, introduced legislation to establish an Older Workers’ Bureau in November 2022.   

“We can pass the Older Workers’ Bureau Act,” Rep. Beyer said on the webinar. “It’ll establish an Older Workers’ Bureau and it will be designed to improve the working conditions and the wellbeing of older workers, as well as advance employment opportunities. … We’re researching age discrimination, wages paid to older workers, job security, among other data points. The Bureau will also conduct outreach to relevant institutions and agencies, because they all need to work together.”

Furthermore, an Older Workers’ Bureau will be able to provide legitimacy and dignity to seniors in the labor force, said Teresa Ghilarducci, director at the Schwartz Center for Economic Policy Analysis.

Widespread Support

“I speak to a lot of workers, labor unions, senior halls and they brighten up. These are people who are 70 or 50. When I say that you are supporting an Older Workers’ Bureau for the federal government it gives instant legitimacy to their role in society,” said Ghilarducci.

The director said it reminded her of what happened when the women’s Bureau was established in the 1920s. “It instantly gave status and respected dignity to these groups of workers that are pushed out or just not paid attention to,” she said.

Ultimately, the experts agreed that working Americans should be given the choice of whether they want to work or retire.

“You work your lifetime,” Radpour said. “When you’re old you deserve to work if you want to and retire if you want to. We’re not saying everyone should retire or everyone should work. We’re saying you deserve to have the choice. And the choice will empower you to have better work and better retirement.”

«