Dunlap served for eight years as the Southern region division
vice president for Transamerica Retirement Services, where he was responsible
for recruiting and supervising 14 regional vice presidents. Before joining
Transamerica, he was the regional vice president for ING in the Carolinas.
From 1999 to 2003, Dunlap worked at Pan-American Retirement
Services as the Eastern sales director. He began his career in financial
services at Jefferson Pilot Life, where he worked in the pension department as
a colleague of Mike Quinlivan, who is now the founder and CEO of Pension
Planning $olutions.
“Steve and I have worked together in the past, and
his extensive sales experience in the financial services industry will be of
great value to us,” says Mike Quinlivan, founder and CEO of Pension
Planning $olutions. “I am very excited to have him on board.”
Dunlap is a chartered financial consultant (CHFC) and
accredited investment fiduciary (AIF). He holds a Chartered Life Underwriter
(CLU) designation, and he is in the process of earning a Qualified Plan
Financial Consultant (QPFC) designation. He graduated from the University of
North Carolina at Greensboro in 1978 with a Bachelor of Science in economics and business administration.
By using this site you agree to our network wide Privacy Policy.
According
to a white paper released by OppenheimerFunds, “Globalization: A New Era for
Defined Contribution Plans,” many plan participants tend to overweight their
investment portfolios with investments from U.S. markets, which can be hurting
their chance to generate enough income for their retirement. The paper, which
is co-written by Kathleen Beichert, senior vice president of retirement
solutions; and Brian Levitt, senior economist at OppenheimerFunds, looks at the
importance of a global perspective in asset allocation.
The
research shows that many DC plan participants do not understand the big picture
of participating globally as investors, nor are they likely to realize the
potential they could miss if they fail to do so. Thirty-five percent of
survey respondents prefer to invest in U.S.-based funds. The white paper’s
authors say this suggests a home bias against overseas investing.
The
survey also found 60% of plan participants do not understand the basic
difference between international investments and global investments, which is the
key to evaluating investment opportunities beyond the U.S.
Approximately 57% of respondents stated they believe the U.S. equity market
has been the world’s top performer more than twice between 1970 and 2000, while
96% of them did not know that Peruvian equities outperformed U.S. equities in
2010.
Respondents also mistakenly assume that investing overseas means taking on
disproportionate risk. More than half of the respondents (52%) cited political
and market risks as their primary concerns when investing in international
markets, while 17% cited currency risk.
PLANADVISER spoke with Levitt, who said he thinks investors
generally have a home bias.
“There is a general sense that investments outside the U.S. are riskier,” he
said.
Levitt added that it is important for plan participants to realize they need
to look beyond where a company is headquartered when it comes to investing, it
is far more important to be more aware of how business is for that particular
company.
Despite the fact that participants should be investing in global funds, many
are not, because they do not understand the need for global exposure. Also,
according to the paper’s authors, plan sponsors are not conveying the growing
importance of investing globally to participants.
Next Steps for Sponsors and Advisers
Levitt told PLANADVISER that plan sponsors are making global
equities and global fixed income available in their investment lineups to plan
participants; however, it is hard to get participants to think about these
types of investments.
It is important for plan sponsors to make sure their DC advice programs
include sections and components that cover investing in both global and
international funds. This also sets up the opportunity for advisers to help set
the tone for these programs as they are created and rolled out to participants.
According to the white paper, the way to go about doing this is through
basic education on the difference between global and international investing
and the growing importance of emerging markets. Another option is to offer an
in-depth explanation or even one-on-one advice with participants. Advisers can
emphasize websites, apps, online tools, videos and other resources designed to
educate consumers about global investing.
Participants Want Education
According to the survey conducted by OppenheimerFunds, 21% of respondents
believe that changing their asset allocation, a likely outcome of learning
about global investing, would help them achieve their retirement savings
goals. Twelve percent of respondents indicated they want to invest in
global/international investments on their own, and 88% would consider investing
in global/international investments if they received assistance.
One-third (33%) of respondents state that learning about investing through
advice (25%) and with educational programs from their employer (8%) would help
them meet their retirement goals.
Levitt added, “It comes down to education. It comes down to understanding
why as an investor you want to think about companies not countries.” Plan
sponsors and plan advisers need to educate participants and get them to see how
the world is changing, and how they need to change with it accordingly.