PANC 2018: Future Faces of Advising

In order to remain relevant, speakers said, the retirement plan industry must become more diverse.

During the “Future Faces of Advising” panel at the 2018 PLANADVISER National Conference, an audience poll revealed that retirement plan advisory practices do have some diversity on their teams, in terms of having women and/or minorities on the staff. The poll disclosed that 40% have less than 20% of their staff being diverse, but for 23%, it is between 20% and 49%, and for 14%, it is 50%.

Another audience poll question, about how much diversity is on the committees that retirement plan advisers are working with, showed that 54% of these committees are diverse—suggesting that if advisers want to align with their plan sponsor clients, their teams need to become more diverse.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

Yet another question revealed that advisers are aware of the importance of becoming more diverse, with 32% saying it is very important for their practice, and 46% saying it is somewhat important.

The panel included Melissa Cowan, executive director at Morgan Stanley, also vice president of the Women in Pensions Network, which has 700 members and 20 chapters around the country. The aim of the network is to “elevate women into the role of financial adviser, which, for many, they may not be comfortable with.” Keith Gredys, chairman and CEO of Kidder Advisers, LLC, said he is “always trying to push the envelope.” Kidder Advisers’ third-party administrator team is 75%  female, but its adviser team is 80% male, he said. “There are obstacles that need to be overcome,” he said. “Demographics are changing, and we need to stay relevant.”

Emphasizing her point, Morgan Stanley “would not hire a group that doesn’t embrace diversity,” Cowan said. “Without diversity, you can’t get the best and the brightest. Folks want diversity on their teams but have difficulty getting there.”

Diversity also means hiring young people, Cowan said. The benefit of doing so is that you gain “different perspectives,” she said. It also gives you insight into what younger people want from their retirement plan and has the added benefit of naturally creating a succession plan, Gredys said.

Many of the requests for proposal (RFPs) that sponsors are issuing today ask directly about the construction of the team, the panelists agreed. Some sponsors say they are expressly looking to hire minority-owned or diverse businesses. If a practice is neither of those things, it may not even get in the door to do a presentation.

As a whole, the retirement plan industry needs to figure out a way to attract women and minorities to join the field, Gredys said. “There is still this feeling that being an adviser or broker is shady,” he said. 

Suggesting another potential solution, Morgan Stanley has a specific program to help women re-enter the workforce after raising their children, Cowan said. Another potential source of candidates could be community colleges, Gredys said. Another is an internship program, he added.

In order to make retirement planning a more attractive career path, he continued, the industry needs to make this goal “a priority” and persistently address it. “Educate potential candidates that this business is about relationships,” Gredys said. “We have to move quickly because advisers’ average age is mid-50s. This is a cultural change we need to address.”

Cowan noted that many women are afraid to move into sales jobs. “Change the description of these roles,” she suggested.

Detailed Plan and Participant Analytics Can Improve Retirement Readiness

Willis Towers Watson believes that sponsors must analyze the retirement adequacy and meaningful benchmarks for individuals or segments of the population.

Defined contribution (DC) retirement plan sponsors can strengthen their plan governance and improve their plans’ return on investment by using detailed analytics that evaluate specific segments of their employee population based on age, job category, tenure and benefit structure, according to a Willis Towers Watson report.

The firm says the right analytics highlight those employees and groups most at risk, and allow plan sponsors to determine which participant tools and strategies best prepare employees for retirement.

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

Although 83% of plan sponsors in Willis Towers Watson’s 2017 DC sponsor survey cited retirement readiness as a top priority, their efforts don’t yet reflect that concern. Only 17% allocate time to discussing retirement readiness during committee meetings, noting that greater attention still goes to evaluation of investment managers and monitoring fund performance. Only one-third of DC plan committees analyze retirement readiness annually, and fewer than half assess readiness at least every three years.

According to the report, insufficient attention to retirement readiness may be compounded by a lack of information useful in setting objectives for improvement. Willis Towers Watson believes plan-wide statistics on mean or median participation rates, balances or contribution rates measure aggregate data on all participants but offer little in the way of insight into retirement adequacy and meaningful benchmarks for individuals or segments of the population.

The firm says more detailed analytics will help plan sponsors develop objectives and an overall plan strategy that foster retirement readiness in two key ways. The first considers those steps plan sponsors take on their own through plan design to establish participation, saving and investment. The second looks at the tactics used to motivate participants to take financial action, including improving behaviors to increase savings, tax efficiency, investing and spending.

Example in practice

Gregg Levinson, senior director, Retirement, Willis Towers Watson, tells PLANADVISER one client quarterly evaluates its DC plans’ metrics to assess the effectiveness of design, options, tools and participant usage as a way to measure potential outcomes. It is part of a larger wellbeing evaluation program.

Willis Towers Watson collects data from the DC plans’ vendors related to participant transactions including:

  • Eligibility;
  • Participation;
  • Deferral rates/changes;
  • Investment allocation;
  • In-service distributions/loans; and
  • Managed account/advice.

The firm presents the information to the client through an interactive DC dashboard designed to highlight key indicators and important changes.

The analytics finds that overall, plans are operating well, but there are some key areas of focus. For example, there is an inefficient use of plan investment offerings; there are too many single fund holders outside target-date funds and some participants use too many target-date funds. The analytics also shows a disparity between participants using managed account/advice services and those that do not. Those using the services have increased deferral rates, more efficient investment allocations, and lower in-service withdrawal/loan rates.

According to Levinson, these trends have been consistent, but the plan sponsor prefers to keep watch to gather a deeper trend line. However, the plan sponsor is already questioning what it is about the managed account/advice services that makes better participants. Did these participants start off better and therefore took advantage of these resources? How can this be translated to the population as a whole—should it?

Regarding inefficient investment allocations, the plan sponsor is asking: What’s the long-term impact, are messages driving this behavior, and are there structural changes that can improve it?

Willis Towers Watson says, using this process, plan sponsors can develop tangible goals and scorecards, and track progress going forward, developing more effective governance and achieving retirement readiness.

«