DoL Provides Form 5500 Reporting Relief for 403(b) Plans

The U.S. Department of Labor (DoL) has provided transitional relief for administrators of 403(b) plans that make good faith efforts to transition for the 2009 plan year to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act's (ERISA) generally applicable annual reporting requirements.

The U.S. Department of Labor (DoL) has provided transitional relief for administrators of 403(b) plans that make good faith efforts to transition for the 2009 plan year to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act’s (ERISA) generally applicable annual reporting requirements.

In Field Assistance Bulletin 2009-02, the DoL said the relief is limited to the Form 5500 annual reporting requirements, including the requirement for large plans to include as part of their annual report the report of an independent qualified public accountant.

Specifically, FAB 2009-02 provides that the administrator of a 403(b) plan does not need to treat annuity contracts and custodial accounts as part of the employer’s Title I plan or as plan assets for purposes of ERISA’s annual reporting requirements provided that:

  • the contract or account was issued to a current or former employee before January 1, 2009;
  • the employer ceased to have any obligation to make contributions (including employee salary reduction contributions), and in fact ceased making contributions to the contract or account before January 1, 2009;
  • all of the rights and benefits under the contract or account are legally enforceable against the insurer or custodian by the individual owner of the contract or account without any involvement by the employer; and
  • the individual owner of the contract is fully vested in the contract or account.

In addition, the DoL said current or former employees with only contracts or accounts that are excludable from the plan’s Form 5500 or Form 5500-SF under the above transition relief do not need to be counted as participants covered under the plan for Form 5500 annual reporting purposes. The DoL also will not reject a Form 5500 on the basis of a “qualified,” “adverse” or disclaimed opinion if the accountant expressly states that the sole reason for such an opinion was because such pre-2009 contracts were not covered by the audit or included in the plan’s financial statements.

The Labor Department said it generally finds unacceptable and rejects Form 5500 filings with adverse, qualified or disclaimer opinions, which the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) said its members may do in the case of 403(b) plan filings.

Following passage of new 403(b) regulations in July 2007, the DoL separately published Form 5500 revisions and related final regulations generally effective for plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2009. Some plan administrators expressed concern that the historical treatment of 403(b) plans as a collection of individual contracts with respect to which employees could engage in a range of actions without the consent or involvement of an employer or plan administrator could make it costly, and in some cases impossible, to identify and obtain financial information about certain pre-2009 contracts and custodial accounts to which the employer is no longer making employer contributions or forwarding employee salary reduction contributions.

The FAB said employers and investment providers have noted in particular that in many cases they would not be able to obtain the information necessary to include these contracts and accounts in the expanded Form 5500 required for 403(b) plans beginning with the 2009 plan year. Moreover, even in cases where some annual reporting with respect to the contracts would be possible, the compliance efforts involved would be substantial and expensive.

FAB 2009-02 is located here.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

Securities Class Actions Plummet Through Mid-2009

The number of federal securities class action cases filed in the first six months of 2009 dropped by 22.3% over a year earlier, according to the latest data in an annual survey of the topic.

The number of federal securities class action cases filed in the first six months of 2009 dropped by 22.3% over a year earlier, according to the latest data in an annual survey of the topic.

A news release about Securities Class Action Filings—2009: Mid-Year Assessment said the study found 87 such cases filed between January and June 2009, compared to 112 for the same period in 2008. Only 35 filings were observed in the second quarter, the lowest quarterly total since the first quarter of 2007. The study, co-sponsored by the Stanford Law School Securities Class Action Clearinghouse and Cornerstone Research, said that if the filing rate for the first half of the year continues, then 174 securities class actions will be filed this year, a 22.3% decrease from 2008 and an 11.7% decrease from the annual average for the 12 year period ending December 2008.

About half of the filings so far in 2009 were driven by the credit crisis, with 42 filings in the first half of the year containing allegations related to the credit crisis. There were 15 filings related to Ponzi schemes thus far in 2009. The majority of these lawsuits, 11 filings, were on behalf of investors in Madoff funds, with most suits targeting so-called feeder funds, hedge funds, and other financial intermediaries that invested their clients’ money with Madoff.

“Securities litigation activity continues to be driven by claims against financial services firms, but all the large firms in the industry have already been sued,” Joseph Grundfest, director of the Stanford Law School Securities Class Action Clearinghouse, said in a statement. “Plaintiffs are therefore filing claims against the smaller number of smaller financial services firms yet to be sued.”

According to the announcement, financial services firms are defendants in 66.7% of the suits, an increase over the 50% share of all filings in 2008.

So far in 2009, 18 lawsuits have been filed against foreign-domiciled firms, representing 20.7% of the total. Filings against foreign firms are concentrated in the financial sector, as 41.9% of the filings in 2008 and 77.7% of the filings in the first half of 2009 were against financial firms.

According to the study, Disclosure Dollar Losses (DDL) totaled only $48 billion, well below the semi-annual average of $69 billion. Two-thirds of these losses are generated by two mega-DDL cases with DDLs in excess of $5 billion each.

Maximum Dollar Losses (MDL), however, totaled $429 billion, a 22.2% increase from the second half of 2008 and 20.5% above the semi-annual average. The median MDL was also 80.3% higher than the semi-annual average. There were seven mega MDL filings—lawsuits with an MDL of $10 billion or more—that accounted for $376 billion of MDL in the first half of 2009 and represent 87.6% of MDL in the first half of 2009, the largest share in the prior 12 years.

The dramatic decline in the number of class action filings is happening at the same time as a 43.7% decline from the fourth quarter of 2008 to the second quarter of 2009 in stock market volatility as measured by the Chicago Board Options Exchange Volatility Index (VIX).

The full report is available here.

«