DoL Issues New Fee Disclosure Rules

After months of anticipation, the Department of Labor (DoL) has released its interim final rule on fee disclosure.

 

According to the document released this morning by the Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA), the interim final rule is effective on July 16, 2011.  However, EBSA is encouraging comments on the interim final rule during a 45-day comment period following publication of the rule.

According to EBSA, the final regulation differs from the proposal in a number of significant respects:

First, unlike the proposal, the final rule does not require a formal written contract or arrangement delineating the disclosure obligations, even though the disclosures must be made in writing. EBSA notes that the final rule focuses instead on the substance of the disclosure that must be provided.

Second, the final rule treats pension and welfare plans separately, with Paragraph (c)(1) of the rule published today providing disclosure requirements applicable to contracts or arrangements with pension plans, including defined contribution programs (the rule notes that DoL reserves paragraph (c)(2) of the rule for future guidance on disclosure with respect to welfare plans).

Third, the final rule modifies the categories of service providers that must comply with the disclosure requirements, including fiduciaries, investment advisers, and recordkeepers or brokers who make investment alternatives available to a plan – noting that it also applies to “providers of other specified services who receive either “indirect compensation” (generally from sources other than the plan or plan sponsor) or certain types of payments from affiliates and subcontractors.”

The final rule includes in its definition of “covered service providers” fiduciaries to investment vehicles that hold plan assets and in which a covered plan has a direct equity investment. However, DoL notes that the definition makes clear that furnishing non-fiduciary services to such vehicles, or services to vehicles that do not hold plan assets, will not cause a person to be a covered service provider. In addition, the regulation requires fiduciaries to plan asset investment vehicles in which plans make direct equity investments, as well as parties that offer designated investment alternatives to a participant-directed individual account plan as part of a platform, to furnish investment-related compensation information.Fourth, the final rule, unlike the proposal, does not contain specific narrative conflict of interest disclosure provisions, but rather relies on full disclosure of the circumstances under which the covered service provider will be receiving compensation from parties other than the plan (or plan sponsor), the identification of such parties, and the compensation that is expected to be received.  DoL says it is “persuaded that plan fiduciaries will be in a better position to assess potential conflicts of interest by reviewing these specific parties and the actual or expected compensation to be received from such parties.”

Fifth, the final rule includes a new provision requiring that certain providers of multiple services disclose separately the cost to the covered plan of recordkeeping services.

Sixth, the final rule specifically addresses the application of the requirements of the regulation to section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Lastly, the exemptive relief for plan sponsors or other responsible plan fiduciaries, originally proposed as a separate exemption, is now incorporated into the final rule “for ease of reference and consideration by interested parties.”

The text of the interim final rule is available at http://www.ofr.gov/OFRUpload/OFRData/2010-16768_PI.pdf  
 To facilitate the receipt and processing of comments, EBSA encourages interested persons to submit their comments electronically to e-ORI@dol.gov, or by using the Federal eRulemaking portal http://www.regulations.gov (following instructions for submission of comments). EBSA notes that persons submitting comments electronically are encouraged not to submit paper copies. Persons interested in submitting comments on paper should send or deliver their comments (preferably three copies) to: Office of Regulations and Interpretations, Employee Benefits Security Administration, Room N-5655, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20210, Attention: 408(b)(2) Interim Final Rule.

All comments will be available to the public, without charge, online at http://www.regulations.gov and http://www.dol.gov/ebsa, and at the Public Disclosure Room, Employee Benefits Security Administration.

 

Strategic Insight Sees More Growth for Bond and Alternative Investments

U.S. investors put $176 billion into stock and bond mutual funds (excluding ETFs) in the first half of 2010, according to Strategic Insight (SI), an Asset International company. 

Inflows to bond mutual funds totaled $138 billion. First-half 2010 inflows were led by taxable bond funds (net inflows of $120 billion). Many of those flows went to short- and intermediate-term corporate bond funds, as they drew investors fleeing near-zero yields in cash accounts (there is nearly $10 trillion still idling in cash in banks and money funds, SI said).   

“We expect continued sizeable inflows to bond funds, and not just as cash substitutes. More flexible bond funds appeal to investors in a defensive mood and their financial advisers, with such flexibility helpful to address some (but not all) of the concerns about rising interest rates in the coming years,” said Avi Nachmany, director of research at Strategic Insight, in a press release.  

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

International equity funds (1H net inflows of $34 billion) also saw healthy demand. Part of this growth was driven by emerging markets equity funds, which drew just over $10 billion in the first half – ahead of the $7 billion they drew in the first half of 2009. A limited appetite for risk restrained demand for U.S. equity funds in 1H 2010, resulting in net inflows of just $4 billion.  

Other strategies for which SI sees growth for the rest of 2010 include: 

  • Global tactical asset allocation funds – which have less constrained mandates and allow their portfolio managers to invest in multiple asset classes around the world. The emerging category of global tactical asset allocation funds drew $13 billion in net new flows in 1H 2010, versus $2 billion in net inflows in 2009’s first half. SI expects further growth and more launches of these more-flexible funds. 
  • “Alternative” mutual funds – those offering exposure to market-neutral strategies, long/short strategies, hard commodities, and other less-correlated asset classes. In the first half of 2010, alternative mutual funds (excluding ETFs) drew net inflows of $13 billion. Alternative mutual funds ended the first half with a record $116 billion in assets, up from $102 billion at the end of 2009. This growth results from more investors seeking “absolute returns” and downside protection in the wake of the financial crisis, as well as diversification of correlations to reduce volatility, according to SI.  
  • Actively managed mutual funds. During the first half, over $1 trillion of actively managed stock and bond funds were purchased by investors (SI’s estimates were based on ICI reported gross purchases, not net flows); more than 80% of funds purchased by investors and advisers are actively managed, with the balance put into passive products. 

 

(Cont...)

ETF Growth  

Strategic Insight announced that Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) took in $39 billion in net flows during the first half of 2010 - slightly ahead of the $35 billion in net inflows ETFs gathered in the first half of 2009.   

U.S. ETF assets (including ETNs) totaled $785 billion at the end of June, invested in a record 977 products.  

Net inflows to ETFs were led by gold ETFs, emerging markets ETFs, and short-term bond ETFs.   

More about Strategic Insight is at http://www.sionline.com. 

«