T. Rowe Price To Undergo Leadership Changes

T. Rowe Price, a global investment management organization, announces three significant changes to its leadership.

After 38 years with the firm, James A.C. Kennedy will announce his retirement at the company’s annual meeting on April 27, 2016. He will be stepping down from his role as chair of the firm’s management committee, as well as his position as CEO and president, which he has held for the past nine years.

“Having become CEO and president in January 2007, just months before the onset of the global financial crisis, his leadership helped T. Rowe Price emerge from the downturn in remarkably good shape,” says Brian C. Rogers, chairman and CIO. “Importantly, he has always put our clients’ interests first, while ensuring that we take care of our most important asset, our people.”

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

Kennedy earned his master’s degree in business administration from the Stanford Graduate School of Business before joining T. Rowe Price in 1978.

“I am particularly proud of our efforts over the years to maintain and grow the strength of our investment divisions, to continue delivering strong investment performance for our clients and to broaden our diverse talent base across the organization,” Kennedy comments.

Taking the reins as president, chief executive and chair of the management committee will be William J. Stromberg. He currently serves as head of global equity and global equity research, and member of the firm’s management committee. He will step into his new role on January 1.

“Throughout his 28-year career with the firm, he has consistently demonstrated his abilities as a talented investor, principled decision-maker and highly effective leader,” adds Rogers says.

Stromberg joined the company in 1987 after receiving a master’s degree in business administration from the Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth. He first served as an equity analyst before being named to more advanced positions within the firm’s equity business.

Additionally, the firm said Eric L. Veiel, director of equity research in North America and member of the U.S. equity steering committee, will become head of U.S. equity and chair of the U.S. equity steering committee as of January 1. He will join Stromberg on the management committee.

“With broad experience as an equity analyst, a portfolio manager and a director of equity research, Eric has developed the perspective and leadership skills required to thrive as head of U.S. equity,” Stromberg says. “He has played an increasingly influential role in guiding our equity management process, which has prepared him well to take on his new responsibilities.”

Veiel has16 years of investment experience, 10 of which were spent with T. Rowe Price. He previously worked with a range of financial services companies and holds a master’s degree in business administration from the John M. Olin Business School at.Washington University.

Based in Baltimore, T. Rowe Price reports $772.7 billion in assets under management as of March 31, and is a provider of mutual funds, subadvisory services and separate account management, as well as investment planning and guidance tools.

Plan Sponsors Eye Company Stock with Care

The Supreme Court’s decision on employee stock ownership plans will likely impact clients offering, or thinking about offering, employer stock as an investment option.

Last year’s unanimous Supreme Court decision in Fifth Third Bancorp v. Dudenhoeffer held that fiduciaries of employee stock ownership plans (ESOPs) are subject to the same duty of prudence that applies to fiduciaries in general per Section 1104(a)(1)(B) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), except that they need not diversify the fund’s assets, per Section 1104(a)(2). 

According to Towers Watson’s recent survey of employers with company stock in their defined contribution (DC) plans, new “stock drop” complaints are still being filed, and several courts have refused to dismiss these suits in light of the Dudenhoeffer decision. In March, for example, an investigation was launched into possible ERISA violations by a multinational pharmaceutical company.

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

Many employers are reviewing the status of company stock as an investment option in their DC plans, Towers Watson says. A majority of companies that responded to the survey (76%) have reviewed or plan to review their procedures for monitoring company stock, investment policy statements and plan documents. More than one-third (38%) already have retained or are considering retaining a third party as an independent fiduciary. Slightly more than one-fourth (26%) have initiated or are considering the elimination of company stock.

The ruling is consistent with ERISA’s general approach to evaluating fiduciary decisions based on whether a fiduciary has followed a prudent process, Towers Watson notes. The benefits consulting firm outlines a prudent process as one that usually includes documenting that a plan’s fiduciaries have sought appropriate information, asked pertinent questions and accessed expert opinions when necessary. Towers Watson believes fiduciary committees will benefit from a post-Dudenhoeffer review of their decision to offer company stock as a DC plan investment option.

As a starting point, Towers Watson recommends asking two key questions:

  • Should the plan sponsor maintain company stock as an investment option? If so, should it modify any risk management approaches?
  • If the plan sponsor determines that keeping company stock is no longer an appropriate investment option, how should it best manage elimination of the investment?

The answers to these questions will vary according to the structure of a given ESOP, and the plan sponsor’s underlying goals/reasons for offering an ESOP component to the retirement package. 

Other findings from the report:

  • 74% of companies surveyed have reviewed or plan to review their investment policy statement;
  • 62% have reviewed or plan to review their plan document; and
  • 41% of those that have completed their review of the investment policy statement have revised or plan to revise their statement. 

«