Guide to Implementing NQDC Plan Available

A new guide to implementing nonqualified deferred compensation (NQDC) plans is available.

Michael G. Goldstein, in conjunction with the American Bar Association, released the second edition of “Taxation and Funding of Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation: A Complete Guide to Design and Implementation.” The new book includes all of the latest information and procedures needed to successfully plan and implement these programs. It is designed to be a guide for executive deferred compensation professionals.  

“This book is the culmination of herculean efforts by my co-author, Marla Aspinwall of Loeb & Loeb, as well as chapter contributors Lawrence Venick, also of Loeb & Loeb, and Lee Nunn of Aon Executive Benefits,” said Goldstein, president and CEO for Summit Alliance Executive Benefits LLC. “Since its first publication in 1998, there has been a significant sea change in the nonqualified plan arena. This complete revision now becomes the definitive text on the subject addressing, in a straightforward and practical way, how one can provide this exceedingly important benefit without violating the law and regulations governing the concept.”  

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

The book is available for $129.95 at www.apps.americanbar.org/abastore/. Look up key words “nonqualified deferred compensation.”

DOL Issues Clarification to Participant Fee Disclosure Guidance

The U.S. Department of Labor's Employee Benefits Security Administration issued Field Assistance Bulletin (FAB) No. 2012-02R, which supersedes Field Assistance Bulletin No. 2012-02.

On May 7, the Department issued Field Assistance Bulletin No. 2012-02, which provides guidance to its field enforcement personnel in question and answer format on the obligations of plan administrators under a final regulation to improve transparency of fees and expenses to workers with 401(k)–type retirement plans (see “DOL Issues Additional Guidance for Participant Fee Disclosures”). Some plan sponsors and service providers asked questions about statements in Question 30 regarding brokerage windows and other arrangements that enable plan participants and beneficiaries to select investments beyond those designated by the plan (see “DOL’s Answer in Fee Disclosure Guidance ‘Surprising’”).   

The Department decided to issue Field Assistance Bulletin No. 2012-02R to further clarify its position and to give interested parties more time to engage in discussions with the Department on practical and cost effective ways to ensure participants and beneficiaries receive all the fiduciary protections afforded to them under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) when they use brokerage windows and other similar arrangements, including, if appropriate, through amendment of relevant regulatory provisions. 
 

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

 

The new FAB modifies and replaces Q&A 30 with a new Q&A 39, which says:  

Q39: A plan offers an investment platform that includes a brokerage window, self-directed brokerage account, or similar plan arrangement. The fiduciary did not designate any of the funds on the platform or available through the brokerage window, self-directed brokerage account, or similar plan arrangement as "designated investment alternatives" under the plan. Is the platform or the brokerage window, self-directed brokerage account, or similar plan arrangement a designated investment alternative for purposes of the regulation?  

A39. No. Whether an investment alternative is a "designated investment alternative" (DIA) for purposes of the regulation depends on whether it is specifically identified as available under the plan. The regulation does not require that a plan have a particular number of DIAs, and nothing in this Bulletin prohibits the use of a platform or a brokerage window, self-directed brokerage account, or similar plan arrangement in an individual account plan. The Bulletin also does not change the 404(c) regulation or the requirements for relief from fiduciary liability under section 404(c) of ERISA or address the application of ERISA's general fiduciary requirements to SEPs or SIMPLE IRA plans. Nonetheless, in the case of a 401(k) or other individual account plan covered under the regulation, a plan fiduciary's failure to designate investment alternatives, for example, to avoid investment disclosures under the regulation, raises questions under ERISA section 404(a)'s general statutory fiduciary duties of prudence and loyalty. Also, fiduciaries of such plans with platforms or brokerage windows, self-directed brokerage accounts, or similar plan arrangements that enable participants and beneficiaries to select investments beyond those designated by the plan are still bound by ERISA section 404(a)'s statutory duties of prudence and loyalty to participants and beneficiaries who use the platform or the brokerage window, self-directed brokerage account, or similar plan arrangement, including taking into account the nature and quality of services provided in connection with the platform or the brokerage window, self-directed brokerage account, or similar plan arrangement.  

The Department understands plan fiduciaries and service providers may have questions regarding the situations in which fiduciaries may have duties under ERISA's general fiduciary standards apart from those in the regulation. The Department intends to engage in discussions with interested parties to help determine how best to assure compliance with these duties in a practical and cost effective manner, including, if appropriate, through amendments of relevant regulatory provisions. 

FAB 2012-02R is at http://www.dol.gov/ebsa/regs/fab2012-2R.html.  
 

 

«