Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.
Compliance December 28, 2012
Court to Hear Case About Judges’ Retirement Age
The federal court system will hear a case challenging Pennsylvania’s
mandatory retirement age for judges.
Reported by Jay Polansky
Judge Gerald R. Solomon and Judge Arthur Tilson claim the provision – which sets the retirement age at 70 – violates their equal protection and due-process rights under the U.S. Constitution, the Herald-Standard reports.
Solomon, who is 70 years old, is opting to continue working as a senior judge, but he will not receive benefits like full-time judges.
The mandatory retirement age of judges varies throughout the United States. In November, a group of Pennsylvania judges also filed a lawsuit against the state regarding a mandatory retirement provision of state law (see “Pa. Judges Sue to Stop Mandatory Retirement”). That suit has also been transferred to federal court.
You Might Also Like:
Lawsuit Against Siemens Over Forfeiture Use Dismissed
The complaint, filed last year, alleged Siemens violated ERISA by using forfeitures “in its own interest,” rather than in the...
Complaint Alleges ERISA Breaches in Siemens Energy 401(k) Plan
According to the complaint, Siemens Energy retained in its plan underperforming investment options, including its proprietary stable value fund that delivered...
Plan Participants Allege Franklin Templeton Proprietary Investments Cost Plan Millions
The complaint alleges Franklin Templeton violated ERISA by: 1) breaching its fiduciary duties of loyalty and prudence; and 2) failing...