Specifically, four new Investment Discipline Indexes will be
added to Russell’s lineup, each reflecting a particular approach to small cap
security selection commonly practiced by professional money managers.They include the Russell U.S. Small Cap
Aggressive Growth Index, Russell U.S. Small Cap Consistent Growth Index,
Russell U.S. Small Cap Low P/E Index, and Russell U.S. Small Cap Contrarian
Index.
“We are very excited to expand our line of investment
discipline indexes into the small cap arena, where we believe our clients can
particularly benefit from high quality tools.These indexes draw from Russell’s strength in researching professional
money managers and our pioneering history in indexing, particularly in small cap
stocks,” said Rolf Agather, Managing Director of index research and innovation
at Russell Investments.“Over time,
Russell analysts have identified common characteristics and preferences among
investors seeking attractive investment opportunities across capitalizations.Our new small cap investment discipline
indexes provide additional tools for small-cap investors to gain exposure to
these strategies.”
The ETF Investor Study also found that eight in ten investors
who currently own ETFs say they will invest more into them over the next two
years.
The survey consisted of more than 1,000 individual investors
with at least $25,000 in investable assets and familiarity with ETFs. The study
was designed to gauge individual investors’ attitudes toward and understanding
of ETFs, and how or if they would use them as part of their investment
portfolios. Nearly two-thirds of all respondents to the survey own ETFs; the
other third plan to invest in an ETF in the next two years.
The study shows investors’ appetite for ETFs is rising in
several ways: in addition to the 44% who plan to invest more, just two percent
say they will decrease their ETF investments. According to the study, the increased
interest is driven in part by a distinct set of benefits unique to the product.
ETF owners say the biggest benefit of ETFs is that they trade like stocks,
while those considering them cite diversification as the top benefit.
But the study also offers insights on the gaps that still
exist in investors’ knowledge about ETFs. Forty-six percent of investors
surveyed call themselves ETF “novices,” and one-fourth of all respondents
indicate that they do not understand their costs or how to best use them.
Thirty-one percent of respondents say they don’t know how to use ETFs across asset
classes, and more than 25% know nothing about the difference between actively
managed and index-based ETFs.
“Individual investors are attracted to the efficiency and
flexibility of ETFs, but many do not have a solid grasp on how they work,” said
Beth Flynn, vice president of ETF Platform Management at Charles Schwab. “As
more flavors of ETFs come to market, it is clear that the emphasis on education
will be more important than ever.”
Half of ETF owners surveyed say they use these products to
access specific sectors or markets, and 44% use them to invest in core asset
allocation strategies. Sector ETFs were cited as the type most frequently
evaluated for purchase, followed closely by equity and international ETFs.
Thirty-four percent of respondents also report interest in commodity ETFs, and
more than one in four (26%) say they are considering fixed income funds for
their next ETF purchase.
The survey finds that ETFs comprise, on average, almost 20% of
ETF investors’ portfolios, and individual funds are held by investors for an
average of 1.5 years.
The study reports that the cost of an ETF is the primary
factor that matters to investors when choosing an ETF, followed by a fund’s
performance history and the reputation of the ETF sponsor. When asked which
specific components of cost are most important, respondents named the fund’s
expense ratio first, followed by trade commission. In fact, 43% of investors
say that the ability to trade a fund commission-free is important but not the
only factor to consider when choosing an ETF. Premium and discount pricing, and
a fund’s bid/ask spread, ranked third and fourth respectively.