Are Benefits of Investing in Alternatives Overstated?

A report from the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College suggests that for corporate pension plans, the potential diversification benefits from investing in alternative investments may be overstated.

Researcher Divya Anantharaman examined the determinants and consequences of corporate pension plan investments in hedge funds and private equity and found plans with alternative investments earn higher returns in the pre-crisis period, but also have a worse performance during times of crisis. The report said “overall, there seems to be very little evidence that plans with allocations to alternative assets weathered the market crisis better than their peers who invested only in ‘traditional’ stocks and bonds. If anything, the evidence indicates that they performed slightly worse.”  

Anantharaman found highly leveraged firms with low market-to-book ratios and volatile earnings performance are more likely to invest in alternative assets, indicating that financially constrained firms choose alternative investments to increase asset returns and minimize pension contributions. In addition, the research found a nonlinear relationship between plan funding status and alternative investing – very underfunded and well-funded plans are less likely to make alternative investments compared to moderately underfunded plans, suggesting that such plan sponsors may avoid these investments to minimize contribution volatility.  

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

The report can be downloaded here.  

Accumulation Remains the Focal Point of Retirement Industry

Based on a survey with financial services executives, Aite Group asserts that the retirement income industry is still in its infancy, with the shift from accumulation to decumulation evolving slowly.

The report from Aite Group assesses the state of the U.S. retirement income marketplace, which includes retail-distribution financial advisers, asset managers, insurance firms, online brokerages, and banks. The survey included 22 senior financial services executives.

The financial services professionals were asked, “Where is the retirement income industry today in terms of achieving optimal retirement income practices?”  More than half of respondents (58%) said the industry as a whole is still either fully in or somewhat in the accumulation phase. Thirty-seven percent see the industry as being between accumulation and decumulation, 5% see the industry as being somewhat in decumulation and none see decumulation as fully realized.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

Because of these results, Aite Group concluded that the retirement income industry is still in its infancy, with the shift from accumulation to decumulation evolving slowly. Investment outcomes and lessons from 2008 continue to weigh heavily on investors’ minds, and many consumers were unable to save adequately, according to Aite Group. As a result, retirement income firms across various silos—banks, broker/dealers, independent advisers, registered investment advisers (RIAs), insurance firms, asset managers and defined contribution recordkeepers—are grappling with the question of how to construct appropriate and suitable retirement income plans for clients across various wealth bands.

“The shift from wealth accumulation to decumulation is where financial advisers and distribution firms must transform their practice-management skills,” says Greg Cherry, senior analyst with Aite Group and author of the report. “The accumulation practices of the past are simply not sustainable as consumers demand less market risk and an increased focus on one day replacing their paychecks with retirement paychecks.”

The 33-page report is available to clients of Aite Group’s Wealth Management service.

«