2024 Global Asset Management AUM Grows to $128T

Seventy percent of asset manager revenue last year was driven by market performance, according to research from the Boston Consulting Group.

Global assets under management by firms in the asset management industry grew by 12% in 2024 to reach $128 trillion, according to the Boston Consulting Group’s 2025 global asset management report, “From Recovery to Reinvention.”

Market performance was a key driver of growth in 2024, contributing to 70% of the industry $58 billion in revenue growth. Net inflows accounted for 30% of global revenues, as managers shifted to offering lower-priced products and were affected by fee compression. 

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

Investors also continued to shift away from actively managed funds to passive ones. In 2024, active strategies experienced $100 billion in outflows, while passive funds had $1.6 trillion in inflows. 

One of the forces reshaping the industry, BCG noted, is the consolidation of firms, as an increasing number of asset managers are turning to mergers and acquisitions to expand their geographical footprints and product offerings.

The last few years has produced many high-profile acquisitions, such as BlackRock’s expansion into alternative investments with its 2024 acquisitions of private credit manager HPS Investment Partners ($148 billion AUM) and infrastructure investor Global Infrastructure Partners ($170 billion AUM).

According to BCG, for firms with fewer than $300 billion in AUM, adding AUM reduces costs as a percentage of AUM. At the $500 billion mark, rising operational challenges and complexity emerge as these firms expand to new asset classes and client segments.

“Because no one-size-fits-all approach is available, many asset managers will need to consider enhancing their scale and scope through strategic partnerships or M&A to stay relevant,” the report stated. “The consolidation we are seeing tends to revolve around strategies for broadening product offerings, expanding global presence, building technology capabilities, securing more permanent capital, and increasing proximity to clients.”

Fiduciary Best Practices for Healthcare Plans

During a recent PLANSPONSOR webinar, experts discussed maintaining fiduciary oversight over health plans, especially the importance of updating plan documents, creating committees and monitoring vendors.

Just as fiduciaries must uphold their duties when managing their retirement plans, the same is true for health care plans, which require thorough documentation, requests for proposals, committee-member training and more.

When it comes to creating a “fiduciary process action plan,” Rory Kane Akers, vice president and a senior ERISA compliance attorney at Lockton Companies, said at last week’s PLANSPONSOR Roadmap livestream on health plan fiduciary duties that Step 1 is understanding who the plan fiduciaries are.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

“If you were to walk into a board meeting or a C-suite executive meeting and ask, ‘Who are the plan fiduciaries?’ I think everybody would sit on their hands,” Akers said. “The key here is to figure out who makes plan decisions to administer the plan appropriately.”

Akers said the plan document might name the plan sponsor or employer as the fiduciary, but it may not specifically name the vice president of human resources or the chief financial officer, for example. She said the company needs to identify the people in charge of hiring service providers and responsible for forwarding employee contributions, as the Employee Retirement Income Secure Act states that a fiduciary is anyone who exercises discretion with regard to the management and administration of the plan.

Jamie Greenleaf, co-founder of Fiduciary In a Box, said in recent litigation regarding health care plans, such as cases involving Johnson & Johnson and JPMorganChase, the lawsuits name the individual HR managers and board members. Greenleaf added that many plan sponsors have not spent enough time reviewing their plan documents and need to update documents to reflect some changes they have made to the design of the health benefits they offer.

“I think the easiest and biggest mistake that we traditionally see from most plan sponsors is they don’t even know where their plan document is, let alone if it’s in accordance with [changes they’ve made to the plan],” Greenleaf said.

Akers said she has found that plan documents also tend to be vague when it comes to health benefit plan eligibility.

“A lot of plan sponsors will implement standard plan designs for their [third-party administrator], and sometimes if you look at that document, there’s no clear criteria as to eligibility,” Akers said. “If you don’t have clear eligibility standards, the question when someone comes to you and says, ‘I think I should have benefits,’ becomes an even bigger question.”

Greenleaf added that some practical things a fiduciary should implement to ensure their health plan is up to fiduciary standards include:

  1. Establishing a governance committee;
  2. Reviewing and revising plan documents (as necessary);
  3. Identifying routine processes; and
  4. Consistently reviewing plan vendor performance and fees.

The governance committee should hold regular meetings to discuss plan operations, and it should keep detailed minutes of discussion points and decisions to illustrate proof of prudent oversight.

In terms of reviewing vendor performance, Akers said it is important to compare the value of services against others in the market and confirm that the TPA is carrying out any Consolidated Appropriations Act responsibilities that it accepted in writing.

“What we are starting to see is some of these vendor partners will, in contract terms, say they are fiduciaries with certain aspects of the plan,” Akers said. “I do think that the litigation [and] transparency rules have started a really good conversation, holding some of those vendors’ feet to the fire to say, ‘Are you fiduciaries?’ And I think it’s giving employers more willingness to push them to clearly put in their contracts that they are fiduciaries, to some extent.”

In September 2024, the ERISA Industry Committee called on Congress in an issue brief to deem pharmacy benefit managers as fiduciaries under ERISA, as they engage in practices that have the potential to raise costs for employees enrolled in employer-sponsored health plans.

A full recording of the webinar can be viewed here.

«