A federal district court judge only moved forward certain claims of breaches of fiduciary duty of prudence under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA).
The complaint suggests the companies engaged in “Tammany-like” collusion to steer assets into more favorable investments; both providers have issued strong denials and requests for summary judgement.
The plaintiff alleges that the contract’s cancellation was not made with his and the other beneficiaries’ interests in mind, but rather to improve the parent/subsidiary companies’ financial positions...
“The tax rules have always been designed to tie the interests of the employer and the employee together," one former EBSA official says. “So if you mess up...
The complaint suggests plan officials ceded discretion to a provider to add any mutual fund it wished, “regardless of whether the funds were duplicative of other options, had...
Members of the "ACT" committee are in a unique position to provide observations about current or proposed IRS policies, programs and procedures, and suggest improvements through a yearly...
Participants successfully challenged Foot Locker’s determination of benefit accruals after the conversion of a traditional pension plan into a cash balance arrangement.
After a trip through the 9th Circuit and the U.S. Supreme Court, the case of Tibble vs. Edison has received another ruling in the district court where it...
Experts with the American Academy of Actuaries argue the Annual Funding Notice process required of pension plans under ERISA Section 101(f) is “an example of a good idea...