The program combines the
accessibility of the Web, phone and paper with personalized guidance for
employees making multiple benefit enrollment decisions. Calculators, benefit explanations and rules of thumb help ensure employees
better understand their benefit choices and the enrollment process.
Complete end-to-end online enrollment experience, including
real-time Statement of Health submission and beneficiary
designation;
New decision advice and guidance provided by Amy
Helper, an online, interactive avatar to help employees decide what
benefit options are best for them and their families;
A dedicated enrollment expert to help build an employee
communications campaign;
Benefits education tools, calculators and tips for
employees—as well as dedicated call center support; and
Real-time reporting capabilities through an online
administrator view, assisting sponsors with evaluating participation
levels and identifying gaps.
Although multi-employer plans
experienced generally strong market performance in late 2009 and 2010, overall
investment performance was relatively poor in 2011 because of continued market
volatility. Consequently, the investment losses of 2008 and early 2009, in
conjunction with the lackluster 2011 investment results, had an impact on most
plans.
The proportion of calendar-year
multi-employer pension plans in the green zone declined by four percentage
points between January 1, 2011, and January 1, 2012, from
66% to 62%. The survey shows that the average Pension Protection Act of 2006
(PPA’06) funded percentage for those plans decreased by three percentage points
over that period, from 89% to 86%. Before the market downturn that began in
late 2008, more than three-quarters of calendar-year plans (83%) were in the
green zone and the average funded percentage was 97%.
In the previous year’s survey, only 3% of the plans that
were certified as green were projected to migrate into the yellow or red zone.
Unfortunately, the plans’ projected zone status has deteriorated somewhat since
then. Data from this year’s survey indicates that, over the next few years, 13%
of the plans that were certified as green are projected to migrate into the
yellow or red zone.
(Cont...)
Segal recommends that trustees work
with their professional advisers to develop strategies to further improve the
funded position of plans, including through:
Modeling the effect of plan design and/or contribution
rate changes on projected zone status, or other measures;
Conducting cash-flow projections to consider the plan’s
future annual liquidity requirements; and
Having asset-liability projections performed to assess
the sensitivity of the plan’s future funding status to future investment
return scenarios.
Boards of trustees may want to
consider some actions that Segal suggests, including:
Evaluating their plan’s current and projected financial
and actuarial positions;
Reviewing current investment guidelines, objectives
and/or asset allocation;
For plans that have just entered the yellow or red
zone, preparing to formulate Funding Improvement or Rehabilitation Plans,
as required by PPA’06;
For plans already in the yellow or red zone, review and
evaluate the viability of Funding Improvement or Rehabilitation
Plans;
Reviewing the plan’s procedures for determining
withdrawn employers, the methodology for calculating and assessing
withdrawal liability, and for complying with requests from employers;
and
Providing information to participants and all
interested parties regarding the funded status of the plan to meet PPA’06
requirements and additional information beyond what PPA’06 requires.