LPL Expands in RIA, Hybrid Markets

LPL Financial Corporation is expanding its product and service offering with introduction of an integrated adviser solution platform, supporting independent registered investment advisers (RIA) and hybrid (dually registered) advisers.

The platform, expected to roll out in late 2008, enables advisers to address all of their clients’ commission and fee-based needs while also giving them flexibility to grow their independent RIA offering across any business model, according to the firm.

LPL Financial will provide RIA and hybrid advisers with access to a broad range of investment services and products, dedicated and experienced service staff, and what the firm calls best-in-breed technology. The firm will also be offering prospective financial advisers transition services to ensure a smooth on-boarding process.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

The company has appointed industry veteran, Gary Gallagher, to Executive Vice President, Head of RIA Services. Gallagher served as Senior Vice President of Fidelity Institutional Wealth Services at Fidelity Investments, where he launched UMA, alternative investments, separate account and trust platforms for the benefit of intermediaries and investment advisers. Based in Boston, Gallagher will report to Esther Stearns, President and COO, and is responsible for building out the RIA and Hybrid business at LPL Financial.

“We view our continued expansion into the RIA and hybrid markets as a key growth driver for the LPL Financial business, and especially our financial advisers’ businesses in 2008 and beyond,” said LPL Financial CEO, Mark Casady, in a press release. “With this new offering, LPL Financial is redefining the idea of independent advice. This further demonstrates our commitment to provide independent advisers with a conflict-free and unbiased approach to allow them to grow their business on their terms.”

IMHO: Storm Surge

Over the past several weeks, I’ve received a dozen different inquiries from providers and advisers, all wanting to know if we’re seeing any pickup in provider changes.

Now, aside from the frequency and consistency of the inquiries, they also share two interesting aspects. The first is that—to a person—the inquirers say that, while they are still enjoying a good deal of activity/interest, they have heard that things are slowing down.

What I’ve not been able to figure out, of course, is if they are just nervous that their string of good luck is getting ready to run out, or if they are feeling really confident about their business prowess and are looking for some independent affirmation of same.

Truth be told, I’ve not seen anything to suggest a noteworthy uptick in the number of provider changes—other than the uptick in volume that frequently is associated with changes at the providers themselves (see “Exit Signs’). It’s summer, after all, and if it isn’t quite the activity doldrums that it was once upon a time, the reality is that provider changes are generally committee decisions, committees are made up of people, and people—certainly those with kids—still tend to be out of the office for extended periods of time in the summer. And those absences tend to slow, if not freeze, committee actions.

Change = Work?

Will there be more change this year than in years past? Frankly, I doubt it. “Change” may now be the mantra of the 2008 presidential election, but IMHO, for most plan sponsors, change equals work. It’s work to go through a search process, after all (even if a consultant/adviser does most of the legwork), and, some have reminded us in the current election cycle, change is not necessarily for the good. There are risks: that the changeover won’t go smoothly, that the new provider will turn out to be no better—or even that, in ways as yet unanticipated, they will be worse.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

Furthermore, even the most seamless of transitions imposes change—not only on plan sponsors, but on plan participants. New Web sites, new toll-free call in numbers, different statements, new procedures for handling loans and withdrawals—and the potential for a reinvigorated investment menu—all serve to “inflict” change on plan participants, as well as the plan sponsor.

That’s why, in my experience, plan sponsors approach change with caution (some might term it “prudence”). And most—though they are always interested in improving services and in reducing fees—reasonably find the tasks and uncertainties attendant with a provider change sufficiently daunting to keep them firmly planted (change can be forced on them, of course, by provider exits or by service “missteps”).

However, you can sense a sea change just over the horizon as a new series of fee disclosure initiatives takes hold, both at the plan and participant level. It will take time for those to emerge, of course—even longer for plan fiduciaries to absorb and respond. But respond they will, IMHO, and in short order, the question will go from “what am I paying” to “why am I paying what I am paying?”

It’s a change that will catch some unawares, and, with luck, it’s a change that will drive off the unprepared and uncommitted— those who think they can simply “ride out” the storm. It’s a change that is coming—whether you believe in it, or not.

«