A Reuters news report said that the suit charges managers at the firm of having few limits on their ability to assign responsibilities as they see fit which has produced “unchecked gender bias.” As a result, only 14% of partners are women, 17% of manager directors, and 29% of vice presidents.
“Goldman Sachs has intentionally implemented these companywide policies and practices in order to pay their male employees more money than their female counterparts, and to promote them more frequently,” the suit declared.
The suit requests class action status to represent women who have worked at the firm in the last six years as managing directors, vice presidents, and associates.
According to the news report, Lisa Parisi alleged she was significantly underpaid compared with male colleagues, including a 60% drop from 2005 to 2007, and had investments taken away from her despite her skill in stock picking. Cristina Chen-Oster alleged she was repeatedly shunted to lower-paying and lower-priority jobs, and had her accounts taken away after she returned from a maternity leave.
Chen-Oster also said that after a dinner at a topless bar to celebrate a colleague’s promotion, an event that all employees in her group were encouraged to attend, a male colleague attempted a sexual act with her. She also said she received a sexually charged e-mail from a male colleague that made fun of her Chinese heritage.
According to Reuters, Chen-Oster resigned from Goldman after eight years in 2005, while Parisi’s and Shanna Orlich’s jobs were terminated in 2008 after they had worked there since 2001 and 2006, respectively.
Goldman denied the allegations in comments to Reuters. “This suit is without merit,” spokesman Lucas van Praag said in an e-mail. “People are critical to our business, and we make extraordinary efforts to recruit, develop, and retain outstanding women professionals.”