Vantage Benefits Administrators Owners Indicted for Stealing From Retirement Plans

If convicted on all counts, they face up to 81 years in federal prison.

A federal grand jury indicted a Red Oak, Texas, couple who allegedly embezzled $14.5 million from retirement plans they managed, U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Texas Erin Nealy Cox announced.

Jeffrey Richie, 53, and Wendy Richie, 58, co-owners of Vantage Benefits Administrators, were charged with conspiracy, theft from an employee benefit plan, wire fraud and aggravated identify theft.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

According to the indictment, Vantage served as third party administrator for dozens of retirement funds, including several 401(k)s. With her husband’s knowledge, Ms. Richie—posing as various beneficiaries—allegedly submitted fraudulent distribution requests to the retirement fund custodian, Matrix Trust Co.

Instead of depositing the money into beneficiaries’ accounts, however, she transferred it into Vantage’s operating account. The couple allegedly used those funds to pay Vantage payroll and other operating expenses, as well as personal expenses, including mortgage and escrow payments, farming equipment and home décor.

The Richies misappropriated funds from at least 1,000 plan participants in at least 20 employers’ retirement plans, prosecutors say. A lawsuit filed by MBA Engineering on behalf of its 401(k) and cash balance plans also accuses Vantage Benefits, MBA’s TPA and recordkeeper, of stealing money from approximately 20 other retirement plans.

The couple did not only allegedly steal money from 401(k) plans. Two 403(b) plan participants filed a lawsuit on behalf of themselves and other similarly situated 403(b) plan participants against Matrix Trust Company for making several transfers to an unauthorized account held by Vantage Benefits Administrators.

If convicted on all counts, they face up to 81 years in federal prison.

Why Do Advisers Sound So Similar in Sales Pitches?

Pershing researchers warn that it is far harder for advisers to convey the uniqueness of their value propositions than is commonly assumed.

Pershing published a new white paper focused on adviser business models and the challenges of differentiation, titled “Advisor Value Propositions: How Advisors Showcase Their Value to Investors—and What Investors Secretly Think.”

According to Pershing, many advisers assume that defining a unique value proposition is important to growing a business sustainably over time. And they are correct in this assumption, given that clients say they are attracted to advisers that can stand out from the crowd and deliver services tailored specifically to their needs.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

However, Pershing researchers warn that it is far harder for advisers to convey the uniqueness of their value propositions than is commonly assumed. In fact, over 60% of investors think that all advisers make more or less the same promises, in turn making it hard for them to tell the difference between even between firms that run very different operations.

The paper steps through an independent review of Barron’s 2017 publication, “Top 100 Independent Financial Advisors’ Websites,” noting that more than a quarter of the websites claim the respective firm is unique for its offering of “comprehensive portfolio management.”

According to Pershing, a quality value proposition combines four elements. It spells out the character attributes of the firm, the benefits clients receive from working with the firm, a rational argument for the firm’s strengths, and also an emotional component.

“Advisers need to speak more loudly about trust, accountability and transparency,” the paper says. “Trust is a critical issue to clients. However, they are almost evenly split on whether they believe advisers truly look out for their best interest.”

According to Pershing researchers, one “remarkable” trend in this survey data is the “growing importance of happiness, enjoying life and feeling good about their wealth.” Fully seven in 10 advisory firm clients say it is very or extremely important to have a financial plan that addresses their life goals, not just their finances. They want advisers to make them feel confident, self-assured and empowered.”

Pershing finds advisers are broadly underutilizing social media as a tool for promoting their value propositions. According to the survey data, over 40% of investors (and 73% of younger investors) turn to Google as a first step to research advisers. But most advisers are doing very little to optimize their Internet and social media presence.

Many different approaches can work here, Pershing says, but an adviser’s online presence should make certain things clear to potential clients. These include but are by no means limited to what the adviser’s ideal client profile might be; what specific problems the firm can solve for clients; what motivates the adviser to solve these specific challenges; why prospects should choose this firm rather than others; and evidentiary reasons why the adviser’s claims are believable.

“One in three investors has looked at an adviser’s personal Facebook page, and more than half of them decided not to work with an adviser as a result,” the paper says.

Pershing reminds advisers how the only way to know what investors really want is to ask them—and repeatedly.  

In terms of taking action, the Pershing white paper urges advisers to create a “phrase cloud” or “word cloud” that breaks down the language usage in client-facing materials in an easy-to-digest way. Importantly, the Pershing report includes a composite word cloud for the Barron’s Top 100 firms, against which individual firms can compare their own results. There are many free word cloud or phrase cloud generators online, researchers note.

According to Pershing, advisers may be surprised to learn just how close their phrase cloud resembles the composite. Many firms will find they are overusing certain words and phrases that do not resonate with potential clients, while they are under-emphasizing others that are more important.

The full paper can be downloaded here.

«