According to ICI, 401(k) Investors Get a Good Deal

At a time when the level of plan fees and the extent of their disclosure are a key issue in the retirement services space, a mutual fund trade group says 401(k) participants are actually getting a good deal on their investment expenses.

In a new report entitled “Economics of Providing 401(k) Plans: Services, Fees, and Expenses, 2006,” the Investment Company Institute (ICI) offers an argument that, because employers often pick up some plan expenses and other factors, participants get the benefits of saving for retirement at what ICI contends is a comparatively low cost.

The ICI report lays out the history and basic structure of the workplace savings programs and details the array of services the group says workers get in exchange for paying at least a portion of the plan’s operating expenses. “401(k) plans provide many American workers with the opportunity to invest cost effectively in mutual funds,” ICI declares in the report.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

Factors listed by the report as affecting “the relatively low expense ratios incurred by 401(k) plan participants” include:

  • competition among mutual funds and other investment products to offer shareholders service and performance;
  • plan sponsors’ decisions to cover a portion of the 401(k) plan costs, which allow them to select funds or share classes with less built-in servicing economies of scale that a large investor such as a 401(k)plan can achieve;
  • performance and cost-conscious decision-making by plan sponsors; and
  • unlike shareholders outside of 401(k) plans who typically pay for the assistance of a financial adviser when investing in mutual funds, there is a more limited role for such financial adviser services inside these plans.

Generally, because many plan sponsors pay a larger share of plan fees than legally required, participants reap the benefits, ICI argues.

“Many employers voluntarily cover some or all of plan-related costs that legally could be shouldered by the plan participants,’ the group asserts in the paper. “Any costs not paid by the employer, which may include administrative, investment, legal, and compliance costs, are, effectively, paid by plan participants. As a result, the employer’s decision to pay a portion of plan costs can have a significant impact on the 401(k) plan fees charged to plan participants. Generally, when more of the plan costs are subsidized by the employer, the costs paid by plan participants are lower.’

The ICI report is here. http://www.ici.org/stats/res/fm-v16n4.pdf

401k Toolbox Announces Adviser Planning Product

401k Toolbox, a Watkinsville, Georgia-based advice provider, has unveiled its On Track retirement planner and prospecting tool for plan advisers.

401k Toolbox’s advice program for participants is delivered by financial representatives in one-on-one, brief meetings using proprietary Web-based “On Track” retirement planner software, the company said in a news announcement.

A short analysis is done during the meeting that shows employees what their retirement income will look like based on their current savings, their current deferral, and time left until retirement.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

When the employee is not on track, the adviser can offer suggestions to improve the retirement outcome, to include, according to the announcement:

  • changing the asset allocation of the portfolios;
  • increasing the amount deferred;
  • postponing the age of retirement in order to save more, increase the social security benefit, and maintain health benefits with the current employer;
  • looking at what it is likely to cost to live in retirement; and
  • integrating additional assets into retirement calculations, along with the 401(k) assets to provide a true picture of their financial security.

More information is at https://www.401ktoolbox.com/toolbox/home.jsp

«