UMA Success Relies on Advisers

Fee-based advisers play a crucial role in determining the success of next-generation managed account solutions, such as unified managed account (UMA) programs, according to Cerulli Associates.

Despite the effect of market turbulence, growth in UMA programs has outpaced growth in other managed account segments year-to-date, according to the latest The Cerulli Edge—Asset Management Edition. By year-end 2012, Cerulli predicts that UMA programs could garner as much as $324 billion in assets (up from $45 billion of assets as of the third quarter of this year). While UMAs were expected to push separately managed accounts more “downstream,’ or to accounts with less balances, so far they are mostly prevalent in fee-based, high-balance accounts.

Fee-based advisers are more likely than commissioned-based advisers to believe that the UMA will enable them to streamline their interactions with, and improve delivery of, investment management to clients, according to Cerulli. While fee-based advisers in the wirehouse channel are more familiar with UMAs, the firm found they are no more likely to utilize UMAs than fee-based advisers in independent or bank channels. Overall UMAs still are not used by many advisers: More than 30% of all advisers remain unfamiliar with the platform.

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

A reason why UMAs might not be gaining more traction could be because of portability concerns. Investment management expertise of an asset manager is accessed through a model portfolio—meaning, should the adviser choose to change firms, the client relationship might be less portable. Cerulli says advisers “may feel as though the sponsor, through the UMA, is furthering their ownership of the client relationship by taking control of the investment management.’

UMAs are hailed by some in the industry for their ability to solve the adviser’s need for flexibility and control, which are two important desires of fee-based advisers. Meanwhile, Cerulli research shows that fee-based advisers also want some degree of research assistance while having the freedom to build their own asset allocations. Cerulli contends that as more independent advisers become better educated about the UMA, and as UMA programs become more diversified in terms of vehicle type, advisers will increasingly look to them to simplify their investment management process, according to the report.

Target-Date Funds Poised for Growth

Cerulli Associates says asset managers will look toward more progressive approaches with target-date funds in the next year.

Market volatility has affected target-date funds this fall, but nonetheless, Cerulli says the products are well-positioned for future innovation. Established and new players in the target-date fund are “embroiled in a debate over the topic of the most suitable glidepath,’ according to the latest The Cerulli Edge—U.S. Asset Management Edition.

Within the ever-growing market for embedded advice products (balanced funds, asset allocation funds, lifestyle or risk-based funds, and lifecycle or target-date funds), target-date products continue to be on the rise. Almost $36 billion captured by embedded-advice products went to target-date programs through September, according to Cerulli.

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

Cerulli estimates that by the end of this year, assets in target-date funds will reach $185 billion and will grow to more than $1 million by 2013. The firm expects for the percentage of where those assets are to remain the same, with 67% of target-date assets in defined contribution plans and another 20% in individual retirement accounts (IRAs).

Portfolio Construction

Cerulli notes a trend the firm anticipates going forward: exchange-traded funds (ETFs) within target-date products. ETFs have already begun to creep up into target-date funds, with products such as the Fiserv Target-Date Blueprint Funds, which invest in Claymore ETFs, and a series of target-date funds that exclusively use ETFs. Cerulli data show that 65% of asset managers plan to use alternatives in target-date portfolio construction (and 12% already do).

The current generation of target-date funds is rooted in traditional asset allocation strategies. However, Cerulli expects many asset managers to take a more progressive approach in the next six to 12 months, but the firm also cautions asset managers about buying into trendy asset allocation strategies. Cerulli also mentions the rise of more customization in target-date funds, and says most surveyed asset managers anticipate a shift in the next two years to a more open model where investors will be able to access additional managers.

Meanwhile, the industry continues to debate the correct glidepath. As Cerulli puts it: “Where does the asset manager’s role begin and end to ensure that investors in their products end up with sufficient retirement savings?’


«