In August, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued
guidance stating it will recognize same-gender couples married in states for
which it is legal for them to do so as married for federal income tax purposes
regardless of the state they currently reside (see “IRS
Provides Procedures for Same-Sex Marriage Tax Credits”). It is still up to
the individual states whether they will regard these individuals as married or
single.
According to the ADP Research Institute, states that do not
sanction same-gender marriages, but have decided to recognize them for state
income tax purposes, include Missouri and Oregon. States that do not sanction
same-gender marriages and will not recognize them for state income tax purposes
include Arizona, Georgia, Idaho, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi,
Nebraska, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Utah, Virginia and
Wisconsin.
The following states do not sanction same-gender marriages
and have not announced whether they will recognize them for state income tax
purposes: Alabama, Arkansas, Colorado, Indiana, Kentucky, Montana,
Pennsylvania, Puerto Rico, South Carolina and West Virginia.
The New Mexico Supreme Court issued a ruling today
legalizing same-gender marriages in that state.
The ADP Research Institute notes that California,
Connecticut, Delaware, Washington, D.C., Hawaii, Iowa, Illinois (effective June
1, 2014), Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey,
New York, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington sanction same-gender marriages.
Arkansas, Florida, Nevada, New Hampshire, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas,
Washington and Wyoming have no state income tax withholding.
The
Institutes Legislative Updates can be accessed here.
Sponsors’ focus on plan costs can create a roadblock to delivering
the best overall plan results unless they can be shown how improvements can be
made in concert with cost management. Cost concerns coupled with the amount of time sponsors
dedicate to health care programs— especially now with the Affordable Care Act—make
it easy to see why many advisers feel frustrated when trying to address the
pressing need to improve retirement plan outcomes for both the company and its
employees.
To tackle these challenges, leading retirement advisers
provide information that creates both a sense ofurgency and a sense of comfort that meaningful change can be
pursued. These leading advisers demonstrate
a passion for improving retirement plan effectiveness, often acting as the
single most important influence with plan sponsors and the decisions they make. Leading advisers are making impactful changes
and cementing their client relationships along the way.
Working in close partnership with advisers and sponsors
around the country, Prudential Retirement identified impactful ways advisers
and providers are motivating plan sponsors to ensure their plans are optimally
structured to create results they and their participants want and need.
#1: Be Strategic in Your Discovery
Traditionally, many advisers and providers have engaged
sponsors in annual planning by setting goals for incremental improvement around
key participant metrics. For example, they
set goals focused on participation rate or the average savings rate to rise
above current levels. From the
participant’s perspective, every little bit helps. But, these types of incremental steps are not
improving the majority of participants’ retirement readiness.
Leading advisers approach the planning process as an
opportunity to pursue a more strategic conversation with sponsors. They're asking different questions that help take
the annual planning process to a new level and a more strategic purpose. For example:
·
What are the overall benefit objectives of the
sponsor?
·
Are the current retirement programs fully meeting
these objectives?
·
Is the DC/401(k) plan considered a primary or
supplemental program for achieving participants' retirement income needs?
·
Are the retirement programs primarily intended
to benefit longer tenured employees? All
employees? Older employees?
·
If there is a defined benefit (DB) plan, how is
it projected to change over the next few years?
Is it currently frozen? Will it
be frozen? What are the implications?
·
What's the purpose of any non-qualified plan
that may exist? Is it designed to give
executives or other key categories of employees a way to save beyond the other
retirement programs?
·
How does participant-level retirement readiness
impact the sponsor’s workplace and working community?
·
How should participant retirement readiness be
measured? How do those measures compare
to the actual participant level readiness in the plan?
Asking these strategic questions provides opportunities to make
more impactful changes to the plan's overall structure as well as how employees
are utilizing it.
#2: Use Information to Influence Action
Armed with a clear understanding of the sponsor's strategic
objectives, today’s leading advisers bring powerful information to the table to
create a sense of urgency that changes should be made now.
Analysis can go straight to the heart of the issue most
near-and-dear to the sponsor. Namely,
where is the money going? Are we
spending benefit dollars wisely? Who is
benefiting from our contributions to the retirement programs?
Information can also be presented which help sponsors
clearly define options to achieve their strategic goals while avoiding their
pain points. For example, leading advisers
demonstrate that changes to a plan's matching formula may simultaneously improve
participant savings while lowering the sponsor's overall financial exposure. That type of analysis can overcome the
objections of even the most cost-conscious plan sponsor.
#3: Make Recommendations to Enhance Outcomes
Advisers can also help sponsors evaluate options for the
plan's design, investment lineup, and participant engagement. Advisers are able
to define these options by working with providers who offer access to the right
information and
experts to help design, manage and evolve the plan to achieve their strategic
objectives.
When it comes to plan investments, advisers are helping
sponsors ensure their fiduciary duties are met by presenting a broad range of
choices not only focused on individual asset classes, styles, and managers but
also on flexible asset allocation tools and investment product structures.
In the area of participant engagement, advisers and
providers are embracing new ways to inspire participants to take action based on
emotional and rational techniques – by humanizing the approach. Customizing messages based on the
participant's personal situation, focusing on their household’s specific retirement
income needs and finding ways to celebrate positive actions taken and
milestones achieved along the way.
Change the
Conversation
Breaking through sponsor inertia requires leadership. By focusing on strategic objectives,
presenting compelling information, and identifying clear options to minimize pain
points and allow the sponsor to spend their contribution dollars more wisely,
advisers can stimulate a fresh dialogue to enhance retirement plan
effectiveness.
Harry Dalessio is
senior vice president, Sales and Strategic Relationships at Prudential
Retirement. Dalessio leads national sales, including full service corporate,
tax exempt, stable value, pension risk transfer and institutional income, plus
the channel management team responsible for developing and implementing
Prudential’s Retirement’s channel strategy.
Channel management focuses on strengthening relationships with key
intermediaries (consultants, advisors and third-party platforms).
0255262-00001-00
Retirement products
and services are provided by Prudential Retirement Insurance and Annuity
Company, Hartford, CT or its affiliates.
NOTE: This feature is to provide general
information only, does not constitute legal advice, and cannot be used or
substituted for legal or tax advice.